Comments on: Ten irrelevant technology companies
These 10 public technology companies were once important, even exciting. Now they're well on their way to obscurity.
These 10 public technology companies were once important, even exciting. Now they're well on their way to obscurity.
The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
Photos: Unboxing Nexus One
faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.
Steve Tobak is a marketing consultant and former chip industry executive. Train Wreck provides insight into dysfunctional corporate behavior, among other things. When he's not airing the industry's dirty laundry, Steve likes to hang around the house, make believe he's working, and drive his wife crazy. Find out more at www.invisor.net or email Steve at trainwreck@invisor.net. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
That said, I still think the post Gerstner IBM is not as strong.
My pick for dying on the vine would be Novell. They have regained some relevance by shifting to Open Source, but the revenue just isn't the same.
IBM is doing just fine as a company. They are not a dinosaur, but more like an crocodile - still alive after millions of years and not going anywhere.
If only american car companies could have been as dynamic, Detroit wouldn't be growing corn right now.
A few other noteables are:
Tundra Semi - steadily declining revenues since 2004 despite some aquisitions.
Zarlink Semi - oh boy, talk about losing money.
Mosaid - A nice stream of licensing fees from sueing folks over a few memory patents completely wasted on a bunch of ill conceived semi plays. They should fire everyone except the lawyers and accountants.
I go back and forth on Novell, but definitely not what it used to be.
Schwartz has definitely improved Sun's bottom line, but The Street's still not buying it and neither am I. I just don't see a clear strategy for driving top-line growth like in the old days.
Steve Tobak
- by Alpachino321 February 18, 2008 10:34 PM PST
- Good wiki
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(15 Comments)http://capify.stikipad.com/wiki/show/HomePage
http://capify.stikipad.com/wiki/recent_activity/128
http://www.globalize-rails.org/globalize/recent_activity
http://ajaxscaffold.stikipad.com/doc/recent_activity/
http://ajaxscaffold.stikipad.com/doc/show/HomePage