Comments on: Open source's "superficial impact" on the database market
According to a 451 Group report, open-source databases aren't having much of an effect on traditional enterprises. Is this a bad thing?
According to a 451 Group report, open-source databases aren't having much of an effect on traditional enterprises. Is this a bad thing?
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Thanks for the comment. Can't argue with the fact that the first finding is a glass-half-empty view, but it is balanced with a positive view of the prospects for the future. And in the report itself, we do give credit to MySQL for making a sector its own. As I wrote yesterday http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/03/26/open-source-database-adoption-widespread-but-shallow/ "The 451 Group expects the adoption of open source database management systems to continue apace. The adoption of open source software for non-mission-critical applications and new projects will continue, and we expect to see open source databases gradually surround proprietary database deployments. At this stage, mainstream customers will begin to reevaluate their core database management offerings and examine whether open source is a viable option for mission-critical applications."
Thanks for the comment. Can't argue with the fact that the first finding is a glass-half-empty view, but it is balanced with a positive view of the prospects for the future. And in the report itself, we do give credit to MySQL for making a sector its own. As I wrote yesterday http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/03/26/open-source-database-adoption-widespread-but-shallow/ "The 451 Group expects the adoption of open source database management systems to continue apace. The adoption of open source software for non-mission-critical applications and new projects will continue, and we expect to see open source databases gradually surround proprietary database deployments. At this stage, mainstream customers will begin to reevaluate their core database management offerings and examine whether open source is a viable option for mission-critical applications."
- by Travis5650 March 27, 2008 5:46 PM PDT
- Like any report, the devil is in the details. I don?t have access to this data, but I wonder how much effort or study was done in the emerging market regions? I suspect there is a tendency to be N.American focused in interpreting where and how technology adoption and maturity is taking place. The emerging markets are only now looking to build their IT infrastructure to support government and SME entities. They are utilizing oss as much as possible. These build outs will require a higher degree of enterprise grade or mission critical sw. The US and general EU regions have largely been fleeced by traditional vendors which should not be much of a shock to anyone.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(3 Comments)