Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: NARUTO SHIPPUDEN Episode 140: Fate

Comments on: Google envy is alive and well in Redmond

Thought he had grown out of it? No way. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer's new mantra: "My gestalt is stronger than your gestalt."

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (37 Comments)
by hawkeyeaz1 June 20, 2008 4:34 PM PDT
Yeah, Google only has "one" product in 5 years, but Microsoft only has 2 in 20. DOS doesn't count as it was bought, not made and Windows just absorbed it.
Reply to this comment
by theantibush June 20, 2008 5:02 PM PDT
An amazingly incompetent statement.
by GallowGlass June 20, 2008 5:04 PM PDT
That's not entirely true. Microsoft has had plenty of products and games. The difference is, Google isn't constantly trying to be something it's not... like microsoft is.
by Penguinisto June 20, 2008 7:04 PM PDT
well, they did make Microsoft Bob. And a whole parade of products that have either consistently failed, fell into last place, or required a shedload of cheap tricks (e.g. channel-stuffing) just to keep relevant.
by MSSlayer June 21, 2008 11:15 AM PDT
Microsoft games? Wrong, they bought great gaming houses and left them alone. One of the few smart things MS did. But you can't claim that those games are truly from MS, because they are not.
by supoman June 20, 2008 4:37 PM PDT
There is envy in Redmond anytime there is a company that does what they can't seem to do.....INNOVATE. Stop playing evil ogre under the bridge and start innovating!!!!
Reply to this comment
by theantibush June 20, 2008 5:00 PM PDT
Thats right, they are a one-pony show.
All you need is a pony gun.
And wouldn't you know it, balmie just happens to own one heck of a gun shop.

Im sure they will abstract from search and derive its meaning and value to the customer, the axioms that support the fundamental calculus of consumer value provided by search..and then take that little yet infinitely vital leap forward.

Yahoo, target practice..especially as they disintegrate internally.
I'd pick 'em up later at the fire sale, for icing on the cake..not the cake itself.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto June 20, 2008 7:05 PM PDT
If MSFT uses half of the buzzword-soup that you just spewed, the customers will likely just tune them out.
by Shuelin June 20, 2008 5:01 PM PDT
Google is about innovation and originality, Microsoft is not. It amazes me that this company, Microsoft, has so much money but continues to put out crap like Vista and Office 2007.
Reply to this comment
by ballmerisanape June 20, 2008 6:15 PM PDT
Ballmer is so out of touch it isn't funny. If the shareholders let him stay in charge.. it will be the end of Microsoft.
Reply to this comment
by xuanquydm June 20, 2008 6:29 PM PDT
google has one product but they don't stop.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto June 20, 2008 7:02 PM PDT
Err, someone ought to tell Elop that it's not due to arrogance or hubris, but actual no-**** history that marks Microsoft as a theiver of others' innovations. ;)
Reply to this comment
by dune36 June 20, 2008 7:52 PM PDT
You people are all vicitms of mindless groupthink. Microsoft is the most innovative company on the planet. They've done far more than anyone else to make the power of computers available to people. Google's pretty cool, too, except... "Don't Be Evil...?" - try reading the EULA when you sign up for gmail...
Reply to this comment
by frantaylor June 20, 2008 9:56 PM PDT
The market doesn't seem to agree with you. Check out Microsoft's stock price. Unchanged for the last 8 years.
by igl00lgi June 20, 2008 9:57 PM PDT
Try reading the EULA when before you buy a laptop. Ohh, you CAN'T.
by KonradK June 21, 2008 12:49 AM PDT
A long list of Microsoft "innovations":
http://www.mcmillan.cx/innovation.html
by KonradK June 21, 2008 1:22 AM PDT
This link shows that Microsoft is not an innovator, in spite of their claims to the contrary:

http://www.dwheeler.com/innovation/microsoft.html
by cnetcensorssuck June 21, 2008 1:38 PM PDT
...and you're a victim of mindlessness in general.
by ballmerisanape June 20, 2008 8:16 PM PDT
dune36... you do realize that microsoft didn't even "optimize" the retail version of windows for internet use until xp service pack 2.. don't you? Is that innovation? Who's drinking the punch?
Reply to this comment
by gpstein June 20, 2008 9:05 PM PDT
Though I don't follow Microsoft closely (I'm a Mac guy), I do know that they have only a few solid products.

