Version: 2008

Comments on: Imeem picks Android, not iPhone, for mobile app

Social-music site's first phone application, free of charge, is built for Google's mobile operating system rather than the trendy Apple App Store. Also: it has no layoff plans.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by David Dudley October 20, 2008 11:49 PM PDT
If you believe the numbers T-Mobile is touting, then in theory, iMeem would have decent market penetration possibilities. But, there are insides coming forth who've stated that 1.5 million was simply smoke and mirrors from T-Mobile which seems the likely scenario. Let's instead do the math that T-Mobile plans to order 1.5 million handsets from HTC over a year long period which seems more likely, and let's venture a guess that approximately 10% of the total Android adopters decide to download the iMeem application, with another 50% deciding to actually use it more than once and out of those, maybe 10% actually purchase songs from Amazon, generating money for iMeem - approximately 7,500 users generating potential revenue. Of course, we have no idea how many times these users will purchase songs and generate revenue for iMeem and since I lack access to their data warehouse (assuming they have one), I won't even bother to guess user behavior. Why did iMeem not develop an app for the iPhone? Simple! They have no way to monetize it as they are doing a simple Amazon affiliate play and they have no deal signed with Apple.
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 October 21, 2008 8:02 AM PDT
I think you are missing the point. By developing for Android they're gaining access to an entire range of phones - not a single T-mobile phone. There is every chance they'll have access to a much larger market than they would have had on iPhone - not at the moment of course, but only an idiot has a strategy based on where things are at the moment. Could this be monetized? Sure, but my guess is that they're using this more as a draw to get more people onto imeem.com and to stake out a position.
by sting7k October 21, 2008 6:15 AM PDT
Yaaaawn, I will never understand why anyone wants/needs to stream radio stations when you have a device filled with thousands of songs. Radio is dying, no one cares about it anymore, let it go.
Reply to this comment
by jazzmandan October 21, 2008 7:06 AM PDT
I do - because I listen to all sorts of music and artists I don't own, can't afford and don't have the time to discover, buy and rip.

But then I have a 3g network pretty much everywhere I go in a given 4 month period.
by forensicmeteoboy October 21, 2008 7:58 AM PDT
Radio isn't dead for me. I listen to a member-support alternative radio station that streams on the web and over the air. I have a tiny collection of music- but it's not because I don't like a number of artists, it's simply because I don't have the time or money to buy music. I have no use for an iPod- I have no time for it. I'm a busy college student. I'll let the DJs who love music and know it well to make a better mix than any machine could. I hate commercial radio, by the way. And I can see why it's easy for most people to just get an iPod or whatever- because they only listen to the same 500 songs or so. Trust me- I see it everywhere on my campus.
by jazzmandan October 21, 2008 7:07 AM PDT
Can't see much point in this if it doesn't stream? I suspect not putting it on the iPhone is smart because it would be compared unfavorably to Pandora and Last.fm applications.
Reply to this comment
by iConquered October 21, 2008 7:59 AM PDT
I would not be so swift in any declaration about the sepulchral state of the radio. I do agree to an extent. I found the inclusion of an FM tuner on the Zune, to be rather unimportant. After all, you are carrying a device designed to play the music you want, so you can avoid commercials and scouring stations for enjoyable songs. However, in general, the radio still provides mass exposure for quite a few bands.

It is true that the radio has adhered to standards with greater frequency, as of late (especially with the popularity of Rock Band and Guitar Hero). Despite this however, there are occasional new bands that appear on the radio. I do believe that the way users experience radio, will change very soon, but it will not entirely die off. I see radio being replaced by things like Pandora, LastFM and iMeem.

Not everyone is brave enough to buy an album without hearing it first. In fact, I am the only person I have known, to do such a thing. I purchased an album from The Fall of Troy (their first album) based entirely on their track list names and the band name. I lucked out, but serendipity of that sort is a rarity. People need exposure to new music some how. And I doubt that most of the public enjoys reading Skyscraper, like I do. Radio is changing, not dying.
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About The Social

CNET News' Caroline McCarthy is a downtown Manhattanite who believes that, despite popular opinion, the Web can actually help your social life. She's happily addicted to fun social-media tools from Twitter to Yelp to Facebook, sends an inordinate number of text messages, and has a tendency to waste time at the office reading restaurant blogs. Here, she explores all facets of the Web's gregarious side, as well as the unique tech culture in her home city of New York. (Don't call it Silicon Alley.)

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Social topics

advertisement
advertisement