Version: 2008

Comments on: Making sense of a VMware acquisition of Red Hat

VMware is rumored to be interested in buying Red Hat, but it doesn't make sense.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by kit_plummer August 21, 2008 11:34 AM PDT
Even as a purely "marketing"-oriented move I think VMware has something here. Both companies appear to be bearing the burden of saturation. Technically, I agree I'm not sure the "stack" fits. But, hey both Sun and Microsoft have plays in this game. So, maybe VMware should have an OS under the umbrella...or more appropriately RedHat should have a VM under its.
Reply to this comment
by kit_plummer August 21, 2008 11:35 AM PDT
Even as a purely "marketing"-oriented move I think VMware has something here. Both companies appear to be bearing the burden of saturation. Technically, I agree I'm not sure the "stack" fits. But, hey both Sun and Microsoft have plays in this game. So, maybe VMware should have an OS under the umbrella...or more appropriately RedHat should have a VM under its.
Reply to this comment
by jrepenning August 21, 2008 11:43 AM PDT
Tricky bit is: the apps that make the very most sense to virtualize are the old, leftover, legacy ones running on P3/sub-GHz doorstoppers, whose code was long lost to history. Hard to acquire.
Reply to this comment
by rcardona2k August 21, 2008 12:27 PM PDT
Technically, Red Hat is not much a fit for VMware. VMware spent serious R&D to eliminate the Service Console from ESX, which is based on a Red Hat derivative. And VMware also touts JeOS, Just enough Operating System, which is NOT what RH Enterprise Linux is.

On the other hand, VMware could take commanding interest in shaping Red Hat's future in virtualization around ESX compatibility and Xen and KVM. This would provide the market potentially with a "second source" provider of a hypervisor and an OS designed run on both ESX with openvmtools and VMI . Second source virtualization could come from Xen or KVM investments. VMware has been on the sidelines with virtualization in the Linux kernel, aquiring Red Hat would increase their level of participation.
Reply to this comment
by The_Decider August 21, 2008 5:38 PM PDT
I think it is a pretty good match and could be a response to what Novell did with Xen in OpenSuSE 11.0. Installing xen, and configuring VM's is now a few clicks and a reboot (although the kernel used for this doesn't play nice with nvidia's video driver, which isn't a big deal if you want to virtualize servers on top of an OS, but it is annoying to me in my office grr....) and you are up an running.

"Are there particular applications that lend themselves well to virtualization?"

Yes, and RedHat is often the vendor of choice for these applications to run on.
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement