Version: 2008

Comments on: Microsoft acquires equity stake in Facebook, expands ad partnership

A $240 million ante means a bigger piece of the action at the hot social networking site. It's all about the ads, Redmond says.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
F*** THAT! I just deleted my FaceBook profile
by MyRightEye October 24, 2007 1:47 PM PDT
No way my MS is having anything to do with me and my friends nor
my personal data.
Reply to this comment
LOL
by TaintDeli October 24, 2007 3:09 PM PDT
How old are you? 14?
View all 2 replies
Haha
by amarkj October 24, 2007 7:35 PM PDT
You should be worried about Google getting a hold of your data!
View reply
Equity Stake.... Why?!?!?
by ev61 October 24, 2007 1:48 PM PDT
If I was on the "Facebook Team" I wouldn't have sold the advertising to Microsoft, I would have sold facebook.com in its entirety. How many people have a part in this multi-billion dollar company? They all could have left, never having to work again, leaving the rest of their lives to pursue their own dreams. Facebook has peaked, get out now and give your family financial freedom for generations!
Reply to this comment
Pointless!
by winstein October 24, 2007 2:29 PM PDT
Good for Facebook for getting $240M for only selling 1.5% of the company. But it doesn't mean anything if Facebook could not get enough Ad revenue from Microsoft's Ad network!

Remember Microsoft also paid SCO 60M to go after Novell, IBM, and RedHat for Linux copyrights? SCO is now out of business.
Reply to this comment
15 Billion?
by NWLB October 24, 2007 2:48 PM PDT
Uh, no. I'd sell Microsoft shares, if I had any, if they keep this up. Its not that trying to compete with Google is bad, its that Microsoft can't seem to do anything with most of these things, and can't even do well with what it has. Trumping up Facebook to be worth that much? Just doesn't make sense.
Reply to this comment
yeah...
by dondarko October 24, 2007 7:53 PM PDT
it's way overbloated.
View reply
The Hotmail Story...All Over Again
by bhushan bhaagii October 28, 2007 8:10 AM PDT
Remember Hotmail? At the time Sabeer Bhatia cashed out it was thought to be a coup.And within six months Hotmail was estimated to be worth $10 billion. Microsoft was not able to exploit or leverage this priceless acquisition. Content development was never their forte, they did come up with Slate.com, and MSNBC, but one has not heard about these ever being hot advertising/revenue generating properties.

Microsoft is good at duplicating innovative software that others create and which has an application on the desktop: from windows, IE to NT, winamp, frontpage, et al. But it has shown a singular lack of ability in innovating new products and properties on its own.
Steve Ballmer...
by whizkid454 October 24, 2007 4:30 PM PDT
This guy really seems like he's out of everything that is going on at Microsoft. First he tells everyone that there is no plan for a "Zune Phone", then others at MS say that there will be one "soon". Just as he said Facebook/Myspace were "fads", now he believes "he" made a right decision in taking part of them. I can think of many other examples but there would be too many to list.

Way to go Gates. Let the clueless run the company and it is doomed as it lately seems to be.
Reply to this comment
Ballmer's secrets
by maverick_nick October 25, 2007 12:55 AM PDT
I don't agree with you on this. Ballmer know's everything that's going on at Microsoft, but he seems to be trying to keep everyone guessing. Well he's no Steve Jobs and the secrets always get out.

For some reason this sounds like Sony?
Haha
by ca5ter October 24, 2007 5:02 PM PDT
Hey Microsoft, I have some swamp land for sale. Interested?
Reply to this comment
Microsoft's trophy date to the prom.
by ServedUp October 24, 2007 7:42 PM PDT
All those millions of dollars wasted.

Couldn't Microsoft do anything more original with the money?

Like maybe donate it to the Gate's Foundation, or dare I say put
all of it into research & development? Their making ridiculous
foolhardy decisions based on popularity and passing fads which
could soon turn sour, especially in their hands.

It's as if, their in highschool trying to look for a date for the
prom. But instead of doing the hardwork themselves, they
chicken out at the last minute and opt. at buying themselves a
trophy date. Sure the girl is hot, but at the end of the day
Microsoft still looks like a geek.

