Comments on: Windows 7 beta 1 makes early debut
Apparently leaked copies of Microsoft's forthcoming operating system pop up on torrent trackers.
Apparently leaked copies of Microsoft's forthcoming operating system pop up on torrent trackers.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Stay up-to-date on news centered in Redmond, Wash., from acquisitions to product updates to leadership developments.
Add this feed to your online news reader
I'm using Windows 7 right now to type this, and it's extremely faster when booting up. Very stable, hasn't crashed yet, and it's only a beta! I used Vista before this, and Vista's great too, but Windows 7 just improves even more. The new superbar is very helpful. I can't even imagine how stable the final OS will be!
"I'm a PC"
7 was found to be three times faster than XP in almost every test ! And this is in Beta still. I`m in.
I will get Windows 7 but I get tired of the people who say Vista sucks and try to run it on a low end machine. It will run slow and that is the truth, I am a gamer so I know all about hardware and I try to keep up with everything that comes out.
Most users are not like that though, they have 2-4 year old machines and are not sufficient enough to run Vista. Is that a problem? Maybe. I don't complain since I have never had a problem with drivers or the OS in general. Good thing I am a patient person as well since windows UAC can be a little annoying but you get use to it. That or you can just scale it back a bit with a few clicks.
Windows 7 has to be great for Microsoft, if that does not get them back on their feet then I might go over to a a Mac. However I do love upgrading my computer with a passion and it is a bit harder to do that on a Mac.
dx 10 is kicking with games that run with this O.S.......... Anyway that's what i think about the new windows seven
Thankyou Thankyou ....... I'll use this O.s until it all goes Pete Tong ............................. Thankyou Thankyou
Happy New Year from richard in hastings east sussex uk
Can't live without a Mac? I, for one, can LIVE without a Windows but can't do anything else without it! Okay, I own an iPod. ONLY BECAUSE I COULDN'T GET A ZUNE! I DON'T CARE IF iPods ARE BETTER THAN ZUNES! Macs ARE CERTAINLY NOT! One guy up there was correct when he told you guys to design a resume' without MS Office! I agree with those guys who love the Hole in the wall better than a rotten apple! Thank You!
- by videoeditor7117 January 5, 2009 7:38 PM PST
- First of all, I own a video production studio in Springfield, MO, and I have always used Windows OS with my company. Now, normally I not comment on posts like this simply because I dont have a lot of time, however, i felt it nessesary to hurry and create an account so that I could inform many consumers and a hand full of professionals about the enormous misconception concerning Windows (including XP and Vista) vs MAC.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 4 of 4 pages (179 Comments)I have used Both OS's and find that either one is extremely effective with a wide range of purposes. However the biggest misconception that MAC is "better" than PC (Windows) is completely incorrect. And here is why.
In the late 80's early 90's your options for a computer whether it be for home or business was MAC or PC, kind of like today. But the biggest difference was that neither one of them had the capabilities to do what most of consumers and professionals needed to do accomplish using a computer. For consumers, a user friendly, fully cabable word processing machine, that could also connect to the internet was all that was needed. So Microsoft adopted the "PC" (personal computer) title and marketed towards people who were in need of.....a personal computer! Doing this they were able to use a wide variety of hardware and software to quickly meet the demands of an extremely demanding market. However, reliability and stability were sacrificed because the average consumer didnt need a rock solid machine, they needed somthing that would work. On the other hand MAC did just the opposite, they did not integrate their hardware and software, they spent all their time and money on their own specific product, making a machine that could do high processing, create visual effects (film and video) and graphic design. Creating a much more stable and expensive system that many professionals could use effectively.
Now today you have a company whose offers one product, one solution and is completely known for stability and performance, and another product who is completely integrated and quickly produced with the avergae consumer in mind.
However! BOTH systems, through modern day markets and technology, can provide the same quality and performance to get the job done effectively!
I use Windows Vista and I have no problems with it that I dont have with my MAC. Over the past 7 years I have used most likely 15 to 20 machines, in many different environments, both MAC and Windows, and I know from experience neither one is better than the other.
I would encourage you to experience both systems thouroughly before you start making comments about them based on their stereotypes established 20 years ago.
Take it for what its worth but I think I might switch to Linux...they have some great stuff coming out!