Comments on: Ubuntu, its time has come
As Microsoft adds more features in order to justify its existence/maintenance renewals, watch for Ubuntu to fill the gap with an easy-to-use, consumer-facing product line.
As Microsoft adds more features in order to justify its existence/maintenance renewals, watch for Ubuntu to fill the gap with an easy-to-use, consumer-facing product line.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
* The hype is out in front of the delivery, or at least Canonical's current ability to deliver. Alpha geeks are seeing serious issues of 'robustness' - a collection of issues around QA, bug fixes, failed upgrades, stupid Ubuntu policies etc. Some of the issues are generic problems, and the over hype exacurbates, and others are just structural issues with Canonical / Ubuntu development process and understaffing.
* A realisation that relative to other players, e.g. RH, Novell, or even Sun, Ubuntu don't really contribute anything back into the various communities (kernel, GNOME / KDE, Firefox, OOo). For example, for a company that is supposedly 'ignoring the desktop' RH have quite a big desktop team that dwarfs Canonical's team - same for Novell and Sun. Ask yourself this: Of all the great features in Ubuntu, which were developed by Canonical? Easy wireless setup - RH/Novell (mostly), OpenOffice - Sun/Novell (IBM?), Firefox - Mozilla/RH/Novell, F-spot - Novell, Evolution - Novell, Totem - RH, Accessibility - Sun. Of course all those projects had varying levels of community contribution. Granted, Canonical have done a great job making all that easy to install and setup and adding some polish, but people are starting ask: What are they contributing back?
Now tihs doesn't mean much for Ubuntu / Canonical in the short term. They have a huge fanbase and positive press and momentum, plus none of this is unfixable. But if they continue to lose appeal to alpha geeks (many of whom are migrating back to Debian, or trying out Fedora, now that RH are screwing that up less) then their longterm picture isn't so rosy.
Ubuntu itself has mainly been about taking what already exists and making it easier to use, which is something I've always thought we could do with a great deal more of, this 'polish'
If other distros can easily take this ease of use and integrate it back into their own efforts then that would be a contribution worthy in and of itself.
But yes, stability has been an issue over the last year; when I select that I have a 1680x1050 screen I explicitly do no want to be limited to a 1440x900 max resolution, the stupid just burns. User friendly interfaces are all very well, but they're no use if you're having to fight the computer just to get it to do the most basic things.
http://tech-talk.biz/2008/04/21/microsoft-apocalypse-2018/
- by kiwibuntu April 27, 2008 2:27 AM PDT
- It would be a shame if some "alpha geeks" felt they couldn't continue working on Ubuntu. But it should be remembered that the popularity of Ubuntu is boosting Linux as a whole (not least of all Debian). The more widespread Linux is, the better the hardware support we can expect, the better the documentation, and so on. And Ubuntu/Canonical represents the best hope for Linux long-term in my view.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(5 Comments)