Version: 2008

Comments on: My good deed done for Mike Arrington

E-mail overload is a fact of life but there are already existing solutions. What's missing is real commitment from the likes of Microsoft and IBM, et al.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by lymond01 March 23, 2008 8:54 PM PDT
The right tool for the right purpose. With email, instant messaging, and the phone (as well as less immediate document exchange sites), the bases are covered, it's just a matter of priority. E-mail should not be used for quick questions to a single person, things that need a fast response, or issues that are recursive ("I need to order this." "Ok, let me check with Sue on the account number." "Sue, which account number?" "55566555." "Thanks. Please use this account number."...seriously, pick up the bloody phone.)

If you haven't implemented chat in your department, you probably should. It's like a less-intrusive phone call. You need a response, but don't need to disturb someone with a telephone call (hands leave the keyboard, meeting is interrupted, etc). Instant messaging is great for quick contact and it can be answered almost no matter what if the person is sitting at the desk.

Phone is for important matters where it's easier to get your point across.
Reply to this comment
by rcrusoe March 24, 2008 5:53 AM PDT
I agree, people use email inappropriately much of the time. If you want me in a hurry, call me or IM. I only open my email once every two hours during the work day. And never after hours.
by BarneyHK March 24, 2008 1:52 AM PDT
The answer is Orla. www.orla.org. There are four things required to solve the problem of email overload: (1) a new interface for Outlook making it easy to organise all the work that results from the email you send and receive (2) purposeful training to allow that new interface to deliver value (3) measurement of the improvement in performance to provide out the intellectual and financial investment and (4) anticipation of the behavioural change required for its all about getting people to move their cheese! Read our White Paper and watch our one minute movie to understand why the problem persists and why technology by itself will never solve it.
Reply to this comment
by Dana Gardner March 24, 2008 5:22 AM PDT
The answer is called manual labor. Wetware beats hardware at this delicate triage level. When you grow too big to handle the a job (a good problem), you hire. Arrington, or anyone else this swamped, needs to place a warm body between themselves and the river of communications. In other words, he needs an assistant. And he can afford one.
Reply to this comment
by boriquajake March 24, 2008 9:22 AM PDT
emails that you don't want to open and read are called "spam". If that many people are sending you crap you don't read, why are you not declaring it "spam" and having your email client block them from ever hitting your inbox again? I don't get it, if you don't read it now any important little nuggets are getting lost anyway.
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Coop's Corner

Charles Cooper has covered technology and business for more than 25 years. A graduate of Queens College and Columbia University, Cooper received the Excellence in Journalism award from the Northern California branch of the Society for Professional Journalists for column writing.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Coop's Corner topics

advertisement
advertisement