Comments on: Why is Microsoft even offering Windows 7 Ultimate?
Before the company upsets even more people, should Microsoft ditch Windows 7 Ultimate?
Before the company upsets even more people, should Microsoft ditch Windows 7 Ultimate?
Priceline, Classmates.com, and Orbitz say customers should read the fine print before complaining about being charged to join loyalty programs they didn't want.
Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?
Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.
Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.
Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes
Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes
P.S. I would upgrade to Windows 7 if home edition included both applocker and local security policy (group policy). Ultimate is just too expensive... so no upgrade for me
Do yourself a favor and install Ubuntu Linux and be done with getting riped off.
Because MS knows there are enough morons that will pay any price MS sets for their junkware!
Granted there are only 1% (or maybe even less than 1%) of Windows users who would use 7 Ultimate... think of it from a revenue perspective. It's not like 7 Ultimate is a completely different OS. So from the development point of view, MS developers didn't really spend that much extra time on it. It's just a few cool things here and there which I am sure they must have developed during their spare time.
Microsoft is tapping that less than 1% who are willing to pay more who otherwise would have only paid the normal price for Home Premium. That's extra revenue for doing nothing!
There don't need to be so many versions. They shouldn't be so expensive. In fact, if microsoft really wanted to win favour back they should be offering (almost) free upgrades from Vista to Windows 7. But no, they have shown time and time again that they are incapable of evolving.
The best thing they have done is help show people that if they are not happy there are alternatives.
Why "Ultimate"? Just a guess, mind you, but the phrase "ultimate cash cow" comes immediately to mind.
Beyond the choice of model there are many optional choices to make when buying an Apple computer. But it's nothing compared to the staggering array of models from various manufacturers that you have to wade through when buying a Windows PC. If you have trouble making your way through the Apple maze, you'll be positively stumped by the labyrinth of PC options.
Put simply, Ultimate is the only way to get the business level features and Media Center. At the most base level, it's the only way to have Media Center and to be joined to a domain.
- by July 8, 2009 9:37 AM PDT
- Sell a single version of the Core OS. Sell the add-ons separately a-la-cart. You can add features when you need them. Thats real choice.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 3 of 4 pages (161 Comments)This is just modern-day bundling and counting on a confused customer spend too much. "gee, I better get ultimate in case someday I may need bit-blocker".