Comments on: Lawsuits or not, the RIAA still doesn't understand us
The recording industry will stop suing individuals and lean on ISPs to curtail piracy. Don Reisinger thinks this is just another example of the RIAA not getting it.
The recording industry will stop suing individuals and lean on ISPs to curtail piracy. Don Reisinger thinks this is just another example of the RIAA not getting it.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.
Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.
Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes
Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes
if something is stolen via file sharing thats one less person who buys it, multiply this by millions then the artists get no income, without income there is no point in producing new music.. Hence no more music.
I am quite happy to pay someone for something I like, I am not some tight fisted thief who steals copyrighted material (music, video,images, programs etc etc) as I see no point.
Also file-sharing and torrent sites are a hotbed for viruses and trojans as well as illegal and sickening pornography (I mean real sick stuff not the titillating stuff) and this whole area should be shut down and replaced by a genuine and controlled distribution network.. Personally I'd ratehr not have illegal stuff at home and more's the point I'd rather not have my machine full of viruses and Trojans with the risk of my machne being used in a spamming campaign or my identyity stolen.
Get real folks... Steal something often enough and it will no longer be available.. the RIAA is doing a valid service and I'm independent of the RIAA and its actions as I am based in Europe where the RIAA don't operate.
Be Legal, Be honest, Be safe, and have noting to worry over.
I do still pay for music, DRM FREE music that is. CDs, MP3 and iTunes Plus(DRM free AAC).
=/ maybe it's cuz i'm a file sharing noob, but i'm turned off. I don't really listen to much to a lot of national artists, most of where I'm at is the Local music scene. Local musicians need all the cash they can get, and I know that they keep that $10 I paid for a CD-R with a sharpie label.
as far as the RIAA is concerned, I carry a general distaste for any organization that functions as goon squad for corporations trying to get even more cash from the consumer. The Big 4? I'm not their biggest fan.
Long Live the Artists!!
CDs are dead. Lawsuits don't work , except in getting the hand that they bit to slap them, and cutting the ISP faucet off just proves that it didn't. The RIAA has lost already. They just don't know it yet.
...
Is he being serious?
- by davewc39 December 29, 2008 11:42 PM PST
- HERE YOU GO PEOPLE: Here's my opinion regarding RIAA sneaky bullcrap. They suck as an industry due to the fact they put out CRAPPY music that SUCKS. As consumers we will NOT buy into their Bullsh**. I want to thank the "Supreme Court Judges" for protecting the consumers when they said this, "Judge Davis threw out the verdict in the case because he argued that "actual" distribution of copyrighted music must be proven for the law to be violated. Simply making the content available is not a violation of copyright, under this reasoning." Thank you Judge Davis, this is infringement of consumers rights just like same sex marrage regarding Prop 8 in California. People have Constitutional Rights, its the not businesses. AND IF YOU (BUSINESSNESS) don't like then start producing better music and start producing 5-8 minute Long Extended Version, instead of that piece of "crap" 3-4 minutes short version that nobody want to hear in their car. As for the ISP, they have a job to do, WHICH TO PROTECT THE CONSUMER. If you don't like it RIAA, then go back to the recording studios and start giving the consumers what they want, otherwise we AS CONSUMER WILL DRIVE YOU UNDER THE BUS, where you belong.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 3 of 3 pages (125 Comments)