Version: 2008
  • On CHOW: Can girls use the guys' bathroom?

Comments on: Spying as a business model. Will these guys get a clue already?

What all this demonstrates for the umpteenth time is that the RIAA and MPAA still show themselves to be in possession of quite the tin ear.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Stephen Macklin August 18, 2008 6:40 PM PDT
I would like to ask each of these people how they feel about the government's enhanced surveillance powers under the Patriot Act. Mostly because I loved the dazed and confused look of cognitive dissonance.
Reply to this comment
by gerrrg August 18, 2008 7:04 PM PDT
I don't mean to talk process, but there are many details missing in your blog, for any of us to understand why the presentation displayed a 'perverse reading of the U.S. Constitution'.

I feel like I'm being preached to, instead of presented facts and having them tied together. Which part of the Constitution are you speaking about?
Reply to this comment
by The_Decider August 18, 2008 7:46 PM PDT
Go look it up in a news piece, not an editorial.
by The_Decider August 18, 2008 7:46 PM PDT
Google's entire business model involves spying to certain extents.

It is not the job of the government or ISP's to help another industry make money.
Reply to this comment
by charlie cooper August 18, 2008 10:07 PM PDT
i hotlnked so you could go directly to the piece i'm referring to. here's the link again:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10019622-38.html?tag=mncol;txt
Reply to this comment
by Pete Bardo August 19, 2008 9:38 AM PDT
Coop, Still nothing about the Constitution there! The Constitution only prohibits the government from unreasonable search. Now, if reports from the spy activities go directly to a government agency, it might be a Constitutional issue.

Typical of the day, when laws can't be enforced by the appropriate agencies, citizens are asked to spy on each other. This is not in our best interests as a free nation.
Reply to this comment
by MaxAgent86 August 19, 2008 12:48 PM PDT
But let's suspend that skepticism and momentarily assume that some ISPs would play along. Would you trust your friendly broadband provider not to monitor other prohibited items beyond pirated songs and movies?

One answer to it is that if you start with music & movies there are no really good reason NOT to do it for other items, heck it is for law enforcement.

And why stop with the Internet, why not monitor all telephone conversation, open snail mail etc, some people are also using these services for illegal activities.

The police would not be able to get a warrant unless they have a good reason, (except maybe the FBI if they suspect you of being a terrorist). In other words they cannot go fishing for some possible illegal activities

What the Movie & RIAA are saying here is hey there are some illegal downloading going on but we do not know who it is so let's go fishing and see if we can catch some, lets have the ISP do it since they control the pipe. Who do they think they are ?,

I`m not sure if it is ok as per the US constitution
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Google's mobile hopes go beyond Nexus One

The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
• Photos: Unboxing Nexus One

Using your smartphone safely

faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.

About Coop's Corner

Charles Cooper has covered technology and business for more than 25 years. A graduate of Queens College and Columbia University, Cooper received the Excellence in Journalism award from the Northern California branch of the Society for Professional Journalists for column writing.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Coop's Corner topics

advertisement
advertisement