Version: 2008

Comments on: U.K. court clears Google search in defamation case

Google merely facilitates access to content but isn't actually a publisher liable for it, a High Court judge rules.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Pete Bardo July 20, 2009 3:13 PM PDT
This is good for Google. I wonder if the suit itself was a scam?
Reply to this comment
by gerrrg July 20, 2009 3:40 PM PDT
OMG, a judge that actually understood technology and the internet. Let's hope more judges out there are techno-savvy.
Reply to this comment
by magicmaster July 20, 2009 7:24 PM PDT
The judge demostrated that one shall not shoot the messenger.
Reply to this comment
by gajibrin July 25, 2009 12:13 PM PDT
I agree with your view, Thanks
by rmullen0 July 20, 2009 8:23 PM PDT
So how is this any different than a peer to peer network hosting MP3s? That is a double standard. The justice system needs to get it straight, it can't have it both ways.
Reply to this comment
by Nataku4ca July 21, 2009 12:59 PM PDT
wth are u talking about? p2p != search engine cropping up results =.=

shoot the messenger? u gotta use ur brains before the gun rmullen0
by rmullen0 September 8, 2009 11:36 PM PDT
I'm talking about how services like the original Napster and numerous other services were forced out of the market by the RIAA even though they didn't host copyrighted material, only indexed it. Why doesn't the RIAA just sue Google when someone posts an MP3 on the web then?
by audioman7 July 21, 2009 1:09 AM PDT
so, pirate bay also does exactly the same thing they help people find content but dont host the content so how come they get burnt and google doesnt?
Reply to this comment
by magicmaster July 21, 2009 5:05 AM PDT
@audioman7

Because they did not donate to political parties. In this world, if one expects lawmakers to offer protection, one would need to pay for it. Sad but the truth.
by Nataku4ca July 21, 2009 1:02 PM PDT
im gonna put it this way, the way pirate bay search is literally "looking" for downloads, google does general searches for everything related thus create possibility of copy right infringement material but it doesn't try to look for material that will cause copy right issues.

at least thats the way i see it
by maxorally July 21, 2009 5:04 PM PDT
Come on its like holding a search light towards where the consumer can find the information they need, the user then can decide what to do next. Its like having a 200mph car and driving at 30mph!

<a href="http://www.travel-barbados.co.uk">Matt From Barbados</a>
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Politics and Law

News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Politics and Law topics

advertisement
advertisement