Version: 2008
  • On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?

Comments on: Why is Microsoft even offering Windows 7 Ultimate?

Before the company upsets even more people, should Microsoft ditch Windows 7 Ultimate?

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 3 of 4 pages (161 Comments)
by queticomn July 7, 2009 8:42 AM PDT
Imo, M$ is also abusing their monopoly status in the p/c operating system industry using Economies of scale to leverage more cash out of their customers pocket book.
Reply to this comment
by mooseontheloose89 July 7, 2009 8:45 AM PDT
Isn't 7 Ultimate the only one that offers Windows Media Center and the Windows XP virtualization in the same package?
Reply to this comment
by shellcodes_coder July 7, 2009 10:39 PM PDT
Pro does that too
by vadik78 July 7, 2009 9:00 AM PDT
I am comfortable with WinXP, however there are some features I am looking forward too. One of such features is applocker, which is only available in enterprise and ultimate. Since home users cannot purchase enterprise version, the ultimate edition is the only way to get that feature.

P.S. I would upgrade to Windows 7 if home edition included both applocker and local security policy (group policy). Ultimate is just too expensive... so no upgrade for me
Reply to this comment
by razipix July 7, 2009 9:29 AM PDT
"I'm willing to bet that if you asked most Windows Vista Ultimate users how often they use BitLocker, they'll wonder what you're talking about." Thats not MS's fault.
Reply to this comment
by FF2009 July 7, 2009 10:00 AM PDT
the majority of Windows users wont know the difference between versions. There for they will spend $200 plus on Ultimate version every time MS releases the same OS every 2 years.

Do yourself a favor and install Ubuntu Linux and be done with getting riped off.
Reply to this comment
by queticomn July 7, 2009 10:09 AM PDT
or SuSE, Fedora, Debian, Slackware, (ubuntu is for yuppies and is a total Dibian rip). Theres also the BSD's to choose from, freeBSD an so forth. openSOLARIS is also very fun. All of these are free, and easy to install.
by sillygoosen July 7, 2009 10:05 AM PDT
Granted the 'ultimate' may be misleading... the fact that it's only $20 more isn't bad if you really want bitlocker or if there are other features we don't know about.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian July 7, 2009 10:17 AM PDT
There is no reason whatsoever to coddle the in-house slaves who never even look at the door. You only have to coddle the yard slaves who can see the wall and front gate.
Reply to this comment
by pentest July 7, 2009 10:38 AM PDT
Why?

Because MS knows there are enough morons that will pay any price MS sets for their junkware!
Reply to this comment
by abcd9009 July 7, 2009 10:53 AM PDT
I believe Microsoft is smart. There are some stupid people who don't really spend the time researching or comparing and just have way too much money to waste. Windows 7 Ultimate is for those people.
Granted there are only 1% (or maybe even less than 1%) of Windows users who would use 7 Ultimate... think of it from a revenue perspective. It's not like 7 Ultimate is a completely different OS. So from the development point of view, MS developers didn't really spend that much extra time on it. It's just a few cool things here and there which I am sure they must have developed during their spare time.
Microsoft is tapping that less than 1% who are willing to pay more who otherwise would have only paid the normal price for Home Premium. That's extra revenue for doing nothing!
Reply to this comment
by malu05 July 7, 2009 11:13 AM PDT
I think its interesting with the Laptop hunters ad campain, and the new strategy with providing a new OS every 3-4 years, and the price for the upgrades. I think apple is going to live large on the fact that their OS in "Ultimate" edition can be upgraded for just 29$ a stunning 191$ less than what Windows user have to pay and then like the laptop hunters ad show that they can purchase a iPod touch + OSX Snow Leopard of the same price as Windows Ultimate.
Reply to this comment
by slumbergod July 7, 2009 11:30 AM PDT
I think microsoft have just lost the plot. I am sure Vista was an ugly mess for most people. It certainly contributed to my switch away from windows!

