Version: 2008

Comments on: Why is Blockbuster always late?

Blockbuster is late to the set-top box film space. And as Don Reisinger points out, it's being late that has made Blockbuster trail competitors.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by setgo November 25, 2008 10:51 AM PST
I'm through with BB. They made me buy a movie that I brought back late reversing their former policy of just adding a restocking fee. I never heard that the policy was being reversed. So that's the last $20 they will get out of me! Hope you didn't spend it all in one place.
Reply to this comment
by somone_else November 26, 2008 3:12 PM PST
That's not a policy change. that was introduced with the "no late fess" policy. I believe you get charged for the movie if it's 30 days late. Personally I don't think that's unreasonable.
by scriptedfate November 25, 2008 10:52 AM PST
>Call me crazy, but if you're an executive at a company that is clinging to the past and trying desperately to turn a business around that has been hammered from all sides by competitors that offer a more compelling service, wouldn't you want to be first to the market?

Tell that to the RIAA, insisting on CDs and the MPAA insisting on DVDs in the first place. I agree with you that pure digital multimedia is the 'way of the future', but those associations... yeesh.
Reply to this comment
by aztec92154 November 25, 2008 11:09 AM PST
I sure hope BB doesn't disappear. I still like walking up and down the isles looking for movies. I still dont think XBOX has got it right.
by youngjm November 25, 2008 11:32 AM PST
With all these services, the caps being put in place by the ISP's could now affect more than just those who the ISP's are trying to limit.
Reply to this comment
by ofmyony November 25, 2008 12:23 PM PST
Here is a site that offers consumers accurate dates of new release movies and other older movies newly released. check it out it is accurate and organized. I use it all the time to update my queue in Netflix.

http://videoeta.com/
Reply to this comment
by gauispetronius November 25, 2008 1:21 PM PST
What everyone forgets is that BBI did dip its feet in streaming video to set top boxes in 2000-2001. It was in partnership with Enron's broadband service. They teamed to provide a trial movie service using Enron's fiber network and IP set top boxes supplied by Motorola (not the former General Instrument part of Motorola so the STBs didn't work well either). It was small, just a few cities (in Utah and NJ if I recall correctly). The partnership was terminated after about 3 months. BBI said there was no supportable business model for the operation and Enron claimed it made $150M on the enterprise.

6 months later BBI dissolved its New Media Service Group (shortly after 9/11 when no one was paying attention) and buried its head in the sand for another seven years.
Reply to this comment
by cyberDJ-2038765336053745013836 November 26, 2008 3:12 PM PST
This further proves how stupid BB was if they were dabbling in video streaming before the iPod/iTunes juggernaut had landed.
by AnthonyNYC November 26, 2008 5:48 PM PST
BlockBuster was up the block from me, I was in there everyday and one day, I returned a movie 10 minutes past the return time at noon, and was charged a late fee, this is going back years.
I asked to speak to the manager, and explained I thought this was so unfair and that if they charge me this fee, they might as well close my account here and now, as I will never rent from them again.
The so called manager said, there is nothing he can do it was in the computer already, so I asked for my account to be closed and never rented from them again, 7 years ago!
So that so called manager thought a late fee was more important than a satified customer?
It is not only this one instance, everything about BlockBuster is not looking forward to what is good for their customers. No thinking, they follow rules set in stone by out of touch mangement.
They had blacklisted certain titles because the mormon owners thought they were inappropriate, what?
What are they in business to make money or to preach morality?
I am glad they are finally are going under or will soon, they were never a very bright company.
Reply to this comment
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About The Digital Home

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.

Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Digital Home topics

Subscribe to the Digital Home podcast

Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.

Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes

Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes

Don's links
Don's Facebook account
Don's Twitter feed
Don's Friendfeed account
Don's Google Reader account
Don's Last.FM account
Don's Pownce account
Don's Flickr account
advertisement
advertisement