Comments on: Fuel cell vehicles still in first gear
Study finds fuel cell vehicles will only make a big dent in oil consumption and greenhouse gas emissions with years of work from government and industry.
Study finds fuel cell vehicles will only make a big dent in oil consumption and greenhouse gas emissions with years of work from government and industry.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech reporter Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.
Add this feed to your online news reader
The issue isn't that difficult to solve, provided that all of the technologies that CNET has reported on do work.
Its almost as bad as listenting to Al Gore whine, yet while he was in the white house as VP, he did nothing to help create more nuclear plants (the cleanest and most environmentally friendly energy source.
I'm all for getting off oil but we need real solutions not fantasies propped up by our tax dollars.
Just search google duh.. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&fkt=484&fsdt=7109&q=mercedes+hydrogen+bus
Here Europe is, with all their 50-70 mpg diesels and hydrogen fueled BMW 7, and the US media completely ignores them. Just a bunch of hitler hating panzies who want to do things the "merican" way. Well boys and girls, time to tighten those fanbelts around your waists and get ready to be paying $20 for a gallon, because YOU caused it by not conforming to the rest of the civilized world.
Electric cars are the answer. Coming soon (well, sooner than hydrogen or diesel) to a GM dealer near you: http://www.gm-volt.com
Diesel may be more expensive, but that is offset by the fact diesel engines last 500k- million miles, and get DOUBLE the mileage of gas. So prices would have to be double what they are now. Which makes no sense why everyone is biyatching about the price. The only ones doing it are the truckers, and that's because they're too stupid to own a Mercedes ACTROS. But don't blame them, blame the US EPA.
http://www.emercedesbenz.com/May08/30_001172_New_Mercedes_Benz_Actros_Recorded_As_Worlds_Most_Economical_Series_Production_Truck_By_Guinness_World_Records.html
Diesel is set to make a sonic boom comeback into the US market soon.
The BMW may be a concept, but it works and is in use BEFORE toyota came along with their model which they're only giving to "celebrities" like what BMW did.
Energy Environment Forum
Cheers !
Oh wait, no, that would make too much sense wouldnt it? Keeping american dollars in america? What am i thinking?? I must be as crazy as Al Gore....
Transitioning to a new fueling infrastructure is a complex endeavor, requiring a multi-lateral effort involving multiple industries. As a representative of the Hydrogen Education Foundation, I am helping people understand that energy companies such as Shell, Air Liquide, and Chevron, and the Department of Energy are working to establish additional hydrogen fueling stations across the country. An initial $10 to $15 billion investment, equivalent to about one month of military spending in Iraq and the amount of government subsidy for ethanol (described above), would establish an initial refueling infrastructure within 2 miles anywhere within the top 100 metro areas and along all US highways.
Although, creating a hydrogen fueling infrastructure is complex, it is achievable and simpler than it appears. Hydrogen has been used for decades by other industries, such as agriculture, oil production and even food processing (ever heard of the term ?hydrogenated?? ? take a look at a jar of peanut butter or the wrapper of a Starburst). More than 40 billion kg of hydrogen are produced globally each year with production plants located near or within every major metropolitan city in the US ? enough to fuel 130 million fuel cell-electric vehicles annually. Since hydrogen is used to produce gasoline, switching from gas to hydrogen to fuel our transportation is achievable.
To learn more about the benefits of hydrogen, we invite everyone to please visit and ask us questions at www.h2andyou.org.
Then there is the high cost of H2 fuel. The combination of electrolyzer, compression for storage, and fuel cell takes 3x more electricity than a charger and battery does, so cost of H2 fuel will always be much more than the cost of electricity.
Then there is the lack of H2 refueling facilities. The electric grid goes almost everywhere, and outlets are abundant, and building parking lot chargers is considerably cheaper than building H2 refueling facilities.
The future is electric.
- by jatopolski May 6, 2009 6:21 PM PDT
- I think the Cash for Clunkers is a great deal for the low income society. However, the majority of low income people cannot afford to make payments for a new car and probably could not qualify for a loan either. I do not think it is right to make it so they can only use the voucher on a new vehicle. It should be for any newer vehile within the range of the voucher. I do feel, however, that the voucher be established only to purchase another vehicle, or in another sense , "swap" a clunker for a "newer" vehicle that is econmically fule efficient. The way it is to be set up now unfortunately is giving the upper class another advantage.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(16 Comments)