Version: 2008
  • On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10

Comments on: Was 1980s music that bad?

NPR asks listeners which year featured the best music, and the 1980s emerge as a bleak era. Personally, the '80s figure prominently in my collection, but well behind the 1970s.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by arcanium1 September 4, 2008 3:37 PM PDT
Bear in mind that NPR's listener base is very heavily in the Smug Boomers demographic; they resent the 80s and much of its youth/popular culture because it wasn't focused on them.
Reply to this comment
by techman21 September 4, 2008 4:07 PM PDT
80's was the best! You just have the wrong people taking the survey. 70's was the worst.
Reply to this comment
by gsmiller88 September 4, 2008 4:08 PM PDT
Who the #&*! are The Replacements, Talking Heads, Minor Threat, and Escape Club?! I like 90s music pretty well as it's rather nostalgic, but every age group's favorite decade of music will vary.
Reply to this comment
by MattRosoff September 4, 2008 4:34 PM PDT
I don't know what kind of music you like, but tons of today's pop-punk and emo music owes the Replacements. Go to http://www.songerize.com and search for any of these songs:
I Will Dare
Unsatisfied
Answering Machine
Hold My Life
Swinging Party
Bastards of Young
Here Comes A Regular

If you like, dig deeper.

Talking Heads--you know them, even if you think you don't.
by The_Decider September 5, 2008 8:28 PM PDT
If you have to ask that question, you don't know enough about music.
by thund3rbox September 4, 2008 4:49 PM PDT
Huh?!? Who are these losers they gave the survey to?

For starters, how about REM, Husker Du, Minutemen, Sonic Youth, Meat Puppets, Black Flag, Social Distortion, Bad Religion, Camper Van Beethoven, Replacements, X, Los Lobos.

Keep going? Ok, Dinosaur Jr., The Smiths, The Cure, The Pixies, Mudhoney, Metallica (when they were good), Voivod, Dead Kennedys, Fear, MDC, Melvins, Faith No More...

oh heck, just go here:
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/feature/36736-top-100-albums-of-the-1980s
Reply to this comment
by UITD September 4, 2008 5:24 PM PDT
From about 1989 forward - all music SUCKS. Period. Whatever the heck that crap is, including [c]RAP itself, sucks. 1980's music was absolutely the best. 70's wasnt so bad either.
Reply to this comment
by ozzymrjack September 4, 2008 6:45 PM PDT
hey you got it wrong! [c]RAP isnt real music at all!
by ozzymrjack September 4, 2008 6:44 PM PDT
they should have had diferent polls for diferent genres of music! but the best years where around the 60's [SABBATH!!]
Reply to this comment
by open-mind September 4, 2008 10:18 PM PDT
Yeah, the 80's were pretty bad. But not as bad as the 90's or 00's.
Reply to this comment
by MartinHennessy September 5, 2008 2:23 AM PDT
As a music journalist focused on the 1980s (and recordings by those artists since), I have to say that there is a bad stigma associated with 80s music. When mentioning the decade, people instantly associate Michael Jackson, Madonna, Prince, Duran Duran, Wham! and a host of other pop artists that dominated the charts. Sure, there are the overplayed classics ("Tainted Love," "I Melt With You" and "I Ran") that get beat into your skull at most 'retro' radio stations... but come on! Thousands of albums were released at this time. There is a penchant for forgetting U2, The Clash and yes... Nine Inch Nails (Pretty Hate Machine debuted in 1989.) The amount of airplay a song received seems to have a way of brainwashing the masses and sadly, some of the best songs of the 80s will remain hidden gems.
Reply to this comment
by The_Decider September 5, 2008 8:25 PM PDT
Don;t forget all that horrible hair spray pop. Bon Jovi, Def Leppard, Cinderella, Warrant, Motley Crue, etc, etc, etc. That stuff made Duran Duran and Flock of Seagulls seem like instant classics.

I always wondered why Soft Cell didn't get more airplay. They had many great songs.
by daveturnley September 5, 2008 8:05 AM PDT
the '40s (1--can you guess which album it was?): I was going to guess Robert Johnson, but he died in 1938.

