Version: 2008

Comments on: Restaurant at end of universe not so far off

Executives and government officials discuss commercializing space exploration. Hint: There will be a Starbucks.
Photos: Soon-to-be-bustling space hubs?

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Hate to be pedantic...
by ross brown--2008 September 20, 2006 8:21 AM PDT
But "The Restaurant at the end of the Universe" wasn't at the
physical end (that doesn't exist), it was the chronological end of the
universe where Milliways could be found.

I know, I know... I'll go get a life now.

Ross
Reply to this comment
I'll join you...
by thedreaming September 21, 2006 8:33 AM PDT
I love his books and I saw the british mini series based on his books. It's really too bad that the american version of the movie turned out to be such crap. Some books don't translate well into movies.. Oh well.
It's a nice dream, but . . .
by Mark Shapiro September 20, 2006 9:05 AM PDT
I like space exploration as much as the next guy, but can we please
pay just a little more attention to qualitiy of life here on the home
planet? It's where those of us without the $200k for some hours in
orbit continue to live.

Hard to argue that our space program doesn't subsidize these
tourist ventures.
Reply to this comment
It is the ONLY way....
by mdburkey September 20, 2006 9:44 AM PDT
If we focus on social programs and the quality of life here, we will never get ANYWHERE -- that is the road to stagnation and socialism.

Sadly, the only things the make the human race as a whole progress forward are profit & entertainment.

1) Space exploration will never advance unless someone can find a way to make money off of it. This is true for almost anything.
2) Other than "survival items" (food, etc), the only real high return money makers are entertainment related.
3) The primary source of initial entertainment related money are "early adopters" -- i.e. the bored rich (or geeks with no sense and lots of debt!).
4) Providing these entertainment items is what keeps the majority of us employed.
5) "Neat" entertainment projects are where about half the technology that makes everyones lives better originates from (and the other half usually started as a military project).

Additionally, we NEED space exploration -- and eventually expansion into space. We are rapidly using up Earths resources and even with perfect recycling and conservation, they WILL eventually run out. Similarly, throughout history, when one group of people couldn't stand the other, they left and went elsewhere (sometimes involuntarily) -- but anymore there are no empty places on Earth left to go to!

In other words we can:
1) Quit having babies -- ain't gonna happen.
2) Fix the standard of [low] living to a set level imperpetuity -- not a popular idea.
3) Quit using all our modern conveniences -- which would pretty much mandate #1 -- we can't support the number of people on Earth NOW without them.
4) Learn to live with each other and quit fighting -- yeah, right.

Or, develop somewhere else to get resources from, move polluting industries off planet, give people somewhere new to expand into, etc.

The choice is either (a) expand into space or (b) descend into a new dark age after the near inevitable collapse of civilization (when we run out of resources).
View reply
The world population is growing exponentially...
by technewsjunkie September 20, 2006 6:51 PM PDT
The population of China is?
At the rate we (the world) is growing, how long can we go without
being in each others faces?

Not to be alarmist here but think about it. Oil is not finite, our
natural resources are not finite. Rationing WATER is common.

Commercialization of space exploitation is a good idea.
View reply
World's oldest joke...
by Richard Schmidt September 20, 2006 10:41 AM PDT
The food is good...
... but the place lacks 'atmosphere'!
Reply to this comment
Microsoft to take on space travel?
by Seaspray0 September 20, 2006 2:58 PM PDT
Oh, come on! They're trying to take on everything else.
Reply to this comment
Imagine...
by technewsjunkie September 20, 2006 6:46 PM PDT
I only wish I could live 100 years from now to see a city on the
moon, or...
Reply to this comment
Re: Imagine...
by AjoyBhatia September 23, 2006 7:07 AM PDT
That's possible if medical science advances enough to increase our lifespan, not necessarily to live upto 100 years from now, but just enough to live until cryogenics develops. Then, we could just get frozen and wake up 100 or more years later, but I wouldn't really want to do that. Imagine.. I wouldn't know anyone alive, most probably, and would feel very disoriented, like a person from the Stone Ages.
100 years?
by make_or_break September 24, 2006 12:11 PM PDT
The manner in which humanity and international politics are, now and in the foreseable future, 100 years doesn't seem like it will be enough time to finish the ISS, let alone build the first colonies on the moon.
100 years?
by make_or_break September 24, 2006 12:13 PM PDT
The manner in which humanity and international politics are, now and in the foreseable future, 100 years doesn't seem like it will be enough time to finish the ISS, let alone build the first colonies on the moon.
When do space tickets go on sale?
by eSpaceTickets October 26, 2006 6:09 AM PDT
So far space tourism is for ONLY the rich and famous. What would you do to go to space? Would you play a silly game to win a trip to space? Would you build your own rocket and strap it to your rear end? Do you ever see yourself ever having the slightest chance of ever going to space? If you ever won a trip to space would you end up selling the ticket and pocket the cash? Do you want to go to the Moon?
Reply to this comment
(14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement