Comments on: Steve Ballmer: We don't need to be cool! (Or maybe we do)
Steve Ballmer is neither cool nor innovative. That is why Microsoft continues to struggle.
Steve Ballmer is neither cool nor innovative. That is why Microsoft continues to struggle.
Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.
Verizon and Motorola are spending big bucks--$100 million--on marketing the new smartphone, and it looks like it will pay off with 1 million devices sold by year's end.
Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
It seems to me that Apple is almost irrelevant to the real world in terms of being any sort of threat to Microsoft. Yes, it may have the desktops of the the "arts and crafts" crowd which make-up less than 1% of the entire comuting universe. Yes Apple has a cool phone, but who is actually doing anything useful computing-wise on their phone except e-mail and GPS?
Microsoft's R & D budget is more than Apple's revenues, so let's be real. Apple survives because Microsoft does not want to take them out. Microsoft makes lot's of money from Apple in both software and IP.
And what about back-end infrastructure? What is Apple's market share in servers? Practically nil. Not even a blip. Linux in all of its variations has more clout han Apple. I'd put in Linux before I'd put in Apple. The main reason the hackers don't go after Tiger as much as Windows is because they know that Tiger isn't protecting very much valuable data, it not that it is inherently that much more bullet proof. You will see the percentage of incidents against Windows seriously decline as Vista and Server 2008 get deployed. All of the corporate environments I know of are planning upgrades to Server 2008 because of its superior performance and hardening.
My user don't care if it's cool. They care only that it works.
How can Apple be irrelevant when Vista is nothing more than a copy(an extremely poor one) of OSX? How can the follower be irrelevant and a clueless follower relevant?
Vista doesn't work, so you are failing your "user". Pretty sad you only have one customer.
There was nothing 'wow' or 'cool' about them, their company or their software 25 years ago and there certainly isn't now. Microsoft has a long, well documented history of stifling innovation and competition to reduce R&D costs.
In my opinion, IT support people push microsoft products in the marketplace to guarantee themselves employment. Consumers on the other hand want software which is easy to use, funtional and reliable without having to rely on (and pay for) support on a regular basis.
Apple doesn't even figure in this discussion (although I just mentioned them ... drat!) as microsoft is its own worst enemy as evidenced by their lack of desire or ability to provide functional software (which would certainly elicit 'cool' and 'wow' from me).
Ballmer? Did I say anything about Balmer?
One entertaining aspect of writing comments is that it always brings out the Freudian aspects of a certain group of people. I really don't care which of your oxes got gored, but maybe you need to get it patched up.
By the way, I consider your personal attack ("simpleton") as high praise (you spelled it correctly), particularly when coming from someone who doesn't know that every word which ends in an "s" does NOT require an apostrophe before the "s", to wit: "...makes lot's of money..." [http://your post of 10 July, 0839; you know, the one starting out with the pontificating "Ahem".|http://your post of 10 July, 0839; you know, the one starting out with the pontificating "Ahem".] By the way, you missed a lot of opportunities to insert apostrophes. Just thought you'd like to know that, so you can be consistently wrong next time.
I don't mind the personal attacks from someone who obviously has nothing to do, but from someone who has the "apostrophe-s" problem, and who can not write and keep the tenses and persons of their grammatical constructions correct (again: the 'Ahem' memo:
"...My USER DON'T care if it's cool. THEY care only that it works." ), I feel that this attack has little merit. Next time, I would appreciate personal attacks from a quarter of much higher caliber.
- by mlhader July 10, 2008 12:49 PM PDT
- I am surely relieved that you care more about a couple of accidental typos and that you actually care less about the content of what was said. Perhaps you value style over substance?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by MSSlayer July 10, 2008 4:39 PM PDT
- Wow, so he is rich that must mean he is smart or something.
- Like this
-
(12 Comments)True, you did not name Ballmer, but reference to "a fifty-something, fat, bald technological-know-nothing" certainly implies that you were taking a free shot at Microsoft's CEO. If not, you were certainly generalizing about some group of males that you find annoying. Of that point, I can agree though it is a cheap shot. (By the way, Ballmer actually talks like that. With his millions, I'm sure he could care less what any of us think about his speech, appearance or supposed, lack of technical prowess).
At least we know that you drink from the cesspool of greed.
Ballmer is an idiot with no tech or business skills. Just a blowhard working as hard as he can to throttle MS and keep everyone in IT down.