Comments on: Hey Obama: Reboot the music industry!
If we can bail out the auto industry and spend at least a trillion dollars to save the financial system and reinvest in infrastructure, surely we could spare a dime for the music biz.
If we can bail out the auto industry and spend at least a trillion dollars to save the financial system and reinvest in infrastructure, surely we could spare a dime for the music biz.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Matt Rosoff is an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, where he covers Microsoft's consumer products and corporate news. He's written about the technology industry since 1995 and reviewed the first Rio MP3 player for CNET.com in 1998. He's also a bass guitarist and an avid collector (and digitizer) of LP records. DISCLAIMER: This blog contains the personal opinions of the author and does not necessarily represent the opinions of his employers or of CNET Networks. As an IT industry analyst, the author occasionally agrees to nondisclosure agreements from Microsoft or other companies, and he will not violate the terms of such agreements on this blog.
He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Disclosure.Add this feed to your online news reader
But where would you stop? If kids' school days had to make time for music appreciation, art appreciation, architecture appreciation, dance appreciation, poetry appreciation, sculpture appreciation and so on, there wouldn't be enough hours left for the now-mandatory coursework in multicultural free-range condom application and whatnot, let alone dumb, unglamorous stuff such as spelling and math.
And would you really want some Soviet-style cultural apparat doling out tax breaks and stipends to individual musicians and venues? Inevitably you'd wind up subsidizing musicians who were good at politicking, at the expense of musicians who were only good at music. Since those two kinds of talents are somewhat mutually exclusive, the end result would be that overall, music would get worse rather than better -- as the real Soviet Union, and most local and state arts council grant programs, demonstrate all too painfully.
Yeah, that was sarcasm.
Happy Holidays!
I think I will have a cookie, and pie. Have a Merry Christmas (That's right, I'm not afraid to say it, but don't fret too much with a reply, you might contribute to carbon emissions in some way.
If the government invested money through the RIAA it would only serve to stifle the independent artists who have figured out how to make money in the digital era and who are actually producing a product worth buying. The major labels deserve to die a not so painless death. Maybe then we can actually have music worth paying for. I buy exclusively from independent artists these days.
Like everything else, music is probably going to have to get a lot more local.
Bail outs should be left to only crisis aversion, or you're constantly rewarding failure.
But the essential issue is that these guys treated technology as the enemy for a long time and are justly being punished for that stupidity.
Music (along with other arts) will survive and quite honestly, the industry needs to rebuild itself based upon the digital era. Until they truly do that, I will have no sympathy for them.
BTW, the RIAAs campaign did not end, it just changed targets to one that is less of a PR disaster.
Also stop producing ****** music. I think we are sick to death of Britney Spears pop crap and we are sick to death of CDs containing only one or two great tracks with 10 mediocre filler songs. It's rare to stumble upon a disc where every song is quality! Stop focusing on that one big single and focus on just a solid great album.
But Obama only is really looking to invest money into sources where it will be repaid to the taxpayers. The auto makers will have to abide by this. So I doubt he'd give money to bands and such.
And for the record, if art/music training in this country wasn't such a joke, there wouldn't be posts like this in the first place. sheesh.
If your serious... You have issues about what runs the economy and the actually realities of the music industry in general. Take a few days to research the history of the entertainment industry from the great depression on, you might learn something.
- by lorcro2000 December 25, 2008 1:59 PM PST
- No, no. Step one will have to be to take out one of the underlying factors that cause poor music sales and kills musical diversity - re-regulate radio to the way it was before the Clear Channel days. The rule used to be that any one entity could only own a few radio stations and that was even regulated based on area covered and so forth. Payola still happened then, but not the institutionalized and ritualized version that goes on now where the studios pay the so-called independent promoters who in turn pay the radio behemoths for airplay.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (31 Comments)Since pay-to-play is not only alive and well but booming, the studios go for "sure things" that in reality are just warmed over old leftovers... re-regulate radio and take out the darn middlemen and maybe music as a whole could recover again, radio play of music is an important factor.