Version: 2008

Comments on: What's the carbon footprint of your handwash?

Planet Metrics releases test version of Rapid Carbon Modeling software for retailers to calculate and reduce the embedded energy in their products and operations.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by dbargen June 16, 2009 7:53 AM PDT
Better Question:

Who in their right mind cares?
Reply to this comment
by why do i need a name? June 16, 2009 9:25 AM PDT
oh, you beat me to it!
by harchh June 16, 2009 10:56 AM PDT
Exactly...
by The_happy_switcher June 16, 2009 8:19 AM PDT
Slow news day. I guess they couldn't find any Apple v. Microsoft topics to start a new flame war and generate numerous page/ad hits. lol
Reply to this comment
by jimallen3d June 16, 2009 8:59 AM PDT
Personally, I am tired of being told, that I am the blame. When in all actuality it is our governments failure to deliver equitable mass transportations systems, failure to utlize our resources here at home wisely, have too long followed a progressive path. This is just more brainwashing, and controlling by self appointed monarchs.
Reply to this comment
by zyxxy June 16, 2009 9:55 AM PDT
Wouldn't government delivery of mass transit and utilization of local resources be a form of progressive government? Are you complaining about government being too progressive and not progressive enough in the same sentence?
by harchh June 16, 2009 11:02 AM PDT
No, "jmallen3d" is not doing what you ask if he's doing. You left out his important adjectives, "equitable" and "wisely" (perhaps not an adjective, but the point remains the same).

His complaint is obviously that government programs are concerned more about uplifting their supporters than providing good transportation infrastructures and making good use of resources. He's proposal is not for anarchy. His proposal is that government programs be implemented fairly and without the obvious intent of buying votes.
by mattie121 June 16, 2009 12:34 PM PDT
Wow, what a bunch of winers. This is a story about a company that is creating a tool for other companies to use to try to find ways to cut costs from their products via energy content analysis. This is a good thing. Maybe some companies will use it to good benefit. There is no requirement that this analysis method be adopted and used, but if one sees a way to use tools like this for economic advantage, there may be some win-wins! What's so wrong about that?

So who in their right mind cares? People who want to lower product manufacturing costs, people who want to look at indirect impacts when judging between to similarly priced alternatives, and those who want to take their head out of the sand and make a more informed decision.
Reply to this comment
by yacahuma June 16, 2009 12:41 PM PDT
I think it is pretty cool.
Reply to this comment
by sevort June 16, 2009 1:57 PM PDT
Trees need carbon dioxide to produce oxygen for us, so it's time to stop all this madness about carbon footprints...
Reply to this comment
by DoughboyNJ June 17, 2009 7:50 AM PDT
What is the carbon footprint of CNET? Or of this ridiculous article?

And who will check this company to see if its ratings are accurate?
The products of reputable blue chip companies will be blacklisted by a green company that could be making up their numbers out of thin air?

And what major company is going to reveal exactly how they make their products, if they are proprietary?

How does drivel like this get published?
Reply to this comment
by freemarket--2008 June 17, 2009 10:27 AM PDT
Any competent chemist can break a product down into it's basic components. It's not rocket science.
by mattie121 June 18, 2009 4:07 PM PDT
I guess cause the editors have the same attention to detail in reading that many of the commenters seem to have....

This is an enterprise software package that companies would buy (or licence or whatever) for internal use so they can make better decision. Your assumption that no companies would use the service because they wouldn't want the let out there secrets implies that no one would use Oracle or SAP because of the same fears.
(13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech reporter Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement