Version: 2008

Comments on: Chasing the Toyota Prius' 50 mpg nirvana

CNET News' Martin LaMonica, an early buyer of the 2010 Toyota Prius, finds that the car gets good mileage but there's clearly more to learn.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 4 of 5 pages (211 Comments)
by Bodysafe July 12, 2009 12:55 AM PDT
Hi. Are you sitting down? I have a solution to help ALL drivers/motorcyclists to keep us WITHIN Speed Limits at the blink of an eye.The Speed Saver , Speed Awareness Indicator. No more continually reading speedo numbers. No more annoying speed alerts .No more cruise controls and possibly sleeping with that fixed throttle.Please check out www.bodysafe.com.au
Simple, but it WORKS
Hoo Roo
Reply to this comment
by ClaerNPresent July 12, 2009 6:27 AM PDT
You sure will, cut your time "in this world" in half after your next major accident waiting-to-happen.
Reply to this comment
by eeee July 12, 2009 8:12 AM PDT
Oh; so what?
I still drive my 2000 Intrepid and still get 32-33 mpg on strictly highway driving and I know how to use math to compute the mileage after I tank it back up. I dont bother with trip computers that add a few MPGs to the displayed amount like every Prius driver out there.
And No there is no sludge since I always change my oil every 3,000-3,500 miles since the very first used car when I was 17 years old so dont be slamming my 2.7 liter Mopar V6 motor (dont drag up that MYTH that all MOPAR motors are built by Mitsubishi (that 1st gen Minivan had the optional Mitsu motor) but that issue ended MANY years ago
-Why am I dragging this old fact up???
Just to show that old stories and old prejudices live on forever in the most illogical manner.
I wont be buying any Japanese cars no matter where they are made when I still have a choice to buy something that generates some profit that will stay in our American economy. Until we have a world where we all are brothers and there are no country boundaries, that is the way I see it as far as my spending dollar.
Reply to this comment
by dargon19888 July 12, 2009 10:19 AM PDT
What a smug bastid. Sorry, but this 'article' is nothing more than an excuse to publish his reasons for purchasing a hybrid and trying to make himself feel good about it.

Unfortunately the realities of hybrids don't pan out and frankly the author would have done better buying a new VW diesel. Great gas mileage and without the expense and issues of a hybrid.

The author could also have leased a car for the next xxx years as a way to postpone a car purchase which would give him time to determine the viability of future models.

All this shows is that the author suffers from SVS (Silicon Valley Syndrome). Usually this is when a person in IT feels that their abilities increase based on their proximity to Silicon Valley. But for this author, I believe that he too feels its effects because of his smugness and need to brag about his new purchase.

Oh and for the record... I'm still driving my old 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee. Its got 110K on it, and well since we have to transport dogs and haul lots of things, its got plenty of room. Since we live in the city, I and my wife can walk to work, and even walk to the grocery store unless we're doing a major shopping trip. Meaning we don't have to drive everywhere. Unlike the author who lives in the Californian sprawl and the LA motto "Nobody walks in LA" is pretty much true for the entire state. By keeping my old car on the road and limiting my driving, I actually have less of a carbon footprint than the author, even though he drives a new hybrid. Sure I understand his need for purchasing a new car. But had he lived in the city, then his car would have been in the garage. Or instead of buying a new car, he could have just switched to a car service like Zip cars. But no, he has to drive everyday to get around.

I ask that the author go to hulu and see the South Park episode on Smugness.
Reply to this comment
by eeee July 13, 2009 5:19 AM PDT
Exactly !!! No Thanks! on a Prius for me or any other hybrid for that matter !
by cchanote July 12, 2009 10:21 AM PDT
In my opinion, the auto makers are preparing themselves for the move on fuel cell. First, they would like to see how electric motor performs. Once the fuel cell are in place, it is a matter of time before taking out the gasoline engine and place it with fuel cell, and there you will a fully electric cars. Please see the transition from gasoline to fully electric.
Reply to this comment
by queticomn July 12, 2009 10:31 AM PDT
FORD EcoNetic Fiesta manufactured in Europe. 66.3 mpg.
Reply to this comment
by martin1212 July 12, 2009 11:05 PM PDT
It's not really comparable as the two cars are in different size categories. The Fiesta is quite a bit smaller and less powerful (88hp vs 134hp)
by mutualin4mation July 12, 2009 5:21 PM PDT
My Kawasaki 500R gets 50MPG easy. Plus it can go 0-60 in 3.7s and you can park at least 4 in the space of one Prius. When is the government going to get smart and ban cars in favor of motorcycles!
Reply to this comment
by cwerdna July 12, 2009 7:08 PM PDT
Yeah, but motorcycles aren't subject to the same emission requirements as cars. CO2 emitted is directly proportional to the amount of fuel burned (it's higher for diesel since diesel has higher carbon content). See http://www.epa.gov/OMS/climate/420f05001.htm. Emissions of pollutants such as carbon monoxide, nitrous oxides, particular matter, etc. are not. See http://www.wheels.ca/article/334875, for example.

You can lookup pollution scores of vehicles at http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/sbs.htm and see what they translate into at http://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/detailedchart.pdf. You can also go to t http://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/. Select Look Up, check both checkboxes and select 2009, California. Sort by air pollution score. You'll see the Prius and many other hybrids and non-hybrids do VERY well in the air pollution department (doesn't include greenhouse gas emissions).

.
by markosph July 12, 2009 6:59 PM PDT
Didn't the 88-91 Honda CRX HF get about that much per gallon. I don't want to quote Wikipedia, it says 49 city 50 plus highway.
Reply to this comment
by The Noble Robot July 12, 2009 8:23 PM PDT
I drive a 2006 Prius and I've been getting 54-55mpg in the summertime, and closer to 48-51mpg in the winter (the big difference surprises me every year). My wife drives the car to work (highway driving), so that's probably why it's so high. Additionally, while we live in a major downtown area, we bike and walk most places within the city, which cuts down (naturally) on city driving.
Reply to this comment
by martin1212 July 12, 2009 10:31 PM PDT
Just bought a 2010 Prius just a few days ago, in fact I think it is the same as the author's model, with moonroof+solar roof. Average for the first tank was 52mpg without driving any slower than usual, ie going with flow of traffic or slightly faster. The ECO light is the single most useful feature to improve fuel economy as it shows visually that a very slight reduction in acceleration has a very significant impact on economy. I'm sure it would be possible to do better but at a certain point you start impacting other drivers, which is probably not a good idea.

Having not owned a car for several years, I have rented dozens of different vehicles over that time, and I'm happy to say that the new 2010 Prius it a really great car. I'd be happy to own it even if the fuel economy was nothing special. Test drove the Jetta TDI as well before chooseing. The Jetta was nice enough but lacked the hatchback and looked rather spartan inside. (IMHO of course.)
Reply to this comment
by veggiedude--2008 July 12, 2009 11:55 PM PDT
If you care about the environment, change your diet to a meatless one. It has far more impact than giving up your car for a bicycle.
Reply to this comment
by kbellve July 13, 2009 4:54 AM PDT
How many smugs/mile do you get with that car?
Reply to this comment
by randallhsmith July 13, 2009 6:05 AM PDT
I think you all missed the boat. The Prius is still operated by an inefficient gasoline engine (otto cycle engine). The diesel engine is far more efficient. Everybody that I know that has a FULL SIZE diesel powered car drives in a normal fashion and gets between 40 and 50 mpg. I drove my full size gasoline powered pick-up truck in a VERY efficient and unrealistic fashion (55-65 mph highway and 45 mph off main highways) with the cruise control set and very light on the gas pedal (pissing off everybody behind me), and the best I could get was 18 mpg. A guy I work with drives his full size dodge diesel truck in a NORMAL fashion and averages 20 mpg.

Also, if your toyota/honda hybrid breaks down, you better have a H/T dealership nearby because most mechanics wouldn't touch that powertrain with a 10 ft pole. The technology is too new. Whereas, diesel engines are very simple, and any mechanic would work on them.