1) Vista is a mess

2) XP is sluggish & moody

3) Office (both PC & Mac) is blotted and needs to be tweaked

4) IE is below average when compared to Firefox

5) Zune was DOA, not even a contender.

Really, what does Microsoft do thats great ?
Reply to this comment
by igl00lgi June 20, 2008 9:56 PM PDT
Not much since 1995. I own the stock I should know. Ballmer has to go.
by jbirge June 21, 2008 8:44 AM PDT
> Really, what does Microsoft do thats great?

I'm no fan of MS, and especially Monkey Boy Balmer, but I do have the answer to your question: developer tools. Visual Studio and .NET are actually quite brilliant. MS has always known that the most important feature of an OS is the software written for it. You have to give them credit for that.
by manlion1975 June 20, 2008 9:17 PM PDT
being a seattle-ite, i hate most people working at microsoft and think steve ballmer is a chump. but the fact of the matter is, microsoft makes a lot more money than anybody else. they grow more per year than google makes per year. say what you want, but i think most other companies envy that. and most businesses have come to rely on them so much that they will always have customers. it is true that google only has one product that makes money. microsoft has scores. as for innovation, enabling third party developers to write powerful apps without having to learn assembly was pretty smart. they were writing basic compilers before most people knew what a computer was. it may not be as sexy as little smiley face icons on a screen or a cool word like google, but microsoft came up with a real business model and won, and made companies like google possible. stop ******** and go figure out how to steal their market share from OS, Office, Visual Studio, SQL Server, Win Server, XBox,... that's what will humble them.
Reply to this comment
by frantaylor June 20, 2008 9:58 PM PDT
"they grow more per year than google"

Boy are you deluded. Microsoft's stock price peaked in 2000 and hasn't been the same since.
by igl00lgi June 20, 2008 9:55 PM PDT
Isn't it so telling, if Yahoo can be called a loser in the search space, what does that make MS? What does that tell us about the leaders of a company, with a monopoly on the desktop, who are unable to parlay that monopoly into a success online. I think it tells us that Ballmer needs to go as much as yang does. Maybe they can hang out in the bar together talking about what could have been. I would like to be the fly.
Reply to this comment
by developIT June 20, 2008 9:59 PM PDT
What do you expect from the anti-MS zealots? It's always a damn if you do damn if you don't situation for Microsoft. They will never acknowledge the fact that Microsoft has the biggest contribution to the world of personal and business computing. In case you're one of those that kisses the ground where Google walks on, here's one thought. Google is now the monopoly of the search business. And you don't seem to care. But you're also the ones that regularly bring out Microsoft's monopoly in the OS and Office business. Now why the double standard here? And to the author of this column, I don't think its envy. Balmer has no reason to be envious of something that is only a small portion of his company's business. If case you have forgotten, it's Windows and Office that is their major cash cow. So unless search has already become the biggest money source in the planet, and the OS, Office, game console, electronic gadgets, etc. have become irrelevant , I don't see your point.
Reply to this comment
by lohhonch June 20, 2008 10:00 PM PDT
Sometimes when you get too successful and rich, you will be sued.

hongjun
http://hongjun.blogspot.com/
Reply to this comment
by walkair June 20, 2008 10:27 PM PDT
Wow - it's amazing to see so many Microsoft hatters from Goople club.

hawkeyeaz1 - are you out of you mind? 2 products in 20 years?!
Wake man, just wake up and do some research prior to posting. If you personally know just two products (btw, how many MS products you're using without knowing?) that doesn't mean anything. Just to name the "few" - Windows Mobile, Windows Server, SQL Server, Windows XP, XBOX, Exchange Server, Hotmail, Visual Studio, PC Games , etc...
Most of you guys mixing up Google consumer freebies with Microsoft fee-based business model for both businesses and consumers. Don't get me wrong I like Google too (their web tools in particular), but I also aware of lack of support when you're expecting help from Google itself. Another problem that I'm seeing in this post is that you're comparing web browser oriented tools (Gmail, Google Maps) with OS/hardware oriented products (Office, Windows). It's totally different ball-game. When your OS runs on thousands of hardware components manufactured by thousands of companies somethings may go wrong. Just imagine Microsoft is manufacturing it's own laptop like Apple does and suddenly all of your XP/Vista problems are gone forever.

