Version: 2008

Comments on: The future of Web apps will see the death of e-mail

At the conference in Miami, more than a few Web 2.0 power players have been talking quite a bit about how e-mail really sucks.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (25 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
.Mac + mail.app = no spam...
by amandachuck February 29, 2008 3:13 PM PST
well, not no spam, but very, very, very little. and very few non-
spams end up in the trash, and it's easy to find them!

it's not email's fault that there are bad ISPs and bad clients out
there.
Reply to this comment
Most email providers
by Maclover1 February 29, 2008 10:52 PM PST
have killed off SPAM. I get Zero Spam with G-mail....NONE at all.
Of course Google bought Postini which is a rock solid product.

I dont think I got much of any back when I used hotmail last year
either.
View reply
What?
by sevenalive February 29, 2008 3:52 PM PST
Facebook and myspace messages are freaking emails, or Personal Messages. Its the same damn thing, and ya u do get spam messages on myspace and facebook, from apps and spam accounts.

This article and whoever thinks that myspace and facebook messaging is going to replace email are all retarded.
Reply to this comment
Not the future, but a function of age
by AeroJonesy February 29, 2008 3:55 PM PST
Younger folk may be forgoing email for messaging through Internet applications, but I don't see them as a replacement for email. People migrate through social networking sites as they get older. They are going to want a central address where they can always be reached - similar to the reasoning behind mobile phone number portability.

Apps may be good for quick short messages to arrange meetings or phone calls, and for casual conversation, but they aren't going to be a replacement for true email accounts.
Reply to this comment
also
by sevenalive February 29, 2008 3:58 PM PST
Twitter? This is so stupid, just because 15 year old girls do it, doesn't mean the rest of society does. Myspace and Facebook are mostly for chicks, guys don't really do it. I have them both, i don't login often, i only have it so high school friends can find me (i am 20.5 now). The only guys on those sites are trying to add as many girls as their friends then try to get their number, lets be realistic here.

DO you see the logic here? Oh so i gotta create an account at (w/e) and message you. Sounds like email, but email is better. At least with email, i only need your email address, not your username + site your at, then gotta create an account, then add as friend, then after approval we can EMAIL each other using their own private system.
Reply to this comment
Email is dead
by rcrusoe February 29, 2008 4:16 PM PST
Right, just don't tell that to corporate America who consider it
second only to oxygen.

And what's this about spam being a problem? Spam was
eliminated in 2006.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/24/tech/main595595.
shtml
Reply to this comment
right
by 42istheanswer February 29, 2008 5:35 PM PST
about corporate. You wanna mess with someones karma turn off their email. Facebook, MySpace and the like are fads. Youngsters like it cuz it's cool and the fuddy duddy's are boring email users. They'll graduate to email eventually. Their paycheck will depend on it.
Web 2.0--let's see
by johnwbaxter--2008 February 29, 2008 6:25 PM PST
Let's see. ActiveX vulnerabilities (including social network site
image uploaders). JavaScript: designed to be insecure. Flash
vulnerabilities. Quicktime vulnerabilities (how many updates this
year?). RealPlayer vulnerabilities.

Sounds like a perfect recipe for replacing email.

(I didn't mention Silverlight: a great test of whether Microsoft is
serious about security: new product built in the new era of
security assurance process. Too soon to tell whether it moves
up the to the first paragraph, or not.)
Reply to this comment
Javascript
by EricHP2 March 2, 2008 8:55 AM PST
Javascript is only insecure if you code it wrong. Like using GET
instead of POST. Not implementing public and private keys, and
so on.

Most email clients only use a normal transfer protocol.(Except
when logging in.) Meaning their security is only as good as
public and private keys. Thus, Javascript isn't weaker than them.

Plugins weren't ever meant to be secure. As you said, their not.

ActiveX can be turned off, and only IE 6 and below uses it for
XMLHttpRequest. And is IE specific. So why would use it.
"That was before Twitter suffered a downage...
by Commander_Spock February 29, 2008 6:38 PM PST
... when the start-up's architect, Blaine Cook, was giving a talk later in the day at FOWA and his phone kept ringing with calls from the site's server administrators..." Have you ever tried "IBM's Lotus Sametime Instant Messaging and Conferencing"?

http://www-306.ibm.com/software/lotus/category/uc2/
Reply to this comment
yeah I have
by Maclover1 February 29, 2008 10:55 PM PST
its a SAD POS, and thank god we just ditched it for Office
Communicator and Live Communications server. We through Notes
6.0 mail as well....BUH BYE!!!! Notes 6.0 was/is the worst email
client ever created.

I dont know anyone at work that misses it.
I get Spam in my Myspace and Facbook inbox/comments too...
by microsoft slayer February 29, 2008 9:24 PM PST
Instead of making the wheel better, these idiots are trying to re-invent the wheel...lame!
Reply to this comment
"the younger generation doesn't use email"
by kgsbca March 1, 2008 12:40 AM PST
I don't think all of the "younger generation" doesn't use email, just the ones who don't have jobs. email is a pretty useful form of communication, and it will go away just after phones die out. it may not be the best way to tell of of your friends what you think at any given moment, but it works well for point-to-point communications.