The 60s had some incomprehensible breakthroughs (Beatles, Hendrix), but it's also overrated. The 70s are underrated (you always have to ignore the album charts, which almost always highlight the worst.) I understand why people hate the bombosity, but it's hard to deny Pink Floyd and Led Zep. And is there anything better than really good funk? Punk was nearly as revolutionary as the Beatles (yes, I'm comparing a movement to a band). It's hard to decide whether the 80s or 90s were worse. They had their moments, for sure, as Thund3erbox notes.

But I have to say that the aughts have been pretty damn good. It's just more fractured, which is fine with me. Radiohead, Sigur Ros, Tom Waits, Gorillaz, M. Ward, Wilco, Godspeed, TV on the Radio, Niko Case. There's a strong vein of sincerity in music today, which is a great counter to the disaffection that runs throughout popular culture. And the psych movement is as strong now as it's ever been.
Reply to this comment
by plasticities September 5, 2008 9:17 AM PDT
Yes, it might take some searching, but there's plenty of good music in each decade. Saying things like "no good music has been made since 1989" is just ridiculous. Also, dismissing expansive genres of music (rap/hip-hop) is pretty close-minded.

As for the 80's, I think they do go under appreciated. Daydream Nation, Rain Dogs, Doolittle, Remain In Light, Psychocandy, Murmur, and Closer, just to name a few, all measure up to some of the top albums in any other decade.
Reply to this comment
by The_Decider September 5, 2008 8:23 PM PDT
The crap that was on the charts was crap. There have been many great bands already named from the 80's, most of the didn't chart all that often, but it is all fantastic.

Add: Circle Jerks, Bad Religion, Big Country, Slayer, Midnight Oil, Black Flag, Anthrax, Butthole Surfers, The Cure, The Damned, Iron Maiden, Megadeth, Sepultura, Oingo Boingo, Suicidal Tendencies, I could go on all night. At best these bands had one or two minor 'hits' but were putting out first rate, compelling music.

From about 75-76 on, most of the music that was "popular" was appallingly bad, especially in the 80's. That doesn't mean that the 80's sucked for music. There was some fantastic music that charted between 92-96, but when the Spice Girls showed up not too long after that, things went downhill and haven't really recovered. Not coincidently, the dumbing down of America started around this time.
Reply to this comment
by sadchild September 9, 2008 6:50 AM PDT
you said...

'70s were tops with 216 albums, followed very closely by--gasp--the '80s with 195 albums. Next up were the '90s (156), the '00s (112 with only seven years and eight months gone), the '60s (94), the '50s (9), and the '40s (1--can you guess which album it was?).

so in other words, you weren't alive in the 50s (1 album), very young in the 60s (94 albums), a teen something in the 70s (216), in your 20s in the 80s (195), in your 30s in the 90s (156), now you are in your 40s (112).

let me make a wild prediction. your collection of 2010-2019 will be less than 2000-2009. and 2020-2029 will be less than 2010-2019.

boy i should play the stock market!

or maybe you're just a typical citizen who discovers music in his teens, listens to almost as much in his 20s, less in his 30s, etc etc. no revelation here, dude.
Reply to this comment
by MattRosoff September 9, 2008 8:17 PM PDT
Actually, I was born at the end of 1969, so you're a little off--I'm not even 40 yet! I was a little kid through the 1970s, and in high school in the 80s, so that should be my "top" level according to you. But it's not--I always liked music from a previous generation, don't ask me why. (No, I didn't have any older siblings who would have "gotten me into" 70s music...just discovered it through radio and friernds.) And based on current buying patterns and the artists I like, I might end up with more albums from this decade--my 30s--than I will for all of the 90s--my 20s.

So no, don't play the stock market.
(17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Google's mobile hopes go beyond Nexus One

The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
• Photos: Unboxing Nexus One

Using your smartphone safely

faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.

About Digital Noise: Music and Tech

Matt Rosoff is an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, where he covers Microsoft's consumer products and corporate news. He's written about the technology industry since 1995 and reviewed the first Rio MP3 player for CNET.com in 1998. He's also a bass guitarist and an avid collector (and digitizer) of LP records. DISCLAIMER: This blog contains the personal opinions of the author and does not necessarily represent the opinions of his employers or of CNET Networks. As an IT industry analyst, the author occasionally agrees to nondisclosure agreements from Microsoft or other companies, and he will not violate the terms of such agreements on this blog.

He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Noise: Music and Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement