Comments on: Verizon plans more Fios for cities
Verizon COO Denny Strigl says the company will target more large cities as it deploys its Fios fiber-to-the-home broadband and video service.
Verizon COO Denny Strigl says the company will target more large cities as it deploys its Fios fiber-to-the-home broadband and video service.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
If you check your unfullfilled requests for service, I'm sure you will find many in Running Springs, CA. We're not a big city, but you'll do well competing with Charter Cable. That's why I have Verizon land line service, Verizon cell phone service, Verizon DSL. But Charter (ech) has the only TV service in town. Some folks use DirecTV, but it is difficult here to get a decent signal from their satelites and there are virtually no "over the air" channels available here.
Please come to Running Springs with FIOS!
I currently have DSL from a local ISP on a leased ATT line. 1.5Mbps up and 300 kbps down for $30/month.
ATT is now offering U-Verse in my neiborhood, so I checked the features and pricing thinking, heck, they installed all that bandwidth, surely I can get, say a symetrical 10 Mbs for a reasonable price. I don't watch TV, so I really could care less about that part of U-Verse.
Well, guess what? The best internet option is 10 Mbps down and 1.5 Mbps up for $55. Sounds pretty good, right? Wrong. You can't buy just internet service. I have to buy one of the TV packages. The cheapest package (no preminum channels) is $69. So, in order to bump up my internet connection, I have to pay $124/month.
That's right. These scumbags pulled fiber into my neighborhood, filled it up with a bunch commercial-laden drivel, bumped up their maximum internet access speeds less than 50% and are now requiring customers to purchase TV packages in order to get the incremental increase in internet access speed.
So, all I can say is "thank you to all you corporate ****** in congress and at the FCC for allowing the phone companies to re-monopolize, killing the CLECs, providing gigantic tax breaks and free easements to the re-formed telephone monopolies so that they could screw the consumer". Ain't deregulated monopolies great?
What about the bandwidth starved high tech workers in Campbell, San Jose, and other communities in the South SF Bay Area?
With all the high tech workers in the South Bay, why has not Verizon provided high performance broadband solutions to these residents? Competition for broadband provides solutions and I don't see competition with AT&T holding both telco DSL and cable modem services in all SF South Bay communities....
I have to endure painful, erratic DSL service from AT&T and they have not done squat to provide my area in Campbell with decent broadband.....
- by trancer944 October 18, 2008 10:25 PM PDT
- I live in Santa Clara, not far from Sun Microsystems, Cisco, Intel, etc... BUT there's no FTTH in our area. This is really strange. This is one of the most dense living areas in Santa Clara, and it should be easy to run fiber here, and lots of people willing to buy the service. It's a no-brainer to install this service here.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(8 Comments)