Comments on: Anti-P2P bill gets warm welcome from Ruckus.com
Should federal financial aid be jeopardized if a university doesn't sign up for an RIAA-blessed music site? One such site thinks so.
Should federal financial aid be jeopardized if a university doesn't sign up for an RIAA-blessed music site? One such site thinks so.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.
Add this feed to your online news reader
an unbiased one.
o?pin?ion - noun - a view or judgment formed about
something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge
Additionally, this is a blog post, not a news story, so it will
probably be expressing an opinion. There is no journalistic
requirement for lack of bias.
It's amazing how blatantly the RIAA and MPAA have been publicly buying out government officials whose jobs... at least according to the constitution, is to protect the interests of the American people. Everyone know's that lobbying is nothing more than buying you're way into favor but the RIAA and MPAA have been more public about it then anyone else I can remember recently. Is this what our elected officials are elected to do?
For those that are downloading it, they're not all doing it illegally.
This is group punishment and it's wrong. It's also sending a boatload of business to a company that didn't even earn it.
It's not the job of higher education to send business to these guys. Let them go out and work for it like other companies do.
Charles R. Whealton
Charles Whealton @ pleasedontspam.com
Look how easily Disney gets the copyright laws rewritten in their
favor each time that frigging Mouse gets ready to go into the public
domain.
As long as the entertainment industry can write checks they'll get
pretty much whatever they want.
And if the U.S. government does take away Stafford loan, they will once again be called Indian givers, because for the past 40 years college students have almost always been guarenteed some federal aid under the Higher Education Act of 1965. Especially for something that won't add any academic value to your already outrageously high college tuition.
http://www.mindfully.org...fe-OR-SB742-27feb03.htm
http://www.infowars.com/..._tyranny_in_america.htm
Also, check out this film on Google video to learn about GOVERNMENT SPONSORED TERROR
http://video.google.com/...ocid=786048453686176230
1. Advertise supported music at no cost.
a. but yet the music is technically paid for by the student glancing at advertisements
b. music is not available to the students after they leave school, even though they
technically paid for it by perusing advertisements.
2. Ruckus, wants funding stopped, the term used by on respondent, "MAFIA" is most
fiting, although racketeering would probably be more socially acceptible. Ruckus
thinks that all students should pay the price becaus some miscreants break the
law. By that logic, If a Ruckus Officer is indicted for imbezzelment then all
board members of that company should face the same fate (makes sense to
me).
3. Schools are not arms of the Dept of Justice, or of State, county or city entities.
If a law is broken, the RIAA brings suit, and the investigation should be handled
in the legal system (as broken and corrupt as it is). Lawyers are making a mint
by threatening people.
As for me, just an old retiree, who still has vinyl, 8 tracs, reels, cassettes, and a ton of cd's
but my buying days are over. I used to move my tracks to cd's to create personal cds
to use in the car when traveling, but I will be damned if I want lawyers for the RIAA
screeming. So no, for at least the last few years, I have saved my upwards of a $1000
by not purchasing albums anymore.....Besides, a entire album, may only have 1 or 2
decent cuts on it, so you are paying $14 - $20 plus for two cuts...does that make sense.
But then, who really cares lawyers and big business run the government anyway.
- Ruckus
- by jgarne86 December 4, 2007 12:41 PM PST
- Well it's a start in the right direction but I don't agree that schools should be forced to sign up for this or students lose their grants. Why not just pass a bill to stop these P2P sites from hosting copyrighted music and movies. This will curb the problem. Most downloading comes from the fact that most songs that these people want are just one song off the CD and no one wants to buy a CD for one song, though it's still wrong thats the fact. Most artist today only have one or two songs worth listen to, things are not like it was when we had real music and artist that could really sing.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(11 Comments)