Comments on: Democrats' plan: Net neutrality, copyright rewrite
Congress this year is likely to take up performance rights legislation and Net neutrality, a congressional staffer said Wednesday.
Congress this year is likely to take up performance rights legislation and Net neutrality, a congressional staffer said Wednesday.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.
Add this feed to your online news reader
I think this could be the solution or balance to the issue of backing up movies for playback on personal computers.
Wouldn't that be the same thing as
"the music industry would support Net neutrality legislation 'only if it says piracy is equal to legal commerce.'"
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Why does anyone care what the music or movies industries wants, they've been nothing but laggards, obstructionists, and at times extortionists. It's time they sink or swim and stop trying to put the dampers on innovation that does not fall in to lock step with their out dated though processes. Too long they've tried to preserve a business model that is several years over due for the scrape heap.
Do we really want to listen to an industry that has at various times tried to legislate or litigate out of existence technology that they don't like. Piano rolls, DAT tapes, VCRs, DVRs, and MP3 players for example. These industries are acutely myopic.
It's just too bad congress is corrupt as hell, which isn't surprising considering they get to write their own ethics rules. It's like putting a kid in charge of a candy shop. How many laws regarding copyright have been passed because the entertainment industries grease the palms of sympathetic congress critters.
Where the DVR is splitting hairs. This is kind stuff that has turned copyright law into a bad joke.
It is just stupid.
[/rant]
Why does anyone care what the music or movies industries wants, they've been nothing but laggards, obstructionists, and at times extortionists. It's time they sink or swim and stop trying to put the dampers on innovation that does not fall in to lock step with their out dated though processes. Too long they've tried to preserve a business model that is several years over due for the scrape heap.
Do we really want to listen to an industry that has at various times tried to legislate or litigate out of existence technology that they don't like. Piano rolls, DAT tapes, VCRs, DVRs, and MP3 players for example. These industries are acutely myopic.
It's just too bad congress is corrupt as hell, which isn't surprising considering they get to write their own ethics rules. It's like putting a kid in charge of a candy shop. How many laws regarding copyright have been passed because the entertainment industries grease the palms of sympathetic congress critters.
Where the DVR is splitting hairs. This is kind stuff that has turned copyright law into a bad joke.
It is just stupid.
[/rant]
- by bvra January 21, 2009 10:12 AM PST
- Seems analogous to a copy machine. You don't ban the copy machine simply because people can use it to infringe material protected by a copyright. Copyright holders must find people that directly infringe and if the infringement is worth worrying about, a phone call and negotiations typically end the infringement and filing an expensive lawsuit is unnecessary. The "content/entertainment" should be prevented from blocking this technology.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(13 Comments)