Comments on: MIT: To keep coal, carbon needs to go underground
Coal will remain king for power generation for decades, but new carbon storage technologies are needed, MIT says.
Coal will remain king for power generation for decades, but new carbon storage technologies are needed, MIT says.
January 8, 2010 11:59 AM PST
January 8, 2010 11:47 AM PST
January 8, 2010 10:02 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
problems"? Like, maybe, sudden death of those into whose
"backyards" the CO2 might suddenly leak? Hopefully, that would be
improbable. However, the "nimby" phenomenon has been
mobilized by less dire prospects, as for example in the case of the
mere possibility of an unsightly wind turbine becoming marginally
visible to well-heeled property owners in various places.
The CO2 would be pumped into the ground then processed back
into O2 by whatever means that could be developed. Algae farms
might be a good start.
I'm glad people are looking seriously at CO2 sequestration, if only to show how ridiculously impractical it would be, and how easy it is by comparison to bury nuclear waste.
- by Hydrogeno2 June 16, 2008 6:44 AM PDT
- Who's bright idea was it to put CO2 underground , please step forward and receive the dummy award of the year, it would have to be a guy with a degree and bloody no common sense, and on the Coal industry pay roll, do they think we are all stupid out here in the real world, wake up and smell the roses and thrust me mate there are no fairy's at the botton of the garden.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(10 Comments)