Comments on: Bored silly by Facebook's valuation. Twitter's, too
Maybe bloggers and reporters have too much time on their hands, but the valuation speculation-fest is an obsession that doesn't merit the attention it continues to command.
Maybe bloggers and reporters have too much time on their hands, but the valuation speculation-fest is an obsession that doesn't merit the attention it continues to command.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Charles Cooper has covered technology and business for more than 25 years. A graduate of Queens College and Columbia University, Cooper received the Excellence in Journalism award from the Northern California branch of the Society for Professional Journalists for column writing.
Add this feed to your online news reader
...
Nah, you guys are right. I'm tired of hearing about this stuff. Twitter is a demigod, we get it by now.
I was forced to comment yesterday on an article I read called "Social networks in freefall" or somesuch which suggested that Facebook has gone down from a value of $15Bn to $3.7Bn, and Twitter in the space of weeks went from the $500M Facebook stock offer to the $250M recent funding round. No mention at all of 900% user growth rates, but then I guess that doesn't fit with the headline.
Whenever anyone asks what such companies are worth, I point them to the most reliable data, that from the public stock listing of XING in Germany. This is a social network valued on the same basis as any other public company -- by the market itself. 7 million users, 35M Euros revenue, EBITDA of nearly 13M Euros and a valuation of 156M Euros (today). That is a healthy company in these times, but yet still sensibly valued.
Ian Hendry
CEO, WeCanDo.BIZ
http://www.wecando.biz
- by tommyboy1313 February 20, 2009 12:33 PM PST
- Spot on.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(5 Comments)So much self-adulating silicon valley hype about one company that is the new friendster, no, myspace and another that enables online status updates which is now a feature of facebook and every other social network anyway. Friendster was usurped by MySpace which was replaced by Facebook and Facebook will be replaced by so and so. Someone *still* might buy twitter just to say they did a deal, but they still don't have a business plan 3 years later.
Social networks are fad-driven. Facebook has built the most sophisticated platform, but user switching costs still aren't high enough for them to not be replaced by the next cool-kids thing.
Valuation? Pffffffffffffft. As if private valuation is a highly correlated predictor of exit value. If it were, all of us start-up folk would be swimming in cash!