Comments on: Was 1980s music that bad?
NPR asks listeners which year featured the best music, and the 1980s emerge as a bleak era. Personally, the '80s figure prominently in my collection, but well behind the 1970s.
NPR asks listeners which year featured the best music, and the 1980s emerge as a bleak era. Personally, the '80s figure prominently in my collection, but well behind the 1970s.
The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
Photos: Unboxing Nexus One
faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.
Matt Rosoff is an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, where he covers Microsoft's consumer products and corporate news. He's written about the technology industry since 1995 and reviewed the first Rio MP3 player for CNET.com in 1998. He's also a bass guitarist and an avid collector (and digitizer) of LP records. DISCLAIMER: This blog contains the personal opinions of the author and does not necessarily represent the opinions of his employers or of CNET Networks. As an IT industry analyst, the author occasionally agrees to nondisclosure agreements from Microsoft or other companies, and he will not violate the terms of such agreements on this blog.
He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Disclosure.Add this feed to your online news reader
I Will Dare
Unsatisfied
Answering Machine
Hold My Life
Swinging Party
Bastards of Young
Here Comes A Regular
If you like, dig deeper.
Talking Heads--you know them, even if you think you don't.
For starters, how about REM, Husker Du, Minutemen, Sonic Youth, Meat Puppets, Black Flag, Social Distortion, Bad Religion, Camper Van Beethoven, Replacements, X, Los Lobos.
Keep going? Ok, Dinosaur Jr., The Smiths, The Cure, The Pixies, Mudhoney, Metallica (when they were good), Voivod, Dead Kennedys, Fear, MDC, Melvins, Faith No More...
oh heck, just go here:
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/feature/36736-top-100-albums-of-the-1980s
I always wondered why Soft Cell didn't get more airplay. They had many great songs.
The 60s had some incomprehensible breakthroughs (Beatles, Hendrix), but it's also overrated. The 70s are underrated (you always have to ignore the album charts, which almost always highlight the worst.) I understand why people hate the bombosity, but it's hard to deny Pink Floyd and Led Zep. And is there anything better than really good funk? Punk was nearly as revolutionary as the Beatles (yes, I'm comparing a movement to a band). It's hard to decide whether the 80s or 90s were worse. They had their moments, for sure, as Thund3erbox notes.
But I have to say that the aughts have been pretty damn good. It's just more fractured, which is fine with me. Radiohead, Sigur Ros, Tom Waits, Gorillaz, M. Ward, Wilco, Godspeed, TV on the Radio, Niko Case. There's a strong vein of sincerity in music today, which is a great counter to the disaffection that runs throughout popular culture. And the psych movement is as strong now as it's ever been.
As for the 80's, I think they do go under appreciated. Daydream Nation, Rain Dogs, Doolittle, Remain In Light, Psychocandy, Murmur, and Closer, just to name a few, all measure up to some of the top albums in any other decade.
Add: Circle Jerks, Bad Religion, Big Country, Slayer, Midnight Oil, Black Flag, Anthrax, Butthole Surfers, The Cure, The Damned, Iron Maiden, Megadeth, Sepultura, Oingo Boingo, Suicidal Tendencies, I could go on all night. At best these bands had one or two minor 'hits' but were putting out first rate, compelling music.
From about 75-76 on, most of the music that was "popular" was appallingly bad, especially in the 80's. That doesn't mean that the 80's sucked for music. There was some fantastic music that charted between 92-96, but when the Spice Girls showed up not too long after that, things went downhill and haven't really recovered. Not coincidently, the dumbing down of America started around this time.
- by sadchild September 9, 2008 6:50 AM PDT
- you said...
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by MattRosoff September 9, 2008 8:17 PM PDT
- Actually, I was born at the end of 1969, so you're a little off--I'm not even 40 yet! I was a little kid through the 1970s, and in high school in the 80s, so that should be my "top" level according to you. But it's not--I always liked music from a previous generation, don't ask me why. (No, I didn't have any older siblings who would have "gotten me into" 70s music...just discovered it through radio and friernds.) And based on current buying patterns and the artists I like, I might end up with more albums from this decade--my 30s--than I will for all of the 90s--my 20s.
- Like this
-
(17 Comments)'70s were tops with 216 albums, followed very closely by--gasp--the '80s with 195 albums. Next up were the '90s (156), the '00s (112 with only seven years and eight months gone), the '60s (94), the '50s (9), and the '40s (1--can you guess which album it was?).
so in other words, you weren't alive in the 50s (1 album), very young in the 60s (94 albums), a teen something in the 70s (216), in your 20s in the 80s (195), in your 30s in the 90s (156), now you are in your 40s (112).
let me make a wild prediction. your collection of 2010-2019 will be less than 2000-2009. and 2020-2029 will be less than 2010-2019.
boy i should play the stock market!
or maybe you're just a typical citizen who discovers music in his teens, listens to almost as much in his 20s, less in his 30s, etc etc. no revelation here, dude.
So no, don't play the stock market.