Version: 2008

Comments on: Windows 7 beta now available

After a day-long delay, Microsoft makes the Windows 7 beta broadly available. The company has said it's looking for millions of testers for the Vista successor.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 3 of 6 pages (156 Comments)
by ChristosWinter January 10, 2009 11:08 PM PST
Cool
Reply to this comment
by sebastien.kalonji January 10, 2009 11:15 PM PST
Dear, Greg465 Don't really know, I don't play games on my mac but If I can run window 7 on my Mac i guess the the experience is the same as on every PC with high specs. But I use a console to play games otherwise I have to wait ages before the games that are released for my PS3 become available for PC. The games argument does not fly anymore for PC's, oh heck it was the last argument you could hold on to :-)
Reply to this comment
by 3Djesus January 11, 2009 12:30 AM PST
'The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use' - that being said, I installed on my Dual core Atom 330 mobo and really like what I am seein. was no need to install any of the four drivers intel supplies with the mobo(D945GCLF2). I've only ever used xp/ubuntu except for a couple hours of vista on my broinlaw's "underpowered HP???, I paid $1800 for this, the guy said it would work good with vista" desktop. the win7beta seems to be at least as good as xp if not better, I'm fixen to check the juice this thing is suckin between the 2 OS's next. Anyway, I got here cuz I was lookin for some other experience's with the new os not the next episode of the hills, good luck y'all, and by the way , did anyone try IE tab in firefox?

hope this is useful to someone
Reply to this comment
by Sunardy January 11, 2009 1:09 AM PST
I've got it all, .iso and serial for 64bit and 32bit. i already install 64bit in my computer.
Windows Media Center and Visual Studio Express run smoothly.....
Right now, i'm starting to fill my windows 7 with all my 'Heavy Weight' software and games. So far so good, NICE...... i'm so excited and eager to upgrade my Ram to 16Gb, just to fill my curiosity.. haha
spec:
- Core 2 Quad 6600
- Ram 8 Gb
- Vga GeForce 9600GT 512
Reply to this comment
by D3vildog699 January 11, 2009 5:54 AM PST
is that an Evga GeForce 9600GT? Not dissing just wondering... I have the the same one if it is :) awesome card!
by PCQIK January 11, 2009 6:26 AM PST
Finally !!!!!.. A fast ..No Bloatware Version of Microsoft... Loads in less than 20 minutes...boots in less than 20 seconds....easy navigation for the most challenged users. Looking forward to beta testing and future updates. WAY TO GO MICROSOFT!! My customer's have longed for this..is it really true?
I have my fingers crossed. www.pcqik.com
Reply to this comment
by SkateNY January 11, 2009 7:03 AM PST
This race was over a long time ago. Those of you who lost your life savings in MSFT, well, keep on dreaming:

Anyone who follows the Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) market knows that every major SaaS player, starting with Salesforce.com (CRM), uses the success of consumer-oriented, on-line services as the model for its business-to-business solutions.

SaaS vendors, executives and ?experts? (myself included) point to the way these web-based services created an enjoyable, effective and economical user experience as the centerpiece of their success.

The most prominent example of this approach has been Apple iTunes.

Ironically, Apple (AAPL) has never taken advantage of its prominence and positioned itself as a SaaS or cloud-computing player. It appears that this may be changing. At this past week?s MacWorld, Apple unveiled a new, web-based version of its iWork productivity suite. Just as Microsoft?s (MSFT) Software-Plus-Services strategy is an acknowledgement of the growing interest and adoption of web-based apps, so is Apple?s move down the same path.

Apple is also moving in this direction to build on the momentum it has gained penetrating the corporate environment. At the desktop and laptop levels, Apple capitalized on customer discontentment with Microsoft?s move to Vista to win a greater share of the corporate PC market. The iPhone has also been a big hit among corporate customers.

So, Apple is in a far better position to succeed in its SaaS/cloud-computing initiative than Microsoft. Apple has the online procurement and delivery mechanisms to facilitate the new service, as well as the end-user devices (desktops, MacBooks and iPhones). It is known for its innovations, and will immediately attract a broad base of curious and committed fans to test the beta version of the new on-demand service.

Apple can also exploit the growing ?consumerism? within the corporate IT environment, which has seen end-users bring their personal systems and services into the workplace to get their jobs done. Apple can also leverage a vast assortment of developers, channel partners and strategic relationships to distribute and enhance its SaaS solutions. So, the ?poster child? for the SaaS movement appears to be making its move to claim a share of the rapidly growing SaaS/cloud-computing market.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/114203-is-apple-getting-saasy
Reply to this comment
by shellcodes_coder January 11, 2009 7:21 AM PST
Windows 7 is far more better than crap OS X. Can't wait for it's final version.
Reply to this comment
by Zacm05 January 11, 2009 8:08 PM PST
no, wrong.
by rranger1 January 11, 2009 7:21 AM PST
After some initial glitches associated with my Grub bootloader, I was able to install Windows 7 in a separate partition on a SEVEN YEAR OLD Dell PC.

Windows 7 runs much faster than the beta of Vista I had on the machine a couple of years ago (I had to get rid of it because it was interminably slow). And, the OS installed with very few hitches. It could identify my Netgear Ethernet card, but since I had a wireless dongle, I was able to use that to access the web.

