Comments on: GE chief: All engines go for alternative energy
Jeffrey Immelt, who spearheaded GE's Ecomagination initiative, sees favorable conditions for investment in a range of energy technologies.![]()
Jeffrey Immelt, who spearheaded GE's Ecomagination initiative, sees favorable conditions for investment in a range of energy technologies.![]()
December 27, 2009 9:15 PM PST
December 27, 2009 7:45 PM PST
December 27, 2009 4:50 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
It's "nice" that the BP's and Exxon's and other 'Capitan's' of U. S. industry have thrown dollar's to help solve 'global anthropogenic related problems' -- but those dollars need to focus on what can be done -- and that starts with the horrible -- seemingly anti-business word -- Conserve!
Regarding growing biomass for energy purposes -- a process already exist -- that turns cellulose into renewable nature gas -- a vehicle, engine and everything power fuel -- that has a very, very important co-product -- without waste products or negative environmental impacts -- a valuable soil-amendment -- organic fertilizer. I can send you loads of stuff on this aspect of the process. Equally importantly, the biomass is not burned.
The places that such can be done on a large scale -- economically and without negative impacts on the soil or the environment are tropical or semi-tropical. Further, a study published more than 30 years ago in India, required -- even for the fastest growing plants -- that ground water was not affected; such was when annual rainfall averaged near 60" per year. There are lots and lots of places in the tropics and sub-tropics equal to that or even vastly greater than that amount of rainfall -- trouble is that most of you live in the western and northern areas where such is not the case -- that amount of rainfall is equal to or exceeded in most of Florida.
Best, Dick
Dick Glick, PhD
President
Corporation for Future Resources
1909 Chowkeebin Court
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Phone: 850-942-2022
Fax: 850-942-1967
Email: dglickd@pipeline.com
URL: www.CorpFutRes.com
http://wire0.ises.org/entry.nsf/E?Open&project&00031306
Their are other sources of wasted heat such as that from an inefficient fuel converters (car engine, electric motors) yet no one en masse is trying to recapture that energy.
hydrogen does not exist in nature without being bonded to something else. We can use electricity to break the bond between hydrogen and oxygen in water but it takes more electric power than the hydrogen will yield.
I think electric cars will become more common in the future even if there is no progress in battery design simply because they use much less energy. I doubt very much that hydrogen will be involved.
If we are going to use internal combustion engines in the future they will most likely be diesels. We can make the fuel oil from soybeans grown on farms (known as biofuels ) or keep pumping it from the ground. It will always be cheaper and cleaner to burn biofuels than hydrogen.
Co2 is not a problem with biofuels because the plants remove CO2 from the air as they grow, and it is returned to the air as it burns. The cost of making biodiesel is about 2 dollars per gallon. The issue is how much farmland can we devote to fuel.
Look at Hawaii State Tree the Candle Nut Tree.
Its nuts are 15 to 20% oil thats simmilar to kerosene. It would make a good supplement to existing alternatives.
Nuclear power is the benchmark. France has the lowest carbon footprint of any industrial nation and is the world's largest exporter of electricity because 75% comes from nuclear power plants.
Judged against real world benchmarks at total generation costs of five cents a KWH, solar cells generating electricity, for example, have not made an honest dollar on net. An honest dollar is a profit turned in competition with the real world without subsidies. It is interesting that so many are willing to put so much faith in things that deliver so little at such high costs.
It is good that Mr. Immelt says all the right things concerning alternative energy so that GE will get good press.
It would be more helpful, however, if Mr. Immelt would also pay attention to the facts obvious within his own corporation. If you are serious about reducing CO2 and you want a modern industrial society and you want to send your kids to college, support your local nuclear power plant.
- Ecomagination is green washing
- by IvanONeill April 15, 2007 3:45 PM PDT
- This article is press release, not news. CNet is eroding the standards of journalism by acting as the loud-speaker to GE's corporate message. GE is attempting to paint its dirty operations a shade of green.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(13 Comments)Yes, GE is at least addressing the issues confronting us in an energy-constrained future. GE deserves some credit for that.
But, GE is currently spending lots of money to erode proposed efficiency standards for locomotive engines. http://www.cooleremail.net/users/betterworld/GO_gNews2007February.html
The article also says GE is "thrilled" with the results of its Ecomagination drive that has seen the company reduce greenhouse gases 1% the last several years. ARE YOU KIDDING??!? One percent is a laughable achievement. Reductions on the order of 5-10% annually are needed. GE could and should do more.
Finally, "clean coal" is an oxymoron of the "pollution free hydrogen car" magnitude. Sequestering carbon and pumping it into an acquifer or depleted oil well will cause serious environmental damage. Instead of acid rain, we'll turn our filtered acquifers into giant lakes of acid. This is truly the power of Ecomagination.