There don't need to be so many versions. They shouldn't be so expensive. In fact, if microsoft really wanted to win favour back they should be offering (almost) free upgrades from Vista to Windows 7. But no, they have shown time and time again that they are incapable of evolving.

The best thing they have done is help show people that if they are not happy there are alternatives.
Reply to this comment
by kewell82 July 7, 2009 11:35 AM PDT
Steve Jobs should start a religion. I mean look at all the followers he already has on this site. He is a man people! He can't save you from your sins. So I'll see you all in hell.........from heaven because I don't worship Steve Jobs.
Reply to this comment
by kelmon July 8, 2009 4:12 AM PDT
No more drugs for this man/woman (delete as applicable).
by GlennAllen July 7, 2009 11:57 AM PDT
True, Win7 is to some degree a continuation of Windows Vista--over-priced & over-hyped while being somewhat "better" from the get-go, but I stopped caring so long ago. I expect my next new machine to have Win7 Pro on it, which I will diligently and dutifully authorize/activate, update, and backup... before I install Ubuntu and use the machine for the purpose for which I got it: read & write files and run apps. Maybe I'll re-install Win7 in a VirtualBox or somethin' (because Excel is useful and Calc isn't).

Why "Ultimate"? Just a guess, mind you, but the phrase "ultimate cash cow" comes immediately to mind.
Reply to this comment
by dw6800 July 7, 2009 12:59 PM PDT
I'm running RC1 on a Dell Precision 370 and i'm beyond impressed with this OS. As someone who's been critical of MS Windows, I'm really please with the stability of Windows 7. I use a data backup service from remotebackuppros.com, just in case, but have not needed to restore any files due to OS crashes.
Reply to this comment
by doelcm82 July 7, 2009 1:44 PM PDT
@ulrich2
Beyond the choice of model there are many optional choices to make when buying an Apple computer. But it's nothing compared to the staggering array of models from various manufacturers that you have to wade through when buying a Windows PC. If you have trouble making your way through the Apple maze, you'll be positively stumped by the labyrinth of PC options.
Reply to this comment
by bigbwai2000 July 7, 2009 1:50 PM PDT
Great article. And, David Coursey agrees with you. http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/blogs/stub/167974/windows_7_ultimate_edition_not_so_ultimate.html
Reply to this comment
by aka_tripleB July 7, 2009 2:16 PM PDT
I for one am thinking about a TechNET subscription. I can get a few licenses of Windows 7 Ultimate and other programs. I'll probably go for the $600 one so I can get the discs, but I'll also be able to get other software as well.
Reply to this comment
by Dan7637 July 7, 2009 4:47 PM PDT
mundo01 the reason XP is on netbooks is because thats the OS that most comsumers are familiar with and runs decently on those underpowered machines
Reply to this comment
by Thranx July 7, 2009 5:20 PM PDT
Once again Don doesn't know his stuff.

Put simply, Ultimate is the only way to get the business level features and Media Center. At the most base level, it's the only way to have Media Center and to be joined to a domain.
Reply to this comment
by DrtyDogg July 8, 2009 3:15 AM PDT
Pro does that also.
by July 8, 2009 9:37 AM PDT
Sell a single version of the Core OS. Sell the add-ons separately a-la-cart. You can add features when you need them. Thats real choice.

This is just modern-day bundling and counting on a confused customer spend too much. "gee, I better get ultimate in case someday I may need bit-blocker".
Reply to this comment
Showing 3 of 4 pages (161 Comments)
advertisement

E-tailers linked to 'scam' blame customers

Priceline, Classmates.com, and Orbitz say customers should read the fine print before complaining about being charged to join loyalty programs they didn't want.

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

advertisement

About The Digital Home

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.

Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Digital Home topics

Subscribe to the Digital Home podcast

Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.

Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes

Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes

Don's links
Don's Facebook account
Don's Twitter feed
Don's Friendfeed account
Don's Google Reader account
Don's Last.FM account
Don's Pownce account
Don's Flickr account
advertisement
advertisement