Comments on: Is motion-sensitive gaming a gimmick?
Don Reisinger thinks the future of gaming isn't in motion-sensing, but in something else entirely. Is he right?
Don Reisinger thinks the future of gaming isn't in motion-sensing, but in something else entirely. Is he right?
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.
Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.
Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes
Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes
First, motion sensing controls for the consumer market are still in their infancy. Who knows what might be coming down the line? Imagine a biometric-like glove that can sense the movement of each finger. How about gyroscopic head gear with a built in screen that allow syou to swivle your head and change perspective? Can you really tell me that these things, and who knows what else, are not possible?
Also, Wii Sports was a gimmick, but games like The Bigs, or Madden, of Tiger Woods PGA on the Wii are anything but. Are they the real thing, no... but I don't think I don't think any of the FPS games are 'real' either. Will they get better, I can't imagine them not. As a young boy growing up with an Apple IIC in the early 80's I remember dreaming of video games like what we're starting to see now. I can't wait to see what's coming down the line!
I feel the non-gamers love the Wii, because it is gimmicky and cheap. But that does not limit it to non-gamers, and gamers too can enjoy motion sensing when combined with other input devices. Zelda was an excellent Wii title that appeals to the casual gamers and non-gamers alike. More titles like this one that would explore the abilities of the motion sensing would bring people into the game, and into gaming.
Innovation is the gaming of the future. Everything has been done before! But being innovative and creative and thinking of doing the same thing in a new way will be the future of gaming, and motion sensing very much has a place there, combined with the traditional elements.
a list of the most popular games on wii:
-mario kart wii
-wii fit
-metroid
-Brawl
-super mario galaxy
-Zelda twilight princess
-and of course the infamous wii sports.
virtually all (good) and popular games are developed by nintendo b/c all other developers never want to take time to develop a game that works well on a nintendo system.
- by lepomp June 19, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
- The Wii is geared towards non hardcore gamers. And you know what that's not a "niche", that's actually mainstream. Nintendo decided to go after the people that don't want to memorize 50 combinations of buttons to press. Once the developers stop trying to make old games fit the Wii and develop games around the Wii, then you will see the innovation. Don't call it a gimmick, and bash it for it simplicity. I mean you own a Wii an must enjoy it to still be playing more than a year after its release.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 2 pages (30 Comments)