Comments on: Ozone hole living longer than expected
Keep that sunscreen handy. The hole in the ozone layer will last 15 years longer than expected, scientists say.
Keep that sunscreen handy. The hole in the ozone layer will last 15 years longer than expected, scientists say.
December 1, 2009 11:37 AM PST
December 1, 2009 10:54 AM PST
December 1, 2009 10:47 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
There's also the fact that the ozone is created by ultraviolet light. When the poles are dark, they get very little UV exposure, and much less O3 is created.
CFC's are also heavier than air. So when they leak out, they tend to pool in low lying places. Thats one of the safety concerns when working with coolents. You can be asphyxiated if not careful. Even out doors with a slight breeze, if the ground is depressed even slightly, it will pool.
http://www.epa.gov/ozone/science/volcano.html
Volcanoes causing this problem is a myth. Manufactured chemicals causing this problem is an established fact at this point. There have been various studies to prove this.
http://www.radix.net/~bobg/climate/weight.argument.html
Your weight argument makes no sense. Fortunately on this matter your ignorant opinion was not followed.
All natural occurances of CFC's are what they are, part of nature. This means it is part of earths ecosystem, so it part the balanced system. Everything we add to it, disrupts the balance.
Don't forget we are dealing with chaotic systems here, small modifications can have big consequences. Ever heard of the quote: "If a butterfly claps its wings in London, a thunderstorm in Moscow is the result of it?"
There is no reasoning with these people - it's a religion to them, and no amount of science or reason will convince them. It's as bad as trying to discuss evolution with a fundie.
- Save the ozon leyer
- by 208774626618253979477959487856 December 13, 2005 12:38 PM PST
- http://www.analogstereo.com/cadillac_owners_manual.htm
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(12 Comments)