Version: 2008
  • On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10

Comments on: Voting with a fork: The politics of food

"What to Eat" author Marion Nestle aims to set the record straight on the politics of food in the U.S.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Nestle: reliable voice of the nanny state
by nicmart April 28, 2006 5:33 PM PDT
Nestle is an unreconstructed Naderite leftist. The reflexive answer
to all problems is "more government."
Reply to this comment
No, not "more government"
by dysonl April 28, 2006 11:27 PM PDT
but less corporations.
It's like "groovy man"
by Dead Soulman April 29, 2006 5:25 AM PDT
Come on people. I hate to sound like the cynic, but how is this related to understanding technology. This is clearly "pro-flower power granola forcefeeding" propaganda. It's ridiculous. This is nonsense and a selling pitch to buy "organic foods".

Now, I do agree that our meal portions are way out of control. I've gone to restaurans and have had to take the rest of my meal home, which has fed me for two additional days. It's outrageous how much food we're expected to eat these days.

This is not a balanced article. It's a clearly an intentionally mistitled pro-organic foods article. Don't call it "Voting with a fork: The politics of food." It should've been called "Voting for organic foods: Our agenda."

Anyway, leave to San Franciscans to lead us straight onto the yellow brick road.
Reply to this comment
Agreed...
by Betty Roper April 29, 2006 10:52 AM PDT
This is politics, not technology. Reeks of elitism.

The big bad American food industry, so often criticized, has provided a better standard of living for more people than at any time in history. Many parts of the world *wish* they had the problem of "too many calories".

There wouldn't be a so-called epidemic of obesity in this country if people just exercised more self-control.
discuss the merits of the subject, not the author
by thanhvn May 1, 2006 12:20 AM PDT
Ummm, I have no idea what political leaning the author has, nor do I care. What we should be discussing here is the merits of the subject at hand, not the personal beliefs or the political leanings of the author (unless they bias the evidence or the conclusion). What I take away from this article is that the food industry (and related) benefits from people consuming more food and they will do many things to get people to consume more food. Getting the message out so people understand this fact and that eating more is not necessarily healthy is a good thing. It's much like getting the message out that smoking is not good for your health. Once people understand these points and still choose to do things to damage their health anyway, then it's their fault, not the fault of the food and tobacco industries (within certain marketing behaviors, of course).
Reply to this comment
A comeback is in order "Foriegner4" ; Organic Pro Talk:
by Pop4 May 1, 2006 7:08 AM PDT
Lend me your ears. Bottom line and further outcome to this woman's constituancy is to either IPO or increase grocery prices in the 99% consumer market beyond a current 29%-50% indexing. I began my produce industry career at a (-3%)-22% consumer index which closed out when the organic industry bewildered its first triple net lease.
The value of 'Organic Produce Shopping' is a cancer cure! No doubt the gal I am referring too is a zelot and should have been paid and not a free spot on the news in Phoenix Arizona. "no names"?
Reply to this comment
Ignorant Bliss!
by Mister C May 1, 2006 8:05 PM PDT
Dim wits that never even passed HS Biology much less a college level Biology or, god forbid, college Bio-Chem class rant on about things they have no more knowledge of then what they got from Fox news!

They dismiss all they do not understand, that is until their kid nearly dies from eating tainted food. Then it is all about ?why didn't the government do more to protect us!?

Before you Rocket scientists blow this off you may want to have a talk with someone who actually understands the issue, say a college Biology of Bio-Chem teacher.

Those who know, have been complaining for years that the primary concern of the food industry is profit. Safety is secondary and only when it hits them in the wallet, is it a real issue.
Reply to this comment
Even before the 'Vegan' craze ABCO (formerly Alpha Beta 500-600) $vegiwash.
by Pop4 May 2, 2006 2:43 PM PDT
Do you wash your spinach? Well then, there are already USDA mandates on pestisides to maintane current yeilds in the produce industry. And plenty of (protobioteniques) to the .00001 for the beef industry. What? Now we use "Avian Flu" to invade every constituant that plants a crop using Canadian money in the north of South America. Come on California Organic growers and their Florida citrus partners even have New Jersey flanking the 'Vegan Food Piramid' on their "Farmer Market" brand of food products. Just Do it!
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement