Version: 2008

Comments on: Yet another Intel antitrust probe

Oh no, not another antitrust probe of the chip giant. Doesn't this stuff ever get old?

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by gsmiller88 January 15, 2008 8:43 AM PST
Yawn...

I remember when everyone was for the underdog (AMD) in this battle, but after the endless amount of whining and bickering on their behalf that seems to no longer be the case.

How can AMD complain about Intel stifling competition and innovation, it isn't Intel's fault AMD has had to delay 90% of their new products over the past year!
Reply to this comment
by tbsteph January 15, 2008 8:48 AM PST
AG Cuomo, Senator Schumer, the EU, amongst others, are constantly assaulting high profile US tech companies (INTC, MSFT, AAPL etc.) for either money (EU), perceived political advantage (Schumer) or perceived future political gain (Cuomo). No good deed goes unpunished.
Reply to this comment
by brchoate January 15, 2008 10:39 AM PST
I think you have a legitimate point about US entities pursuing high tech companies like Intel and Microsoft, because US antitrust laws are far more forgiving than the laws of the EU or even some Asian nations. Furthermore, there is no real precedent in the US for going after companies for the practices and actions of Intel. However, the EU antitrust laws are far less forgiving and usually revolve around abuse of dominant position principles, which makes sense in many ways if you seek to foster a competitive environment. I think Cuomo and others are beginning to attach themselves to the EU's view of dominant abuse in order to try and foster more competition. I guess the most important question is whether or not the EU's take on things and any remedies/penalties it imposes actually do anything to foster a competitive environment--the track record appears to be that they do not. And, of course, the other issue is whether or not competitive losers are using these rules/law as a crutch as opposed to reflecting inward and trying to become more competitive through organizational change.

Bryan Choate
http://sultanofsemiconductors.blogspot.com/
by ykhan67 January 15, 2008 1:46 PM PST
"The competitors in question are AMD, AMD, and of course, AMD."

Of course it's only AMD. Intel has already killed off or driven away all of its other competitors over the years, including Cyrix, IDTI, NEC, IBM, etc. If not for AMD, we'd be stuck with a full monopoly. Stop whining about AMD whining, there's a good reason for AMD to do so. You can't say the same about you.
Reply to this comment
by jlm429 January 16, 2008 7:31 AM PST
I think AMD just agreed to build a plant in the Albany area of NY. Sounds like quid pro quo.
Reply to this comment
by frasercrane January 22, 2008 1:33 AM PST
And where are the Intel factories ...
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Train Wreck

Steve Tobak is a marketing consultant and former chip industry executive. Train Wreck provides insight into dysfunctional corporate behavior, among other things. When he's not airing the industry's dirty laundry, Steve likes to hang around the house, make believe he's working, and drive his wife crazy. Find out more at www.invisor.net or email Steve at trainwreck@invisor.net. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Train Wreck topics

advertisement
advertisement