Comments on: Google taking security a little too seriously?
An apparent problem with Google's malware detector leads to mayhem on a Saturday morning.
An apparent problem with Google's malware detector leads to mayhem on a Saturday morning.
The Noisebridge hacker space offers sewing and Mandarin classes, soldering workshops, Internet-controlled front door access, and a server room with no door.
Photos: Circuits, code, community
roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.
Silicon Valley-based computer architect and chip analyst Peter N. Glaskowsky attends a variety of industry conferences throughout the year to meet with industry thought leaders and dig into the future of computing technology. In Speeds and Feeds, he analyzes trends in system architecture and interface design, as well as market and political pressures surrounding those trends. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Cheers
Mike in Buenos Aires
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1134775
. png
Awesome. Eh.
Do you mean that the responses to your queries are being manipulated?
I know that the ads you see on Google can vary according to such factors, but if Google is selectively altering search _results_ on that basis, I haven't heard about it. Can you provide a source for this information?
Eric Schmidt the CEO of Google is also on the board of directors at Apple, and a Free Mason.
I have also noticed that Google results can vary from one user to another, but I think this is just a consequence of Google's rather loosely coupled site architecture-- it isn't exactly deterministic by design, more like herding cats.
too funny
If you google 'google'
it suggests that their site may harm your computer
is the Firefox plugin that allows the user to choose which scripts (Java, JavaScript), Flash content, cross-scripts, and other hazardous web content to display when you visit a web site.
Since most malware comes from this type of content, it is important to be very selective about what is allowed to run on a website and install on your computer.
It takes a little more effort to surf the web with NoScript (but it takes a lot of effort to get malware off your system or re-install a system crippled with malware).
Even though the problem was caused by StopBadware.org, the responsibility is Google's since it affected their site. When building distributed systems, paranoia is a healthy attitude.
There was no need to toss your cookies.
(Sorry, I couldn't resist.)
- by Authortrek January 31, 2009 8:36 AM PST
- Great article, which I have referenced in my own account, which contains a poem that I have previously written about Google's monopolistic behavior: http://inprint.thesyp.org.uk/news.php?id=190
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by Grifter02 January 31, 2009 7:59 PM PST
- It's called monopolistic behavior when a company becomes popular now? I'm pretty sure they have lots of competition. And everything they offer is free, so who cares???
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (39 Comments)