Comments on: PC manufacturers seek shelter from Vista's drizzle
PC manufacturers are trying to turn Vista into something more than Microsoft, but they're failing, and would find more success with Linux.
PC manufacturers are trying to turn Vista into something more than Microsoft, but they're failing, and would find more success with Linux.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
excellent once my hardware was all compatible,
just want to add another gig of ram and i am great for a few years..
security is excellent the UAC is great for alot of average users who i have worked with and click willy nilly!
VISTA IS AWSOME!!
I think if the boys and girls at Microsoft weren't so greedy they would release a version of Windows that was 64 bit, but could run Legacy Apps. But they won't. Losers.
"VISTA: as pretty and compatible as a MAC, but without the stability."
I sure would like to fail like Vista. 40 million copies sold last quarter and 180 million copies to date.
Vista rocks.
Never forget that a blogger is no substitution for a professional news reporter.
Furthermore, I know plenty of people who HAVE decided to upgrade after some tentative fears. You know what? We all like the system. No one crashes, no one has problems at all, so I am wondering what kind of things these people are trying to do that are causing these issues. All of my software also works (and I have a LOT of it). Seriously, give it a rest.
"Perhaps Dell, Sony, etc. should band together with Adobe, Google, and others to create Linux-based computing experiences for consumers and/or enterprises."
That should be quite interesting to see happen.
Adobe: Nearly viral-like tendencies with Acrobat, hideously high prices for their products, and SS-like enforcement of all licensing.
Google: They already said you have no privacy- and that now extends to your data online. Do you want to have them in your computer looking at your data too? Pass.
It's an interesting idea, but not very realistic. It would be better to stay on the ground to deal with these issues instead of keeping your head up in a 'cloud..'
People complain about Microsoft, but I find it a little difficult to justify the fact that Acrobat, essentially a one-trick pony, costs more than almost all versions of Office.
She also still uses XP on her desktop at home. After the learning curve on Vista, every call I get is some Vista problem: wireless flakiness, health care application compatabilty problems, and performance lagging (this is a 3 GB laptop!). I ask her about XP and she says, it just works. Sorry like Ballmer said, Vista is a work in progress.
They are better off in their walled garden with OS X and Macs, making their ungodly profits.
I also use linux (Ubuntu) and have to rebuild or fix things on a regular basis if I install something that isn't from the Ubuntu repository. As stability goes - linux is where windows was ten years ago. No drivers, little choice in software and unstable.
Between that and a certain amount of software that just won't work (yes, I know about compatibility modes thankyouverymuch) I'm sticking with XP for Windows work. It's like the argument a lot of people have against Linux when compared to XP: my software doesn't work on it and it won't play all the games XP does.
Yes? Ten years ago it was 1998. I don't remember any Linux distribution (or OS/2 or whatever) as unstable as Windows 98. This thing could crash from just being idle.
>>No drivers, little choice in software and unstable.
Oh, that's really weird. Have used Linux since 1999, from Slackware 4.0 to the newest Kubuntu, including experimental things like Fedora on hardware ranging from 80386 4MB to Pentium D and never experienced any such things. There are just people who can screw everything up and then put the blame on the manufacturer. (I can say this happens to Vista too, though to a lesser extent)
- by myksomerville August 31, 2008 4:19 PM PDT
- We have Vi$ta on two machines here, and XP on our NAS storage. Even through a Wireless-N network with Gigabit wired connections, Vi$ta struggles to break 2MB/sec throughput on the network. we have found it is easier and faster to burn the necessary files to DVD or two and transfer them that way; still faster than waiting for Vi$ta. This has soured our computing experience to the degree I doubt we'll buy M$ again - either Mac or Linux from now.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(28 Comments)