Otherwise, it has been genuinely impressive. From first impressions, it actually looks like MS got it right for a change. Unlike some other posters, I actually like the new taskbar better than Vista's. I'm used to KDE, and it seems as though they're trying to emulate that Linux model.
Reply to this comment
by davekcxl January 11, 2009 8:17 AM PST
I was able to download it, and burn it just fine. Only problem is it won't allow a UPGRADE install from windows XP, you have to wipe your drive to install it. It will allow a upgrade from windows vista but i have no desire to re-install that, just to install windows 7
Reply to this comment
by rollo1002 January 12, 2009 11:16 AM PST
So what's so difficult about formatting the hard drive or creating a partition to install it on? Little bit of advice it might not be wise to replace your XP install with a beta OS. Just a thought.
by globalist_agenda January 11, 2009 9:40 AM PST
Decent, but basically Vista II. Nothing very new in this release. A few bugs cause lockups.
Reply to this comment
by pixael January 11, 2009 9:46 AM PST
"Microsoft has apparently decided that it has enough server capacity and has made the code available for the Windows 7 beta. "

I think you mean they made a compiled version available. If MS actually released the source code for any version of windows I would eat my own... well I wont say what exactly I would eat because it go's against the terms of service.
Reply to this comment
by dennisl59 January 11, 2009 10:26 AM PST
My experience?. E6600, 4GB, nVidia 8800GT; Downloaded 64bit version quickly(TWC Turbo),Burned the DVD(ImgBurn), Installed on a Clean WD 80GB Sata Drive, all in less than an hour. Rebooted, etc. Did the usual information entry for a new installation, etc. Set up my display preferences, etc. My opinion?. It's just not called Vista and with more "eye candy". Then uninstalled the Drive, went back to Vista Home Premium 64Bit-SP1 which is running clean and error free with no hangs or issues.

Ping me when Microsoft has something revolutionary.

Thank You.
Reply to this comment
by didibanner January 11, 2009 10:26 AM PST
I think Windows 7 is a quite good.
The install process was painless, IE8 is a step up from IE7, the interface is quite beautiful.
However, I don't think that it is not revolutionary.
In my opinion, it should simply have been Vista SP2.
Reply to this comment
by didibanner January 11, 2009 10:28 AM PST
Ha ha.
I meant to write that I don't think that it is revolutionary in the third line
by charleswhennessy January 11, 2009 10:30 AM PST
How about the fact that the system goes away on August 1 and it wipes out your 'D' partition recovery backup. This is approaching 'HIGHWAY ROBBERY.'
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 January 11, 2009 3:54 PM PST
Then demand a refund on what you paid!
by old3eyes January 11, 2009 11:32 AM PST
Anyone who does a upgrade install over their prime OS asks for all they get..
Reply to this comment
by dennisl59 January 11, 2009 12:06 PM PST
old3eyes...I completely, utterly and totally agree...and ANYONE who would load a BETA of ANY operating system over a working copy is a MORON, IDIOT and FOOL and should have their PC's confiscated for life after all the publicity and warnings.

But there will be some people who will.

I'm waiting to hear all the complaining, moaning, groaning, ********, cussing, "I told you so's" , and I hate Microsoft, I love XP, etc., on the discussion page. It should make for some hilarious reading and Schadenfreude.

Thank You.
by tigersref January 11, 2009 12:16 PM PST
I have been able to download and install window 7 on a Macbook Pro using bootcamp. So far, so good and all is working. As a matter of fact, I'm writting this comment using Internet Explorer 8 beta.

wish us luck
Reply to this comment
by odaynasser January 11, 2009 2:00 PM PST
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Microsoft-Windows-7/39012423321?sid=7ba85d510748c78fc91287ae28bdd38d&ref=s
Reply to this comment
by oludir January 11, 2009 2:46 PM PST
Any one installed it with virtual pc yet?
Reply to this comment
by fredjf January 11, 2009 2:56 PM PST
yep. install fine on virtual pc.
by rdwalton January 12, 2009 8:31 AM PST
Installed it on my macbook pro. Not an issue, everything is running fine!
by eddieknoll January 11, 2009 4:17 PM PST
The download sucks... Like everything MS. It won't install as a seperate partition, and I'll be damned if I'll do the Upgrade Optioon. Steve Ballmer should suck a .45...
Reply to this comment
by rranger1 January 12, 2009 5:29 AM PST
Funny; I just installed it as a separate partition yesterday. Hmmm... You really should have a clue of what you're talking about before you spew.
by chatins January 11, 2009 6:30 PM PST
I've jumped through this hoop with slightly more ease than I expected. Seven installed cleaner and smarter than Vista.

The taskbar works more like the dock in OSX. I was having fun with this - until I moved it (the task-dock) to the right side of the screen. When I clicked on games menu the system shuddered to a halt.

But in a flash, the system recovered itself without disrupting a driver download I was shoehorning. 7 didn't get my sound driver, a Realtek AC97.

Microsoft has greatly improved the kernel optimization for older machines. Keeping track of things is downright Net-centric.

I'm happy the "widgets bar" is gone on the right side, but this baby still needs more spit and shine to even touch OSX or Ubuntu Linux.
Reply to this comment
Showing 3 of 6 pages (156 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Microsoft

Stay up-to-date on news centered in Redmond, Wash., from acquisitions to product updates to leadership developments.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Microsoft topics

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement