Comments on: Week in review: Apple goes into thin 'Air'
Ultrathin laptop debuts, along with other Apple products, as Microsoft gets patent-happy. Also: Detroit auto show goes green.
Ultrathin laptop debuts, along with other Apple products, as Microsoft gets patent-happy. Also: Detroit auto show goes green.
January 2, 2010 6:26 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:56 PM PST
January 2, 2010 4:16 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Sure, but the MacBook Air was not designed for "most folks". "Most folks" should buy a Macbook or Macbook Pro.
The MBA is a premium-price, special-use, prestige product to showcase design, technology and perhaps push present products toward the future. just like a "concept car"...expect people can actually buy one.
Don't plan on buying one myself, but it is unfair to criticize it for not being something that it was never intended to be.
Simple!
http://tinyurl.com/2fvnok
In the decade of being in the tech industry, going to hundreds of meetings, conferences, etc. I have seen exactly 2 people sporting ultra-lights. One of those was a deputy CIO who pecked on his IBM during a meeting (trying to look important) while his own presenter carried his Ultra-light mated to its deck, essentially turning it into a regular ThinkPad, plugged into our (still non-WiFi) network and ran our projector without a hitch.
The other time was an agent whom we met with every couple of years, who had one to show it off but the next year he had a regular notebook because he got tired lugging around all the separate bits. Most people have the lightest unit they can manage with them needing all the extra external toys.
Yes there places where ultralights have a purpose, but I fail to see when someone wants to be flexible enough to carry a PC instead of actual pen and stationery, but so in-flexible that carrying something akin to a oversized calculator/PDA makes sense, especially when ultra-lights cost more (not Less) than the standard before adding in all the necessary peripherals.
Add to that, the fact that other companies already manage to produce ultralights just thin, almost as light and still have all the ports, an optical drive, and user serviceable 6hour+ batteries.
I think this is simply in line with Apple's "why let them do it for free when you can charge them to do for it them?" strategy
The whole thing is just too "geek toy" for me. Who wants and ultra, with 1 usb, no optical, restricted possibilities for use, and at an $1,800.00 price???
Just doesn't make sense nor fit my laptop budget.
NOW, if they would have come out with a NEW iPhone, I would have been more impressed and it would have assisted my work and leisure time MUCH MORE! I would have purchased it "on the spot"!
I have a great laptop already, anyway!
Ron
However, I have never ever had to replace a Mac battery. I have an old wallstreet laptop from 1997 who's battery is fine. My orignial iBook from 2002 is fine. All my laptops are fine.
As far as the usefulness of the "air" I think it goes back to the original notebooks, a replacement for a paper notebook basically. These days most laptops have replaced desktops and do everything, but maybe someone just wants something for meetings and to lug on business trips, small thin and light.
But people will protest "but but but there's nothing!" and the Mac fanbois will scream them down - as usual.
between thin laptops as hardware without software is nothing. Take
bott time, OSX is 4 times faster. Take all other functionality needed
for computer user. If you take everything into account it is possible
that Apple has thinest solution that any other company. Very
elegant.
That is a matter of personal requirements. What is more than acceptable for one person isn't always suitable for someone else... just like pizza. Thick or thin crust? There is no one best solution.
Message to Apple:
You REALLY screwed the pooch, Steve! The loss in stock price
to date is going to be nothing compared to the end of the year
if you don't turn this one around! (I personally have already
lost thousands in share value).
When will you learn, Steve, that YOU are not the person driving
the innovation, it is the Apple customers. They wanted better
notebooks, you gave it to them, they bought them. They
wanted video on the iPod, you gave it to them (grudgingly I will
add) and they bought it. They wanted a smartphone, you
fought it for years, gave in and gave them a crappy product
(Rocr), then finally gave them what they wanted, they bought it.
You have put out nothing spectacular here. People are
clamoring for a touchpad portable, a DVR, a PDA, game
machines, UPGRADE-ABLE and REPAIRABLE products. GIVE IT
TO THEM!
I beg you as a shareholder and customer, give the people what
they want! Or do you just not hear them? Or do you just think
you are smarter than them and think you have to tell them
what they want?
I am almost done with you and Apple. I am not sure where to
turn at this point, because MS doesn't seem to get it either!
Linux is sounding better and better...I will just build my own
machines if you don't get off your high horse and make the
equipment I know you can.
companies.
You think you are driving the innovation.. great.. nice way to
take credit for someone else's work. What have you achieved in
real life??
If you think the stock price has something to do with the price
drops in AAPL share, think again..
Why don't you sell the stock and make the money that you can
as the stock price is going to drop further because Apple is not
going to withdraw this product from the market.
Don't let too much of your ignorance get exposed.
would, it is STEVE JOBS that saved Apples stock when it was... oh... let's see...
between $14 to $16 a share...
Consumers wanting innovation don't create products... if it DID, we would
have had great cell phones from companies like Motorola and Nokia (which we
don't), and great software from companies like Microsoft (which I don't think
EVER will happen). And when I say great I mean cell phones that do what WE
want... not with crippled features and with a lousy interface so we can be
gouged for more money later...
Without a Steve Jobs in the mix (someone who can realistically visualize how
to create products that truely fit consumers needs) you get nothing. People
didn't clammor for an iPod and Apple made it, BTW. Apple made it and
stunned people. That's why they bought it. People didn't say "Make us a fast,
easy to use operating system and built it over the security and robustness of
UNIX" so Apple did... I was in the audience for the keynote that announced the
original OS X... total surprise by even THOSE geeky people.
So it's Steve Jobs whose understanding of what people want that's taken their
stock from $14/$16 to the $160ish that it is today... splitting at least once
along the way. Thank you Steve.
BTW... the MB Air is not a product that I would buy. but that doesn't mean it
doesn't fill a need for a different group of people.
- People are quick to judge a product that isn't available
- by Vegaman_Dan January 21, 2008 12:57 PM PST
- Until it is out in the hands of end users, I think we are a bit quick to judge what the real demand would be.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(24 Comments)Apple thought the iPhone would sell 10 million units by this time and it would be a hit in Europe. They missed on both marks.
I thought the iPhone would be too limited of a device and the service contract locked to AT&T would make it a product without a market. I missed on that one. People still bought it.
The AppleTV was stillborn from the outset. Hopefully the new version will help revive the flagging product.
It's a hard market to guess. Sure there have been ultrathin laptops before, thinner and ligher than the Air. Even now, there are several laptops out that have all the features the Air is lacking, plus being lighter (See the Toshiba Portege R500 for example), but none of those have the infamous Apple logo. There is something to be said for people who buy by brand name only.
I don't know how well this will do. It definitely have a market, but I'm not sure that it will be big enough for Apple to keep producing it. If they can't make their money back on the design and production work on it due to slow/poor sales, then it might get pulled purely for financial reasons. It might also do very well and they will release new models.
People might also want to wait two months before buying it to see if there will be a price drop or new improvements to the base model. People are a bit more wary after the iPhone debacle.
Of all the comments I have read here defending the Air, the general concensus is that it's a great product, it has a market, but no, they won't be buying one. I haven't seen any posts from someone who intends to buy one yet. That has me worried about its future.