But the minute they tie-in WMV, WMA or any other BS MS
proprietary format not to mention the ZUNE Marketplace or
exhibit any monopolistic behavior will be the day I say good-bye
to Facebook.
Reply to this comment
some numbers
by rdgadz October 25, 2007 9:52 AM PDT
you might be forgetting that microsoft's annual income is around 15billion.... making this 240m an investment of less than 2% of what they made last year.

for years, yes before there was myspace and facebook, they had been working on networking sites. they did the work they just missed the boat.

now they are buying it.. i dont see what is wrong with this other than good business sense.
Wrong.
by doublethought84 October 24, 2007 8:27 PM PDT
I think the reason Facebook is doing so well, and the reason that virtually every single college student in the country has a facebook profile, is because the facebook team's dream is to do this work. It began with a purpose in mind, not a paycheck.

It's such a great resource beyond what most people on here laugh at about social networks. I spent half of my college career without facebook and half with it, and I cannot tell you how much more efficient life in general became once the site went mainstream. Communication and collaboration on a platform that everyone can easily access from anywhere without clutter or fear of any kind of spam is what makes this unique and appealing. It's not at its peak, believe me. I do think they went the wrong direction when they opened it up to "regions," but there are limitless possibilities for facebook in the education realm.

As for Microsoft... eh... who cares? They're going to try to advertise. Big deal. We'll see if it works for 'em. I doubt they have the creativity and innovation it takes to impact the educated, 20something market that facebook has wrapped around its finger.
Reply to this comment
Why not Google?
by Edifier_ComputerFan October 24, 2007 10:02 PM PDT
This is good to the business-to all of them. However, I do not want Microsoft to take Facebook. Personally, I would liketo hear that Google takes Facebook on a certain day. Well, I am a Google fan.
Reply to this comment
Facebook = another useless Junk out of Silicon Valley
by free_people October 25, 2007 8:36 AM PDT
Amazing:
Japanese give us Prius that gets 60 Miles per Gallon and looks & feels great and for which we gladly pay $20000+
French give us Luxury Airliner and TGV that travels center city to center city carrying people in comfort & speed.

What do we get from USA (Silicon Valley), another Useless Junky Big Media Hyped free Web service.
I mean for goodness sake, WHAT IS new & innovative about this Junk Facebook?
What does it offer to the users that has not been available through 100s of different sources/services?
NOTHING.
What does it offer to Advertisers that makes Advertising on it a good/better deal?
NOTHING.

Now if you want a Web service that is actually innovative & useful for end users and Advertisers
try this search engine called Anoox, which by definition means it does not come out of Silicon Valley and is not Hyped by Big US Media. It is innovative & useful because its search results are generated democratically by us "The People", and it is operated on a "not-profit-motivated" basis so cost of Advertising on it is much lower.
Reply to this comment
No
by buttskunk October 25, 2007 10:29 AM PDT
The site is not worth 15 billion.
Reply to this comment
I'm 22 and still don't want M$ in my Info
by aaronlancet October 25, 2007 5:13 PM PDT
Honestly, I'm not quite happy about this acquisition either. I only
can hope that Microsoft has no stake in any of the 'personal
data' that Facebook holds. We'll see if I delete my profile or not,
depending on how this deal affects the service Facebook
provides. My real problem is that the only viable alternative is
MySpace, owned by News Corp. It's like being stuck between a
rock and a hard place... I would leave the online social
networking game all together if it wasn't for keeping in contact
with all my old friends from College... sigh.
Reply to this comment
PERCEPTION: Only Diabolical Intent on MSFT's Part
by Sumatra-Bosch October 28, 2007 9:29 AM PDT
Everyone I talk to about it is abandoning FaceBook on the assumption that MSFT will turn it into a fish barrel, selling off every preference, data point or click to one marketer or another.

There's got to be a name for this effect: MSFT buys something and the company's reputation as a rapacious cult of back-stabbing liars and vile opportunists completely guts the value of the company as employees and customers rush for the door.
Reply to this comment
(23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About The Social

CNET News' Caroline McCarthy is a downtown Manhattanite who believes that, despite popular opinion, the Web can actually help your social life. She's happily addicted to fun social-media tools from Twitter to Yelp to Facebook, sends an inordinate number of text messages, and has a tendency to waste time at the office reading restaurant blogs. Here, she explores all facets of the Web's gregarious side, as well as the unique tech culture in her home city of New York. (Don't call it Silicon Alley.)

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Social topics

advertisement
advertisement