Comments on: Open source: The new patent regime
Open source has a way of making the intellectual property regime much more efficient, and much less complacent.
Open source has a way of making the intellectual property regime much more efficient, and much less complacent.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
The risk is that this can be turned around: proprietary patents can be filed and used against open implementations unless they offer an olive branch patent license. I can see this happening in niche areas where proprietary license fees will be high and make up for the patent troll stigma.
- by Penguinisto November 12, 2008 12:21 PM PST
- It ain't just "yesterday" that Open Source is good at driving... almost all of the eye-candy and gee-whiz things that MSFT and Apple have added to their repetroires have come straight out of open-source projects: tabbed browsing, widgets (Vista puts its collection of them a "sidebar"), 3D desktop effects, journaling filesystems, and a list of things that would take way too much space to list in its entirety.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by mbenedict November 12, 2008 5:29 PM PST
- 3D desktop effects did not come from open-source. For example, SGI (Irix) had 3D desktop effects long before any open-source implementation, primarily because 3D hardware was very expensive back then, and was generally only available on high-end graphical workstations. Now that I think about it, even hardware 2D support was rare in the open-source world back then (I remember needing to buy commercial XWindow servers for FreeBSD to get 2D acceleration).
- Like this
-
- by Penguinisto November 13, 2008 3:51 PM PST
- Granted on Irix and JFS (forgot all about them...) but you still have to admit that there were many innovations taht came straight out of OSS.
- Like this
-
(5 Comments)Commercial journaling filesystems also long predated open-sourced ones. IBM's JFS had its full production release in 1990 as part of AIX. Veritas came out around the same time.
Open-source journaling filesystems weren't available until 10 years later. According to Wikipedia both ext3 and ReiserFS were introduced in 2001. But by then, every major commercial OS already had journaling (Solaris, AIX, HPUX, Digital, Irix, etc). Even Windows already transitioned to a journaled NTFS by then (with NTFS v3, introduced in 2000).
There were even earlier incarnations of journaling file systems in the commercial world, such as Xerox's Cedar FS which had journaling since the late 1980s, but these were more research-oriented than production-ready systems.