Comments on: OLPC battery life--an update
Glaskowsky passes along some feedback from the OLPC organization.
Glaskowsky passes along some feedback from the OLPC organization.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Silicon Valley-based computer architect and chip analyst Peter N. Glaskowsky attends a variety of industry conferences throughout the year to meet with industry thought leaders and dig into the future of computing technology. In Speeds and Feeds, he analyzes trends in system architecture and interface design, as well as market and political pressures surrounding those trends. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
- Here's a question for Mr. Bill Gates!..
- by idsantos August 30, 2007 8:08 AM PDT
- When will it be posible to do that with Windows Vista installed?..
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Windows also has power-management features
- by Peter N. Glaskowsky August 30, 2007 12:25 PM PDT
- Windows already provides similar power-management features. Windows
- Like this
-
- Oh, one more thing
- by Peter N. Glaskowsky August 30, 2007 12:30 PM PDT
- When I was working at Microprocessor Report, Bill Gates once told me that he
- Like this
-
(3 Comments)laptops need much larger batteries to get similar battery-life figures because
they run faster, higher-power processors, more memory, rotating hard disks,
etc.
In short, they're more complex and more capable, and that requires them to
consume more power.
I will note that the power consumption of most laptops is less than
proportional to their relative performance vs. the XO. You can get a notebook
with a dual-core 1.6 GHz CPU and a 12" LCD that consumes only about 8W
under normal use-- about 2.5 times as much average power consumption as
the XO, but with over 10 times the CPU performance potential.
Of course, that system will consume much, much more power if you actually
try to use all that extra performance. The XO maxes out at about 6 watts for
433 MHz of CPU frequency (roughly the performance equivalent of a 300 MHz
Core 2 Duo processor), according to Mr. Gettys of OLPC.
A 1.6 GHz Core 2 Duo low-voltage notebook can consume 25 watts or more
(I'm just guessing here, I've never tried to measure it), but you're still getting
ten times the performance. So in fact a PC notebook is more energy efficient.
This should come as no surprise, because it uses more modern technology
than the XO.
The XO's advantage as an educational system is that it delivers enough
performance and a lower minimum-power figure at the lowest possible cost.
That's more important than energy efficiency for these emerging markets.
. png
read our newsletter, and I thought that was pretty cool. But if he's reading this
blog, I would be very much surprised. Flattered, of course, but surprised. :-)
. png