Comments on: Inside Toyota's hybrid factory
The plant at Tsutsumi aims to build 1,900 cars a day. When there's a problem, the music gets downright cheery.
The plant at Tsutsumi aims to build 1,900 cars a day. When there's a problem, the music gets downright cheery.
January 2, 2010 6:26 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:56 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:16 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Talk about constrained supply! I believe that I'm no different than anyone else: I want to test drive before I purchase.
Can you imagine how many of these vehicles they's sell if they could actually get them to a sales lot? In Texas (I've really only researched Austin, Dallas, San Antonio, and Houston), Priuses are on 6-month waiting lists.
Like I said, Toyota sells as many as they desire to sell.
drivers?
gratitude, not scorn.
But, I fear now that the falling gas price would again make these hybrid less attractive.
Toyota Prius also is very aero dynamically efficient with low drag design.
If people were really concerned about reducing fuel consumption, they would drive cars like the (no longer in production) Chevy Sprint (or Suzuki/Geo Swift). It got 44-49mpg (~20 YEARS AGO). It was a purely 48HP ICE. The EPA rating on the 1988 Sprint was 55mpg city/ 60mpg highway.
If Americans really want to reduce consumption, then they should drive cars with 40-60hp engines. The only reason hybrids exist, is because we want the peppy acceleration (yeah, we all want to be racecar drivers) and couldn't bear a car with a 0-60 time of 15-20 seconds.
Buying something like a Hummer and then throwing in an extra $10,000 to add a hybrid drive train is a little bit like buying a private jet to take you to Paris so you don't have to pay extra to hear the in flight movie.
The hybrids seem to fair much better on the EPA estimate tests as compated to standard gas cars, but real world results are not as exagerated.
The reality is the $11,000 (34/40 MPG) Yaris isn't as far behind the $23,000 (60/51) Prius as the EPA estimates would have you believe.
The cars are actually pretty comparable in size and features and the reality is that you will never drive enough miles to actually see the $12,000 sticker price manifest into gas savings.
The reason you buy the Prius is not for gas savings though, it is so you can get a hybrid badge to remind the rest of the world that you are better than we are.
I am sorry I took time away from your tree planting ans stuff for you to read this, but don't worry. You should be able to make up for it tomorrow as you drive past me from the carpool lane.
I think the government should give hybrid people stickers so they can sit at the front of busses and cut to the front of lines too. You people are on a mission and I wouldn't want my reasoning and logic to get in your way.
?Limits to growth? (http://www.answers.com/the+club+of+rome?gwp=11&ver=2.0.0.453&method=3). If they were right, we would probably barely, even, live today!
Björn Lundahl
Göteborg Sweden
Björn Lundahl
Göteborg, Sweden
The market isn't magic - it cannot create something out of nothing, it cannot make a supply when none exists. As much as you may wish otherwise, it cannot "make" any new fossil fuels.
Body style means a lot to me as a customer. It doesn't have to stand out, but it does have to be somewhat attractive to my eye. I can't drive a box like that Scion or whatever it's called, and I can't drive some little hatchback like the Prius. I need something with more bite, like maybe a Sebring Hybrid...
As for perpetual "magnet motors" or other "over-unity" devices, they only work as gimmicks to separate the gullible from their money.
your neighbors how awesome you think you are. I'm glad that it
is monumentally more efficient than the typical SUV and
somewhat smaller (less threat to others), but we're definitely
seeing the same idiot bozo aszhole drivers in them. Only instead
of parading how great their kid is at soccer, they're parading
how holy they think they are because their big ugly car with an
unknown true environmental impact (think: massive battery
disposal) gets "great" milage (although still less than a TDI jetta
in real-world driving). Bogus, bogus, and more bogus.
I can't wait until the moronic california solo-passanger-hybrid
carpool BS is cancelled. If solo access to carpool lanes is about
MPG, then make MPG the qualification. Same for emissions. But
to grant access based on buzzwords? That's stupid.
- Replacement Toxic Rechargable Batteries?
- by kieranmullen April 9, 2007 12:55 PM PDT
- It will be fund paying for these in 5 years never mind having to go through the hassle and recycling. (I dont know how much of it is recyclable)
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(27 Comments)KieranMullen