Comments on: Google Android success: I'll believe it when I see it
Don Reisinger isn't sure Android will be a success. Will it?
Don Reisinger isn't sure Android will be a success. Will it?
Raw photos are a hassle compared to JPEG. But if you like photography, the list of their image quality advantages is long and getting longer.
Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.
Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.
Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.
Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes
Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes
Also, Android's targeting more demographics than the iPhone - one of Androids strengths will be bringing smart phone levels of features to lower end phones, which is not something Apple will be doing. Nor RIM - sorry, but the blackberry isn't "the solution for all phones on all carriers for all people". While I doubt there will ever be a single solution, I think Google Android will be a lot closer than what Apple, RIM or Microsoft currently offer.
"Just because Google creates it, we shouldn't expect it to succeed"
Change Apple for Google and you have what a lot of people wrote about the iPhone before it was released. You can't call a product a success or a failure until it's actually been released and failed/succeeded.
One last point "According to most developers, Android is a disgustingly horrible platform to create apps" - where did you get this from? "According to most developers" is a pretty strong statement and I'd love to know what backs this statement up. What I find funny is that you bemoan Android's SDK as part of the reason why Android will probably be DOA and compare it to the iPhone SDK- which came out how long after the iPhone was released? At least there will be third party Android apps from day one. And don't forget that Android development is multi-platform - that iPhone SDK still only runs on Mac.
"Apple understood that -- AT&T is the prime reason the iPhone is so popular "
is complete crap. One of the biggest complaints about the iPhone is that it is only officially available on AT&T.
My opinion - Of course Apple only leads in the U.S. market so google and android might wind up like Nokia , Sony , samsung, HTC and windows, making more money globally.
The U.S. Cell phone market is garbage, just like the airline industry, too much capitalism mixed with too much socialism. Two extremes never work well together; especialy when one is socialistic regulation and the other extreme capitalistic competition.
- by gerrrg July 6, 2008 8:36 PM PDT
- Here's the benefit of Android: it gives developers an alternative that may unify into the primary alternative to the iPhone platform. Verizon balked at Apple's terms to carry the iPhone, but Android presents an open environment for Verizon to work with. There is no incentive for AT&T to latch onto the alternative to the iPhone, so you wouldn't expect them to express interest. So be it. Let Apple be closed, let Android be open, and we'll find out whether a closed or open system works best.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(6 Comments)