Comments on: Drone aircraft may prowl U.S. skies
Can unmanned aerial vehicles doing domestic surveillance safely share the skies with airplanes?![]()
Photos: Unmanned aircraft keep watch
Can unmanned aerial vehicles doing domestic surveillance safely share the skies with airplanes?![]()
Photos: Unmanned aircraft keep watch
January 5, 2010 8:11 AM PST
January 5, 2010 8:04 AM PST
January 5, 2010 7:16 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
I can see and hear a manned helicopter, so I know it is up there above my house. A LAC resident will have no idea that the government is above their house zooming in on them, and this could be for a sustained period of time. So, a citizen has no idea they are being surveilled. If a helicopter is shinning its bright light on my home for a sustained period of time, then I'll know about it and have the opportunity to petitition my government for redress of gievances).
2. Not currently feasible to monitor citizens unless probably cause is established. However, that will change.
It is extremely expensive and difficult to patrol the city 24/7 with a manned helicopter. These drones currently cost $30K a piece, and that price will go down. Within a few years it will not be out of the question to have dozens, or perhaps, hundreds of these things circling the sky watching all aspects of daily life. So, it will be feasible to surveil entire areas of the city on a 24/7 basis. With no one even knowing about it. This is not possible now. Helicopters are prohibitively expensive, so they are utilized in a limited fashion - say, for chasing suspects. But with these drones, the budgetary constraints are lifted and therefore probable cause will not necessarily be a limiting factor any longer.
3. Will inter-department checks and balances be implemented?
How is a county legislative body going to monitor the Sheriff's use of these drones? How will local legislators know that they are being used AFTER probable cause has been established. Will the Sheriff be required to obtain a warrant before they can fly surveillance missions over the homes of "suspects," where search warrants were not obtained or obtainable? Who will oversee the use of these devices? What standards will the Sheriff have to meet before they can fly a drone over a given area of the city? Who will create these standards? Where are the checks and balances?
4. This can be used to monitor local gov't officials as well.
What if someone other than the current Sheriff comes to power. Let's say George Bush III becomes the next Sheriff in town and he decides to use these silent, always pervasive flying eyes to "get dirt" on the local gov't officials. Who will be there to stop this activity? Will the folks that oversee the program have the power to curtail it?
If gov't officials are going to seriously evaluate implementing these new technologies, they need to make sure they can closely limit their use and manage their downside risk. If they are going to use them to help law enforcement catch bad guys, where a warrant exists or probable cause has been established, then great. But this technology is incredibly enticing, and it will be easy to justify expanding its use. What gov't officials have to do is make sure that any expansion of its use is publicly discussed and decided upon within the appropriate governmental body, because it will be very easy for law enforcement to use this technology however they see fit.
hahahhahhahahha!!!!!!!!!!
Get a video camera then contact the Feds.
There is no privacy, it is the nightmare of George Orwell's 1984 and when I can I will leave this country
and find some South pacific to live on.
- by jetmech1121 August 11, 2009 8:31 AM PDT
- goverment will not be happy till we all have locaters in our ass.call your reps in congress.this unacceptable to a free society. they have used 9/11 as an excuse to treat americas whole population as criminals.this technology can be seriously misused and eventually will. remember NSA is still listening to us.dont be sheep. its probably too late.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(14 Comments)