The 23-year-old Facebook CEO is interviewed by BusinessWeek writer Sarah Lacy at SXSWi, but an impatient audience wouldn't put up with the lack of stuff they hadn't heard before, not to mention a lack of tough questions overall.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
CNET News' Caroline McCarthy is a downtown Manhattanite who believes that, despite popular opinion, the Web can actually help your social life. She's happily addicted to fun social-media tools from Twitter to Yelp to Facebook, sends an inordinate number of text messages, and has a tendency to waste time at the office reading restaurant blogs. Here, she explores all facets of the Web's gregarious side, as well as the unique tech culture in her home city of New York. (Don't call it Silicon Alley.)
Add this feed to your online news reader
And, BTW, why did people laugh about the FARC, IYHO?
What Went Wrong - SXSW Keynote Sarah Lacy and Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook
March 10, 2008 at 12:59 pm · Filed under Industry Info · Edit
In my estimation, here is what went wrong. And, because I?m not trying to be mean-spirited, but instead, helpful, I?ve posted both suggestions for remedy as well as my experienced advice about how to handle a stage interview.
.Sarah Lacy Slouching
The train wreck:
1) Sarah wasn?t focused on what the SXSW audience wanted to know about FB. She was asking questions that were general and business-oriented, rather than what the SXSW crowd wanted to hear about from Mark which I believe fell into three categories.
First, they should have discussed current issues with features about personal usage in FB and upcoming personal features for FB. It?s applicable to everyone. The second and most important to the SXSW audience is the subject of making money as a FB developer. And the most important and interesting discussion topic should hve been the future of the social graph and the social media platform
2) Her interview style was too chummy and delivered in a way that was supposed to position her as ?in the know? but instead felt self-aggrandizing.
3) Her posture radiated an affected casualness that belied how intimidated she was. Everyone could tell. Better to be honest that you?re nervous and get the crowd on your side.
4) She was needlessly confrontational and horribly condescending. Noting how Mark was nervous at a past meeting together, she described him soaking his tee shirt through with sweat. Good god, he?s an amazingly talented and visionary man and a hero to most of the audience. She should have cut him some slack here and overlooked his nervousness. To bring that past incident up at this keynote was belittling and highlighted again how her own insecurities required her to punch him down to puff herself up. Boy did it backfire. Mark was smooth and in control. Sarah was infuriating the crowd.
5) Threatening Mark with an action similar to when she poured water on Michael Arrington of TechCrunch?s head was yet another inappropriate power move. What a humiliating gesture. I was horrified to hear about it and sickened that she thought it was additive to the interview. Grand-standing behavior like that is nothing short of being a bully.
6) The ?hair twirling.? Some say Sarah was acting too ?sexy.? I didn?t think so, She was nervous and that was a ?tell.? I whole-heartedly encourage feminine behavior in business. We don?t need to act like men. Flirting can be fun for all when it?s positive energy and a pleasure to the audience and done lightly. In Sarah?s case, it struck me as a thinly veiled attempt at manipulation.
7) When the crowd bared their teeth, Sarah was a first incredulous. Again, the sign of rampant ego. Then she tried to fight back, when instead she should have apologized immediately and figured out how to right the situation. Why didn?t the programming Chair of SXSW run up and help her? More disaster. Then to add insult to injury she once again made it ?all about her? and attempted to make the audience feel sorry for her, another misstep. The crowd was pissed.
8) In all of this, Mark continued to be gentlemanly, gracious and provide value. His ratings soared, more than they would have if Sarah weren?t so self-serving.
So Sarah, I recommend you fix this blunder in the following way.
http://blogs.personallifemedia.com/dishymix/2008/03/10/sarah-lacy-heres-how-to-resuscitate-your-reputation/
- Thank You
- by Prokofy Neva March 10, 2008 3:35 PM PDT
- Glad CNET turned out a female to cover more even-handedly this story which is about another rare female reporter covering the raucous and rude Digg nation of Geekville. Thank you -- good editorial decision! Daniel Terdiman is a disgrace, as usual.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(5 Comments)