Comments on: Bill proposes ISPs, Wi-Fi keep logs for police
The Internet Safety Act would require all providers of an "electronic communication service" to log user accounts for two years for later police convenience.
The Internet Safety Act would require all providers of an "electronic communication service" to log user accounts for two years for later police convenience.
Raw photos are a hassle compared to JPEG. But if you like photography, the list of their image quality advantages is long and getting longer.
Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.
News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Mix that with the wonderful Patriot act and you now give the government total control of all peoples PC and internet usage.
This is too powerful to be enacted. Public terminal WiFi hotspots should be sufficient and can be kept for investigative purposes. The public WiFi spots that businesses provide should be compensated for saving those files as well. This is yet another mess where the government is trying to curb the flow of information therefore keeping the public in check. This should never be passed in its current form unless you would like to live in a dystopian universe of George Orwell's design. This is just an opinion but to me it leads to many problems with privacy and rights in the future.
BTW: How is it that everything is now considered terrorism, even child pornography? I think the NSA (and others) think that gives them a blank check, to do whatever they want to invade our privacy, all under the guise of "protecting us from terrorists" or "protecting our children".
That's where your energy should be directed: standing up for your rights. Whether it is technically possible should be the LAST thing we should be discussing; or, whether it was a democrat or republican who thought of this crap.
if you let your children use the internet and you dont show them the what to do and what not to do then its your own stupid fault
thank the lord this is America being dumb and here we where hoping for change
the chance that this will ever get to south africa is very, very slim due to the fact that less then 10% of the people here have internet access
There are a few wifi home routers that when logging is turned fully on and everything is checked and you have the wifi firewall turned on then weeks down the road when that log file becomes full then all data in and out bypasses the firewall. Sure it is a bug but I forgot which brand wifi router this affects.
There is no home hardware version that has a large enough storage that would be able to comply with this new law. this would mean every WIFI router would need a hard drive or a solid state hard drive to keep the hardware small.
Many will keep logging turned off also to keep lag to a minimum when playing multiplayer games.
The technology is almost there for home users but the state it is in for retail sales for home users logging of WIFI routers / access points for home use is currently WORTHLESS!
Seriously, remember all those US congressmen and senetors with "little boy problems"? OR all the senators who claim to take the "moral high ground" when it comes to stuff like this? i think if they want to erase our liberty, why should they have any? Plus itll basically make sure that this never goes down.
Frankly, it seems that "Big Brother" wants to push a "1984" agenda harder than ever under a guise of protecting children. If the Feds are so hot on protecting kids, why haven't they gone and closed all of our borders to stop the trafficking of drugs into the U.S.? Why haven't they gone and pulled down all the possible porn sites that kids can get to everyday from the local library? This has nothing to do with protecting children, it has to do with being able to fully monitor what each of us is saying, thinking, reading, and doing. Its a mechanism for the politicians to use to ensure that we are not going to do something, say something, read something, or think something that could possibly put them in the "wrong light".
i also agree with the other person that russia is here wake up people your rights and civil liberties are being taken away everyday and only the privacy foundation and someother watchdogs are fight for the undogs where is cry for justice for the masses one day we will open our eyes and we will no longer be america the great free liberty for all there will be 1984 and all the cameras and logs and NO FREEDOM
But for a current case-in-point to see how knee-jerk legislation can have enormous unintended consequences:
Look at the Consumer Protection Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA). This legislation has decimated the American-Made small businesses of childrens' products, which by unexpected consequence has put thousands of American small businesses out of business, while consolidating the marketplace for giant Asian companies who can afford the testing requirements, most of those being the companies whose practices prompted the legislation to begin with.
No legislation should be hastened through based on political desires to be seen as "child protectors" if that legislation hasn't been thoroughly reviewed to ascertain that unintended consequences to the US economy which do not conflict with the goals of the legislation, are avoided, and reality-based effective protection is achieved.
The CPSIA sought to protect American children from Asian mass produced goods containing lead, yet its poor fabrication put thousands of compliant American small businesses out of work, and consolidated the market to allow only those same Asian producers to operate within it.
Don't jump at this legislation until its potential repercussions are thoroughly evaluated. It's easy to leap when politicians shout "protect our children!" But short sighted legislation can decimate the markets that our children may rely upon long-term. Protect our children's health and safety, but do it with enough research and foresight to not destroy their rights to privacy or livelihood.
- by wfarr18124 February 24, 2009 9:28 PM PST
- This sucks
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 4 of 5 pages (119 Comments)