Mercedes and Volkswagens are all emission certified to be sold in California.

The diesel cars are very quiet. My co-worker has a Mercedes E-series diesel that is so quiet, you have to listen carefully to discover it is a diesel powered vehicle.

Enough said.
Reply to this comment
by islandgirl45cv July 13, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
Consumer Reports rates the Honda/Toyota hybrids very high in reliability, so evidently "your toyota/honda hybrid breaks down" comment isn't based on reality.
On the other hand, the VW diesel you and other commenters have promoted has a dismal record of reliability. I know someone who had to replace the entire engine in his diesel 2000 Golf tdi and the car was only 7 years old!
No thanks, I'd rather have the mileage AND the reliability of a Prius.
by randallhsmith July 13, 2009 2:17 PM PDT
Nice to know that Hondas and Toyotas are bulletproof. Islandgirl needs to get off that island. All cars break. All I said is that Mercedes and VW diesels are all emission certified in California. If your "bulletproof" honda or toyota hybrid breaks in the sticks (according to Islandgirls, this is purely hypothetical and has no basis on reality, especially since all H/T owners are religious in maintenance and care of their cars) you are screwed.
by randallhsmith July 13, 2009 3:05 PM PDT
Oh...and by the way...Honda sells diesels in Europe, Toyota sells diesels in Europe, Subaru sells diesels in Europe, Nissan sells diesels in Europe, BMW sells diesels in Europe, Peugeot sells diesels in Europe...need I go on.

I believe that Toyota distributes their level of quality to all of their cars, not just the Prius. So, Island girl, Toyota diesels are practical and reliable and get better real world gas mileage than Toyota Hybrids. Is that apples-to-apples for you?

Diesels have superior low-end torque when compared to gasoline (standard gas or hybrid gas) engines. This should mean alot more to those of you in the mountainous regions of america.

Diesel technology is very viable, and due to our enormous amount of HWY driving, a better option than a hybrid.
by PenguinedOne July 14, 2009 2:00 PM PDT
Actually, the Prius uses an Atkinson cycle engine, not otto cycle.
by Buick107 July 13, 2009 8:22 AM PDT
I bought a motorcyce so I can go 120mph and still get 50mpg!
Reply to this comment
by FroZone July 13, 2009 9:16 AM PDT
I have a 95 Metro that consistently gets over 50 mpg.
Reply to this comment
by drara07 July 13, 2009 9:55 AM PDT
Hi,

One of my friends owns a prius and he manages to get a milleage over 60 in summers. Winters is harsh in Minnesota but he still manages 48.
He's a very calculated person and researches everything. The trick to get a higher milleage in Prius he says is all in the braking. The braking power on the wheels is actually converted to the charging power for the battery. So if you start braking slowly from a long distance till you come to a stop, you would have transferred that entire energy into the battery and nothing goes to waste. Brake too hard and only a part of the energy is transferred and the rest is lost. Also, try driving as much on battery as possible. On his car, upto 37mph, the car runs completly on battery so in city he tries to keep it within that speed limit.
The best milleage he has got so far has been 632 on 9.8 gallons of fuel and he drives a mix of city and highway.
Reply to this comment
by john_bloy July 13, 2009 11:22 AM PDT
A Prius may be an "economy car", but no way is it a "green" or "environment friendly" car. Due to manufacturing and disposal.
Reply to this comment
by martin1212 July 13, 2009 11:38 AM PDT
@john, you are wrong. Please review some of the refutations in this thread for details.
by askgees July 13, 2009 12:46 PM PDT
That would be due to the fact that you swallow anything with the term GREEN in it instead of using you're brain. That may very well make you one of the dumbest greenies we've come across. LOL. Also anyone that would use the term GREEN regarding the Prius is obviously a little confused with the term GREEN. Building a car that houses a 3'x3' battery that needs to be disposed of and labeling it GREEN is a farce and a lie. It's actually a bigger problem than a regular car. Just the waste from the Prius is impossible to deal with let alone 20-30 different models from every manufacture. Some how VW built a diesel that gets 58 miles to the gallon and doesn't carry a 3'x3' toxic battery to dispose of. Battery powered or assisted cars should be banned.

