Version: 2008
  • On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!

Comments on: Video: Muscle cars meet green technology

The CBS Evening News reports on one mechanic's formula for mean, green power machines--with clients including Neil Young and Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by mrwater December 10, 2008 9:21 AM PST
This strikes me as one of the most absurd pretensions green-ness I've seen in a long time. The most basic step in green design is to question the need in the first place, and I don't see what need deserves to be met by a 7-ton toy for His Governator. I don't care what it burns; it's a colossal waste of energy.

Same with Neil Young's car. We all should know by now that electric cars are more energy-efficient, but the power to drive 5,000 pounds of 1959 car has to come from somewhere. This strikes me as a good reason to not spend money on music.
Reply to this comment
by ferretboy88 December 12, 2008 4:42 AM PST
some people have to work for a living. Maybe they need a truck to haul around the tools. Ever think of that? We can't all drive around in little smart two seat cars and hang out in star bucks all day.
by mrwater December 12, 2008 9:43 AM PST
ferretboy88, I'd like to point out that you've jumped to some pretty wild conclusions.

Are you really suggesting that "people who work for a living" need a 19-foot Lincoln that can go 160 mph?

And are you really suggesting that I'm not aware some people need bigger vehicles than a two-seater?

For the record, I work for a living. I'm lucky enough to be able to get by without even owning a car, but I drive one when needed. And I don't even drink coffee, let alone hang out at Starbucks.
by fokkwp December 10, 2008 10:54 AM PST
If you accelerate rapidly, or travel at high speed, you will not achieve any sort of reasonable fuel economy. Packing a barge load of lead-acid batteries in the back of a monster car just creates more pollution at the coal-fired generating plants. Nothing green but the paint.
Reply to this comment
by dbargen December 10, 2008 10:57 AM PST
Blah Blah waste of energy blah.

As long as the person pays for it, they can do whatever the hell they want with their energy. A strong economy is highlighted by profuse and affordable energy. That's one of the reasons America is a world financial power. See how the purportedly immune economies and India and China finally caught up with our economic issues.

And that brings us to the point of this article response. What's the point of highlighting seemingly successful "green" horsepower, in an effort to make such technologies palatable, if it costs so much? It's not going to replace oil, not when we have a century's worth or more on our own land waiting to be tapped.

As for arnold and neil, if they want to enjoy their toys, more power to them. I'd enjoy the thrill of the throttle myself in their shoes. Just try not to end up like this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smug_Alert!
Reply to this comment
by SpeedRacerGT December 10, 2008 12:02 PM PST
"Green" people all want to be dictators. This smart green technology should be applauded. We have people who are spending big dollars to compromise. Yet we still have the haters who refuse to see the positive here. What do you tell someone who has 6+ kids? What do they drive? How do they get around? People are so concerned about a the false notion that man is killing the planet by driving their cars, that they forget that people have lives. Let's focus on conservation, not just maximizing green to the detriment of happiness.
Reply to this comment
by mrwater December 10, 2008 3:33 PM PST
Let's see. What do I tell someone who has six kids? Please stop! Actually, I don't say that to people, because I love kids and I understand the desire to procreate. But I'd like people to be considerate of our ability to provide a livable life to all the earth's inhabitants.

If you have six kids, I'd suggest something other than one of these "green" muscle cars. If this is what your happiness depends on, I feel sorry for you.

There are conflicting rights at play here. As a Montanan, I have a (state) constitutional right to a "clean and healthy environment" and I think that belongs in our nation constitution.

My preference is that we can all better understand each other's needs and respond in a compassionate way. Yes, we have lives; I'd like to not have mine shortened by thoughtless and wasteful consumption.
by ferretboy88 December 12, 2008 4:43 AM PST
If every single liberal in America stopped using their battery powered toys and stopped driving any cars at all the world would be a better place.
Reply to this comment
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement