Comments on: Clearly, there's nothing like Grand Canyon Skywalk

A visit to Grand Canyon West and its glass bridge over and into the canyon is an experience for a lifetime.
Photos: Floating over Grand Canyon

[allstar919]

That's interesting

Wow...quite a different perspective than that of the NY Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/19/arts/design/19sky.html?ex=1185422400&en=0f963ad663c06f7c&ei=5070

or search "Grand Canyon Skywalk" from their homepage.

[Jeff Putz]

Who can blame them? Are you kidding?

Who can blame them for not allowing you to take pictures? Are you kidding? For what it costs, they damn well better give you a camera! Lame.

[xcopy]

Agreed...

No pictures. No ticket. I don't think I'll ever pay to go out on that thing.

The author has "left the building"....

[tfsilvia]

Restrictions

I was at the Canyon last week and skipped the Skywalk because I was told that you could not bring cameras or any electronic items out on the walk. Did they change the policy?

[freewheel]

First positive review I've heard

I've not been there myself, but I have read about five negative reviews of the skywalk experience. It's too remote, overpriced, and the wait is too long are some criticisms I recall. I'm glad you enjoyed it, though.

[SGCustom]

Photos

You can't take photos on it?????

[Ada5750]

No Pictures

That's what we do! Take a trip and keep the memories of it on film. I'll ever go there.

[ferdilverdil]

Bumpy Ride Getting There

I was so anxious to go after reading about the Grand Opening of the Skywalk back in March, I booked a quick trip and was there 2 weeks later. I had read everything I could find online before going, which wasn't too much at the time, but I didn't find any suprises: I was even prepared for the the long bumpy rocky winding roads. Actually, there was one suprise after getting there, like many I was very suprised and disappointed to find that cameras were not allowed out on the glass walkway. Being a photographer, I was probably more disappointed then most. So I checked my camera bag with security, donned my special booties and out I went. I too have a fear of heights, well it's more a fear of unstable things like ladders. I had no uneasy feeling as I walked around the Skywalk and got a chuckle out of those holding onto the railing and taking baby steps as they walked. I did manage to shoot several photos with my smuggled digital point and shoot camera, pity I couldn't have used my "real" camera to take better shots, but these will do.

I know the Hualapai are doing alot of construction in the area, expanding the airport to accomodate commercail traffic and paving the road in for a smoother ride in. The paving, I believe was expected to be completed by the end of the year, I wonder if any has been started yet.

[Michael00360]

no picutes

I think they should allow all photography on the bridge. Maybe they can even have some professionals get under the bridge or on parts not accessible to tourist and take the really good shots. While I'm not a pro (and very scared of heights), I think that if I were to go to something like the skywalk I would want to take pictures. Hopefully they will see the error of their ways and change the policy.

[waywest]

memories

let me get this straight- 24 miles of washboard road- $81.00- no
cameras-this is NOT my idea of a dream trip it's a friggin
nightmare

[ferdilverdil]

Some memories have a price

Admittedly I could have done without the bone-jarring 21 mile ride, but it wasn't all that bad and promises to be a paved road soon. I had no problem paying the $50 park entrance fee (which by the way includes alight lunch) and another $25 to walk the Skywalk. I knew how much it was before going and understood that the whole point of the Skywalk is to raise revenue for the tribe. You can take all the pictures you want of the Skywalk itself and of the canyon views from any area except the actual Skywalk.

The purpose of no cameras and other hand held items is to prevent items from being dropped onto the glass surface which is easily scratched. While they do offer a souvenier photo of you while on the Skywalk, which they do of course charge extra for, the shot they take is not the typical shot people would be taking with their own cameras looking straight down thru the glass. So I feel they are genuine in their reasoning for no cameras.

[bob1960]

It's a shame...

That we live in such a techno world that even when going out into nature we scream and cry because we must only use our eyes to view something beautiful.

Shame on all of you that hate because you can't sit in your lounge chair and wag a photo at your buds and make them feel envious that you were there and they weren't!

Get real, people.... Some things are better left natural. Probably why they built a "glass" bridge there, so that you could "see" the beauty of nature. Plenty of other things to take photos of in this world...

Now anybody want to see the pics I took of the UFO with aliens holding up signs... "No Photos allowed?"

[mikeburek]

Their only income

These Indians feel they are so hopeless in this world and can only support themselves by prostituting out the land - work and education must be a white man thing. They don't have to have actual money to start buying Hummers or to even pay taxes on the land. Why can't they learn to survive and stop blaming white man society for killing them off? Yes it was bad, but sulking yourself into an uneducated stupor will not help.

[mikeburek]

Why not share

So not only are the cable companies, phone companies, cell phone companies, music companies, movie companies all on this "People were only born to give us all their money and be our slaves" view of the world, but now this Indian tribe has decided to do the same.

This is upsetting me enough that my new goal in life is to create a company that will actually try to please a customer, not squeeze money.