Global warming is as much of a threat as Y2K was. It?s a fantasy. Building an economy on fallacies only leads to disaster. The entire plan is pathetic and a waste of time and money.

The Post office, nearly out of business is only able to remain in business by delivering several billion pounds of junk mail a year or in other terms A MILLION TREES.
The US is simply a disposable nation. Just about everything is made to last a very short time. It all contains plastic.
Billions of water bottles litter the US yet we have not banned them. Billions of plastic bags from trash to grocery bags clutter the land fills. We?re beyond the point of no return. And yet they still mass produce these items. No bottles smaller than 2 liter should be legal. All else should be can or some other disposable container like cardboard.
Paper bags should replace plastic bags. Paper is RECYCLYABLE.
Some id10ts think building huge wind farms is the answer. Sure if you looking to destroy the wild life. Other then that it?s simply an ineffective eye sore.
This is only surpassed by the brilliant idea of football field size mirrors. LOL sorry I had to wipe the tears out of my eyes. LOL

Some of these are reasonable ideas if applied properly. I hate to break the news to you but wind power has been tried time and time again and guess what. IT FAILED. Solar power can be used effectively but only if applied on a home by home basis not the STUP1D PLAN they?ve come up with. If it we?re a law that each home contain a solar grid to produce hot water or heat we could reduce the elec use by 1/3. This is a fact and proven in Israel. The US use to be a leader now we?re simply wandering around like ret@rds. It?s quite sad to see what has happened over the last 25 years.

One thing is clear. The US is in it?s last days as the worlds greatest nation. Nice knowing ya.
Reply to this comment
by martin1212 July 13, 2009 1:18 PM PDT
@askgees, firstly it's not clear who you are replying to - try using the Reply link and then the @ symbol to identify the original posting. Secondly, throwing out insults is not cool. (By the way, it is "your brain" not "you're brain".) I spent some time researching the battery situation. As I said, others here have posted more complete links debunking the environmental issues, but the simple fact is that the battery is not thrown away at end-of-life, it is recycled. Toyota will take it back:

http://www.hybridcars.com/faq.html#battery

If you have some real arguments about why the above is invalid, present them, but don't just repeat easily debunked myths.
by bvdon July 13, 2009 12:58 PM PDT
I tend to drive as fast (always stay with the flow at the very least) or a little faster than most. I love it when the slow pokes get stuck at a light by a few seconds. They lose at least a minute or two right there, and waste gas sitting at the light. Only occasionally will you find me at a light next to a smart ass slow poke.
Reply to this comment
by islandgirl45cv July 13, 2009 2:58 PM PDT
"by randallhsmith July 13, 2009 2:17 PM PDT
Nice to know that Hondas and Toyotas are bulletproof. Islandgirl needs to get off that island. All cars break. All I said is that Mercedes and VW diesels are all emission certified in California. If your "bulletproof" honda or toyota hybrid breaks in the sticks (according to Islandgirls, this is purely hypothetical and has no basis on reality, especially since all H/T owners are religious in maintenance and care of their cars) you are screwed."

randallhsmith needs to calm down and take his meds.
If your diesel breaks "in the sticks," you're likely to be just as screwed as the guy I know who paid half of the cost of his original car to replace his diesel engine with a "new," read scavenged, diesel, and was without a car for three weeks. Go to Consumer Reports and compare used car reliability records yourself. I didn't make them up.
Reply to this comment
by randallhsmith July 13, 2009 3:19 PM PDT
You just don't comprehend well. Any mechanic can work on a diesel. Is that a hard concept? No electrical ignition system in a diesel...very simple. I don't challenge Consumer Reports; I use them for car purchases myself. I just won't buy a hybrid because the technology is too new and complex.
Showing 4 of 5 pages (211 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech reporter Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here