Comments on: Still more reasons to avoid Internet Explorer
Highlighting the obvious: Firefox good, IE bad.
Highlighting the obvious: Firefox good, IE bad.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Michael Horowitz is an independent computer consultant and the author of several classes on Defensive Computing. He views Defensive Computing as taking steps, when things are running well, to avoid or minimize the inevitable problems down the road. It's about educating yourself to the level where you can make your own intelligent decisions about keeping your computers and data happy and healthy. If you depend on computers, yet are on your own, without an IT department or nearby nerd, this blog's for you. His personal web site is michaelhorowitz.com.
He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Disclosure.Add this feed to your online news reader
Internet Explorer works fine. It has more attacks of malware and stuff because it's the dominant browser, the one most people use. So it's the one that's targeted the most. Same with Windows in general.
The Mozilla Corporation makes a lot of money because it has a deal with Google and its search bar that comes with it. Does the Mozilla company pay its employees? Does it still ask for donations?
I've had Firefox 3 and previous versions freeze on me many times. IE freezes sometimes too. Opera has bene more stable and I'm not sure about Maxthon. Maxthon seemed really impressive. And Safari is good. Basically all five of the top browsers are good. Even Konquerer is good.
But I think money-making corporations should pay its "volunteers" money for their work (in making the Mozilla programs). This free software stuff that Richard Stallman peddles is Communism and it's wrong.
Matthew Dickinson
I do not think firefox 3 can be any better than ie with its premature release. Unless some annoying bugs is fixed i will stay with firefox 2.
I do not think that the "premature" firefox 3 is anyway better than ie. Unless the bugs are fixed firefox 2 user (including myself) is not going to be very happy when they upgrade to firefox 3.
Just to name a few: downloads - download manager in FireFox is gives full control of your donwloaded or saved files. Popup messages - every time I need to use IE7 I am just amazed by the sheer number of popup messages like "do you want to proceed", "blabla" - somehow FireFox avoids them all together or knows how to present warning in non-intrusive way.
Pretty much every other function of FireFox somehow works as you expect it to work: with no annoying messages and with access to the comprehensive data about everything you need to know. When using IE7 I go *** every 5 minutes because of all the little annoyances.
Trust me, if things today were reverse and Apple had a larger market share, along with Firefox, we would all be complaining about them and how they are unsafe compared to Microsoft, the little start-up that could (ha!). If Apple and Firefox both continue to gain ground in the consumer market, and they also continue to do these studies, I think one would find in time that the number of problems increase proportionately to the overall market share.
Let's use an analogy:
Smaller towns have less crime, on average, than large cities. Whereas crime is often more prevalent in areas of greater population. More people to prey on, the more incidents.
Let's assume that your asinine comments are true. So explain why Windows Server and IIS has a minority share and the vast majority of the exploits?
Also please explain how Mac OS9 had lots of flaws exploited and had a much smaller market share than OSX which after 7 years or so has exactly 0 in the wild exploits.
There go your ignorant opinions.
Windows and IE gets attacked because it is the low hanging fruit. AKA the easiest.
Secondly, Windows Server and IIS is based on a lot of consumer level products, with sometimes the code being DIRECTLY ported. So since Windows Vista is very similar to Windows Server.... you get a vulnerability on one, it is usually going to affect the other.
As to OSX not having any 'in the wild' exploits.... wrong. They have had at least two that I know of, that I read about on PC World. I don't remember what those two referenced, but it had something to do with Safari.
As to Windows and IE being attacked because it is the 'easiest'... no. More and more, it is becoming apparent that it is NOT the easiest to attack, just the one that is out there on most consumer systems.
Heck, even the computer criminals and crackers have admitted that in court when asked why they target IE and Windows.
IE 7 has improved, Firefox is faster, blah, blah, blah....Instead of breaking down each Microsoft product, try taking a class in unbiased journalism...That will be time better spend....Until that time, no more CNET and second-hand journalism for me!
Just before I bought an iMac in Dec 2006, I used IE7. Without a doubt, that is the most horrendous iteration of that Browser; constant crashes, slow page loading, and hanging at the slightest little thing were just some of its hallmarks.
I then used Safari for a time, and I found it to be a much more stable and reliable browser. Then along came Safari 3, and it was a shadow of its former self. Pages did indeed load faster, but crashes and hangs were common. It also no longer "played nice" in a chat room (no live refresh; you had to manually reload the page to see conversation) and the message boards (no quote function support) on a website I belong to.
I then downloaded Firefox 2 and was blow away at its stability and ease of use. I've been using FF 3 since the first beta, and it's even better now than it ever was. It even works great in that aforementioned chat room and message board. Browsing the web has never been easier, more reliable, and more fun. I love the fact that I can customize the way it looks, and with Ad Block Plus, I never have to look at a piece of advertising anymore.
If you haven't downloaded FF 3 yet, you really need to. Highly recommended for not only faster and more secure browsing, but your sanity as well!
PS>Firefox is indeed the Phoenix from the ashes of the late, lamented Netscape as the Mozilla project was spun off from Netscape just before the AOL purchase. Talk about coming full circle!
- by mcjazzer November 10, 2008 9:09 PM PST
- I'm unfortunately working for a school district that has been taken over by the "all Microsoft all the time" crowd - they started by redoing the whole network, using Microsoft's "Active Directory" (we were using Novell for the network before). Then came the My Documents synchronization (a waste), etc. Now we're being told that they have to remove Mozilla from all the district computers because some enterprising high school students have used the fact that Mozilla is open source to write script that gets around the district's filters so they can access inappropriate sites....I'm not a fan of MS at all, but is that kind of thing a potential problem for businesses or other organizations - the fact that Mozilla is open source, so it can be programmed to cause mischief?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 2 pages (53 Comments)