Is there no other transparent substance available so people don't have to walk around in booties and worry about "dropping a camara and scrating the glass floor?" Because, I know I'm always throwing my $200 camara on the ground. You know, I can always just go grab another one without flinching if the lens gets scratched or out of alignment or the lcd cracks. When I can't find a hammer, I just grab my trusty camara and pound away. Those things are so indestructable.

Has anyone here ever driven through the desert? What happens to your windshield? What, a scratch? Why did you walk on your windshield? Oh, you say the sand in the wind. I see. Good thing they don't have sand or wind at the Grand Canyon. Oh, wait, let me check an encylopedia on that one...

When I first heard about it, I thought it would be mostly transparent. But the pictures of it show humongous steel beam supports and lots of smaller crossing supports. Because of their attitude toward visitors, I will never visit it myself, but it seems that the floor is far from fully transparent. For that price I can get a hotel room at a fancy Las Vegas hotel on the strip. And 2 nights off the strip. And you can bring a camara. And is there still a short time limit? Even Disney World is cheaper for an all day all access pass!

Remember "Field of Dreams"? If you build it they will come. Yes they will, but when you first charge to drive on horrible roads, then charge again to get on the thing, then take away camaras, then prod people along quickly to fit more "cattle" onto you money squeezer, you will turn many many people away.

What if visitors were respected? What if you told a visitor "Look at this beautiful landscape. Please, just a small charge to help us keep it up." Think of how many people would say "Wow! I have respect for this. Please, here's more a big donation to preserve this. I want to be a better person."

Instead, at least for me, I would say "Dang, $80, a poke in the ribs, not even a picture, and a order for new car shocks. Yeah, that's nice, lets go home and drive the Hummer in city traffic and sit inside and watch tv."

P.S. Did you know that ancient civilizations like the Romans and Greeks and even up to somewhere around the 18th century, they were all time travelers. Yeah, see, they had some rugged land and wanted it smoothed out. So they just flipped their communicator open and called for a paving crew. When you go visit Rome, all those streets were really built by people who still have not been born. Really. What, you think people who own the land would get a shovel do-hickey and work to smooth out the land themselves? Ha, you probably are one of those people with pride and ethics. The Indians have been though enough. Everyone mail them money so they can smooth out the road to their only source of income.

[ferdilverdil]

You mean it's made of steel too?? WTF?!!

You said...
"When I first heard about it, I thought it would be mostly transparent. But the pictures of it show humongous steel beam supports and lots of smaller crossing supports. I will never visit it myself, but it seems that the floor is far from fully transparent."...

Since you haven't seen pictures of the actual floor I'm not suprised you assume it's not fully transparent. The entire center of the walkway, aprox. 6 feet wide is indeed completely transparent, free of any obstructions. There is about a 2-3' section on each side of it that has frosted glass to cover any support beams (which is also good for those who are afraid to walk over the clear glass)

But golly, they said it was made of glass...
Why yes, Opie, it is, but you need to have a support system strong enough to hold the loads put on it. Sarcasm is a sign of a simple mind, but I use it to humor you... I'm sure the thinking is that people are clumsy and will accidentally drop things onto the glass, not hammer in imaginary nails with their cameras.

And as to your argument about sand in the wind scratching it, yes the sand in the wind may have some effect on it over time, but I have driven off road in the desert and scratches I've gotten come from rocks hitting the windshield, not sand. The workers there take pretty good care to quickly and carefully clean any dust that settles on the skywalk and its glass walls.

I don't know what makes you think you are rushed off either- I spent over an hour on it and was not once asked to move on nevermind getting poked in the ribs.

[euspos]

Why even go...?

While I do support and honor the Hualapai Indians rights to their land - land that we (white Europeans) stole from them - it'll be a cold day in hell before I pay (that much) money to walk out on the skybridge.

Grand Canyon is a marvelous place, but one can experience a lot of it for "free" (park admission granted). I've ran solo from the rim down to the river and back up again - likely one of my best night time runs ever - as well as hiked the Canyon rim inside and outside the park. Free, part from some water and wear and tear on shoes.

For the less able, just "hanging" in GC village provides a lot of the majestic feelings being close to GC trigger.

But building a modern looking "skywalk" in the middle of nowhere, charging huge money for admission to it, linking it up with helicopter tours, and other (motorized) tourist trappings - for people who drive up from Vegas for a "see Grand Canyon in 4-hours" - thank you, I think we'd be better w/o that stuff.

Instead work on preserving and displaying the wonderful culture, artifacts, and craftmanship of the Hualapai. Don't try to create a modern "trap" in the middle of nowhere - totally out of style/shape with anything within 200 miles or more. That "beast" is better reserved for the Vegas strip. The Hualapai lands would be better if left for hiking and horsebackriding. The canyon is just not itself encrusted with modern buildings and activities.