These comments sound like the "younger generation" in the last decade that responded to challenges to their their dot-com excel business plans with "you just don't get it". Yeah, the web was new, but not every site was destined to be profitable. And the "web 2.0" isn't the answer to everything.

sorry for the extensive use of " ", it's just that way too many people talk in cliches.
Reply to this comment
How many letters have you mailed recently?
by Stufiano March 3, 2008 5:30 PM PST
The post office was an popular communication hub, bu not it's only for bills and very formal communications.

I love your scorn from those of us classified as the "younger generation". Yeah, I use email, for official things but how many things are OFFICIAL? How profitable will a site be if people only use it for official communication? Not very.

Personally, I find email, well, lonely. It's not quick or convenient to utilize "outlook" or yahoo mail. No one checks their email on a regular basis [not even my professors]. Only way it can survive is through cellphones and data plans are outrageous. Adding $20-40 extra dollars to my monthly bill is not likely for me. I pay for college, gas, housing, etc -- leaving no room for extras like that.

Im/texting is more viable since its cheaper [http://around 10-15 extra per month for unlimited msgs.|http://around 10-15 extra per month for unlimited msgs.] and fills email's niche quite nicely.

And for online communication, social networks and im work better than email for convenient comm. with quicker, more engaged feedback. And, yes, you CAN type as much in im as an email.

Times change, so does communication.
Good luck with your job using facebook.
by hunter_jc March 1, 2008 5:51 AM PST
Yeah i would love to see how the "younger" generation will tell their boss, Can everyone just have a facebook account so we don't have to use email?
Reply to this comment
Really?
by Stufiano March 3, 2008 5:34 PM PST
Seeing as major employers are ALREADY ON facebook and using for communication, I fail to see you point.

Could you clarify it for me?
How will you sign up for facebook without email?
by vaporland March 1, 2008 6:36 AM PST
Last time I checked, all of those nifty Web 2.0 message delivery mechanisms required email addresses in order to register.

Call me old fashioned, but I think the ubiquitousness of email will endure at least a little longer.

Chatting, et. al., has its place; so does email.

And as others have noted, with a little effort and forethought, you can virtually eliminate spam.
Reply to this comment
Agreed
by photolarry March 1, 2008 9:37 AM PST
Email will not die. Its the main way businesses still communicate. And for that matter friends and family are going to be using it a long time too. Some of us do not use more tech savy ways of messages like twitter that are more reserved for geeky nerdy types (like myself).
Indeed
by fejack March 1, 2008 2:22 PM PST
Email has been around intranets since 1961. It is an old, yet proven technology. The only thing it might need is an upgrade, which should definitely include encryption and identification keys to protect users from eyesdropping and plagues such as spam.
These guys are living in a dream world.
by WJeansonne March 1, 2008 8:07 AM PST
I'm starting to get errant text messages on my phone now including to sex related offerings via text spam and two miskeyed telephone numbers. I can see full-blown spawn just around the corner.
Reply to this comment
E-mail's dying?!
by JohnBarbagallo March 2, 2008 12:06 AM PST
Umm, not at all in my opinion. E-mail is still being used for the most part and we will not see it die anytime soon, I assure you.
Reply to this comment
I'm trying to ditch email
by thattalldude March 2, 2008 6:53 PM PST
I've been trying to get rid of email for several months. While I cannot yet completely get rid of it, mostly because of my blogs, I am slowly getting rid of everything in email that I don't "NEED" email for. While Facebook and MySpace may not have the world's most perfect messaging system, they are a start. I truly believe that Facebook's messages will evolve into an email-like system, and sooner than we think. If Facebook and MySpace make a compatible API for their message setups, email could quickly decline.
Reply to this comment
the more things change...
by ARod53 March 3, 2008 7:24 AM PST
ok, let's assume I can get everyone to sign up for the same social platform (Twitter, Facebook, etc.) or can get all of the disparate systems to develop a means for their systems to inter-communicate (don't we have something like that today?) and now I can communicate w/ everyone I know or new folks I meet via my social platform ... didn't I just replace email with "new" email? Doesn't this sound as revolutionary and well-thought out as New Coke?

The more things change, the more they stay the same. Great article -- 100% hype, 0% vision.
Reply to this comment
really?
by Stufiano March 3, 2008 5:33 PM PST
Seeing as major employers are ALREADY ON facebook and using for communication, I fail to see you point.

Could you clarify it for me?
Reply to this comment
(25 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About The Social

CNET News' Caroline McCarthy is a downtown Manhattanite who believes that, despite popular opinion, the Web can actually help your social life. She's happily addicted to fun social-media tools from Twitter to Yelp to Facebook, sends an inordinate number of text messages, and has a tendency to waste time at the office reading restaurant blogs. Here, she explores all facets of the Web's gregarious side, as well as the unique tech culture in her home city of New York. (Don't call it Silicon Alley.)

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Social topics

advertisement
advertisement