Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: 10 More Most ANNOYING Characters On TV

Comments on: Google's fallibility: Daycare that only an elitist could love (and afford)

Google wants to be the best on the planet, but it's increasingly growing impatient when its employees expect it to live up to its own hype. Daycare is just the latest example.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Mam00th July 6, 2008 6:21 PM PDT
The fall of an empire the rise of another. Although I do not particularly like Apple, I have to admit they are gaining strenght.
Reply to this comment
by Karl-Lessig July 6, 2008 8:07 PM PDT
I want to know what Google's doing for the pets, what about the pet care? Is there a Google Doggie Concierge?
Reply to this comment
by blabtech July 6, 2008 9:17 PM PDT
So Google is going a step beyond...

http://blabtech.blogspot.com
Reply to this comment
by Beenthinking July 7, 2008 8:22 AM PDT
As a CEO of start ups, there are two things you worry about, 1. Raising money, 2. Culture. Google is no start up so they don't have to worry about raising money. However Culture is such a hard thing to manage and its so important to the success of the company. Also, you rarely know when you're getting it right, but you always know when you've got it wrong. Google has made a blunder culturally speaking. They've done a great job on so many things that I'm sure they'll figure this one out as well.
Reply to this comment
by TheStairMaster July 7, 2008 9:10 AM PDT
=/ surely there are better ways to spend our time then commenting on the over-priced nature of Google's corporate daycare system. i knew The Times had time to report on stuff like this, but surely we could all do something more beneficial with our time, like take a walk, or go to the pool, or finish our latest jigsaw puzzle we haven't gotten around to finishing.

^^, just messin with you guys. have fun.
Reply to this comment
by madjack74 July 7, 2008 12:28 PM PDT
This is yet another ***** in the armor. Google is going the way all big companies go. As the company gets bigger the management, investors, and employees best interests continue to diverge. Management thinks of the employee's as interchangeable parts in some great machine that only they have the brain power to understand. To this end they craft a company that rewards the 2% of people at the top of the organization, whom though their own massive hubris, believe are the only truly valuable resources. Eventually the employee?s figure out that the reward the receive is no longer commensurate with the work they do and they either leave to find greener pastures or take up what I like to call the ?work minimization? strategy. That is to say they start to optimize for doing the least amount of work possible to still receive their pay checks in an attempt to bring their reward more in line with the work they do. This is a very inefficient working dynamic and in the end totally screws over the investors in the company. I sat though half my career at Microsoft watching this dynamic slowly eat away at the once amazingly efficient company until all that is left now is empty lumping hulk waiting for someone to come along and eat its lunch. The only difference I see between Google and Microsoft is how much faster Google seems to be heading down the curve.
Reply to this comment
by alsingle July 7, 2008 5:24 PM PDT
This debate is not about whether or not people should have children or even about Google's misguided corporate culture. I wouldn't go as far as the author to suggest that subsidized or free day care is a "right" of employees, but I think that in the rare instance when a company does decide to offer day care, it ought to be reasonably priced. I think the author's key point is that Google decided to "upgrade" its day care system solely because of a single wealthy employee with close ties to senior management and a desire to artificially manipulate the long waiting list. I doubt that the majority of people who read this article can afford to spend $2300 per month on day care for one child. I have a six figure annual income and I can't afford to spend that much on day care. Does that mean that I don't deserve to have a child because I can't afford to spend that much on day care? No. Maybe the government should start issuing permits to people who can afford their children before they allow them to give birth? Here's a thought, why don't we just limit childbearing to people who have 4-year college degrees and a net worth that is sufficient to afford Google's day care program?
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Google's mobile hopes go beyond Nexus One

The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
• Photos: Unboxing Nexus One

Using your smartphone safely

faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here