Apple advocates have always promoted the Mac as a better computing platform. Now, however, we actually have "gateway drugs" to get people hooked on the beautiful aesthetics, ease of use, and coolness of Apple technology through the iPhone, iPod, etc. We
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
About The Open Road
Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
The Open Road topics
As a business traveler, protecting my computer is of utmost importance.
Currently, Macs do NOT offer accident coverage and their applecare protection is extremely limited. I have a Macbook Pro and in terms of quality it's awesome. But in terms of protection, apple doesn't do much after selling their products. Compared to IBM ThinkPads (Lenovo) I used to have or Toshiba that I considered, Apple does not provide enough hardware support. With ThinkPads or Toshiba, if malfunction occurs, they will replace the computer for you.
Of course, with boot camp, you can now run Windows. I guess Apple finally realized their own OS is useless to anyone who uses a computer for something other than web browsing and multimedia production.
For a little while, I considered getting a mac, but then I realized I actually like freedom.
Keep in mind that most end users use the Mac/PC as an appliance. It checks email, surfs the web, types reports and gives them access to their music. In that case, usually the Mac user will have a better experience out of the box as most PC OEM's do suck (bloat ware, preinstalled trial crap) unless you pay more money.
Us PC enthusiasts are a different breed though. We build to our own specs, install what we want, how we want, when we want. Whether it's trying out a linux distro on a old p3 machine (just to see if it works), or custom modding your case, building a OC'ed quad core, 4 gig, 9800 GTX x2, running Ubuntu 8.04, XP and Vista (and in virtual box for kicks...). We're not who the typical OEM's and Macs are selling to. So we really shouldn't come down on either. To us... they both suck. lol.
As for work, I know I could never use a Mac. I don't see enough legacy support for interfacing with routers and other server side hardware. Do Macbooks have old serial ports for interfacing with hardware via terminal? I don't know. Does any hardcore work get done on a Mac (banking, data centers, ISP & hosting, & all that server side yummy stuff )?
I'd be interested in finding out what machines are actually hosting all that lovely Itunes material. Unix?
Lets think about this one for a second....
Rightttttt.... Mac wins.
Maybe 1 in 1000 users assembles their own computer. If you're that one, great, go build your own PC 'cos Mac isn't for you. But that doesn't mean Mac isn't good for the other 99.9% of users. That makes this argument a non-starter, yet I see it trotted out every time the Mac/PC debate comes up. Put it to bed already.
Switched to Apple 6 years ago and have personally switched dozens of people.
- by bleech May 19, 2008 1:53 AM PDT
- It is a very well known fact that the Mac environment [as user experience] has an inverted learning curve. As such, it is very easy to start using them. But that makes them very difficult as a heavy productivity tools, as for image treatment, and other computing tools heavily based on eye-hand detachment.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by jolysmoke May 23, 2008 6:19 AM PDT
- Sad that this "well-known fact" seems to be so rarely seen and heard.
- Like this
-
Showing 3 of 3 pages (98 Comments)Thing is: the more movements and visual interface you have [such as swashing commands, and so on], the less productive the tool tends to be.
And for that, I did switch from Mac into Windows.