Next time that you're going to buy a laptop from dell.com or LCD TV from costco.com be aware that you're (at least) using Microsoft Windows Server with Microsoft ASP.NET technology.

"Microsoft may not innovative, but it is very very competitive and ambitious."
Reply to this comment
by Ar1as June 20, 2008 10:48 PM PDT
most of you, supposably computer/tech savvy individuals, state that Google has only ONE product (Google.com) when in reality they have more than 10! Some examples are: Gmail, Picasa, Google Earth, Google Maps, Adsense, etc. Microsoft also offers more than 10 products and one of its most succesful is its video game line: Xbox, Xbox 360, Xbox Live, Xbox Marketplace, Ensemble Studios, Microsoft Studios, etc.

Stop the blind hate and the blind love people.If you seek to make a difference then stop purchasing Microsoft producst, DO not CRY.

-ar1as
Reply to this comment
by DrtyDogg June 22, 2008 10:48 AM PDT
the one product that is being refferd to is search, they make all of there money from adsense. picasa, google maps etc all utilize adsense for profit.
by Sumatra-Bosch June 21, 2008 4:06 AM PDT
The Boy Fuhrer from Duncan Hines is hilarious.

Having him call Google a one-trick pony is like having Jeffrey Dahmer accuse someone of bad table manners.

MSFT is the epitome of one-trick ponies. They have one trick: boot loader lock-in via contracts with the manufacturers.

Without it, consumers could buy computers with 20 operating systems on it and, like any software, buy and use one or more however they see fit.

If Justice ever opened up the boot loader, Microsoft would vanish in 5 years. Ballmer knows it. It's all they have besides the file format scam. That's why he is running scared, that and the fact that the company can't actually make anything that anyone would want. Which is why MSFT wins by making sure the market space is queered through some legal mechanism, like the boot loader aspect of MSFT's contracts with the manufacturers.

Duncan Hines!
Reply to this comment
by jeffmalec June 22, 2008 11:01 PM PDT
Go ahead. Try using 20 different OS's. Let's see...which one to play Sims 2? Which one to log in to my work machine? Which one to run that photo editing software again?

We tried that multi-OS crap before. Remember the 80's? Commodore, TI, Timex, TRS, Apple, Coleco, and oh IBM. That was a blast. Ask Bank Street Writer how much fun it was to put out 6 flavors of one word processor...oh, that's right you. You can't. The wait of supporting multi-OS crushed them.

Google, Google, Google. It was only 24 months ago it was Red Hat, Red Hat. Turn into the mirror and look at yourself. I'm tired of the whining fanboys. Move on. Innovate yourself.
by alenas June 21, 2008 6:25 AM PDT
Come on everybody, lets praise GOOGLE, cause GOOGLE has monopoly on SPAM'ing the internet. Such a great company - such a great business model - such a profitable SPAM business.
I do not understand - how come everyone hates SPAM emails, but on the other hand tolerates Google SPAM placed on every website. And why are businesses paying money for SPAM?
Google has only one product that makes money - just they forgot to make sure this product brings value to businesses.
Reply to this comment
by ppgreat June 21, 2008 6:40 AM PDT
"Google is about innovation and originality, Microsoft is not. It amazes me that this company, Microsoft, has so much money but continues to put out crap like Vista and Office 2007."

No, the amazing thing is that people keep buying the crap and tolerating it. Microsoft works off their own spreadsheets. If the numbers start going south, they will do something about it. The market is going to have to vote with their business and consumer dollars elsewhere, and put the screws to the OEMs who only peddle MS wares.
Reply to this comment
by t8 June 21, 2008 5:15 PM PDT
Microsoft as made heaps of money off other peoples ideas, illegal and legal. That is what Microsoft does well. Google and Apple are the real innovators and history will remember it this way too.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (37 Comments)
advertisement

Google's mobile hopes go beyond Nexus One

The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
• Photos: Unboxing Nexus One

Using your smartphone safely

faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.

About Coop's Corner

Charles Cooper has covered technology and business for more than 25 years. A graduate of Queens College and Columbia University, Cooper received the Excellence in Journalism award from the Northern California branch of the Society for Professional Journalists for column writing.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Coop's Corner topics

advertisement
advertisement