Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: 10 Most ANNOYING Characters On TV

Comments on: MySpace, Yahoo blame bad APIs for celebrity photos breach

Private photos of Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan found through bad APIs, rekindling debate on whether there is such a thing as privacy on social networks.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Dead Soulman June 4, 2008 5:56 PM PDT
If you're stupid enough to post stuff on the internet you don't want the world to see, then you deserve all the ridicule that may come your way. Just because a company says that the content will remain private, doesn't mean that it's guaranteed. But, considering that Lohan and Hilton are two exhibitionists and media-hungry clowns, well, they got they wanted. Attention. People forget to realize that when it comes to the internet, there's no such thing as privacy. Sooner or later that content will become public.
Reply to this comment
by Geeeeez June 5, 2008 3:27 AM PDT
You'd, "love" to talk to a guy who has never discovered anything except OLD information, OTHER PEOPLE have publicly posted... mindboggling.

"who found a hole in Facebook and got to photos on founder Mark Zuckerberg's private page in March."

I don't think so Eilnor.

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/how_you_used_to_view_private_photos_on_facebook
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis June 5, 2008 9:30 AM PDT
For goodness sakes..... frankly, why are these people upset that these pictures are getting on the internet? Frankly, my cousin was pleased as punch recently when a picture she uploaded onto her webpage was used by someone else in a photo collage of the 'most beautiful girls in America'.
It seems that there is a HUGE problem here with the stupidity of people who don't want other people to see them nude, yet upload these pictures WITHOUT PASSWORDS onto sites that sometimes, don't offer password protection of albums.
Reply to this comment
by Mergatroid Mania June 5, 2008 5:40 PM PDT
Considering the inaccurate information in the article, shouldn't it be completely pulled? At least edit the damn thing to reflect the truth of the origin of the exploit, and what a poor excuse for security they have at MySpace.

This is one reason why bloggers shouldn't be considered journalists.
Reply to this comment
by highlander2000 June 6, 2008 12:15 PM PDT
You don't mess with the Lohan
Reply to this comment
by thedudis June 6, 2008 3:47 PM PDT
Lindsay and Paris are two of the biggest wastes of space on planet Earth.
Reply to this comment
by treet007 June 6, 2008 5:51 PM PDT
Ng just needs to be placed in solitary confinement without any computers or Internet. That should drive him insane... He is no different than the stinkin paparazzi who exploits for profit and eventually kills someone in the process.
Reply to this comment
by MyopicVision June 7, 2008 6:57 AM PDT
You know I can understand wanting to be known through the online media and perhaps score a high paying job based on the infamy but to do it based on old information is pathetic.
I dont know who Brian Ng is but I agree ...he is a total tool. This code was out for MONTHS and no one was any wiser to it. Myspace have a problem on their hands especially as they changed the membership agreement AND have started using applications that handle real money.
These were all minor url exploits.
Not real hacks.
A hack is illegal.
URL exploits are just that. Exploits.
Hell Ive found URL exploits myself for social networking sites and when I emailed the site to tell them..they didn't really care...so as far as I'm concerned,...these sites get what they deserve with the embarrassment.
The fact is NOTHING is private on the internet.Once people realize that..they will be better off.
Reply to this comment
by mentalburner June 8, 2008 7:49 PM PDT
Celebrities and politicians don't realize that one of the reasons they have so much money and fame is because they don't have any privacy. It is one of the sacrifices of the occupation. Doctors work allot of hours and are exposed to diseases as an example. It's a part of the job. Tell them to lump it or leave it.
Reply to this comment
by private-internet July 18, 2008 10:21 AM PDT
There is a trade-off between convenience and security - a proper design system should let you keep your data to yourself and does not let your data be controlled by a third party. Current web services are geared towards public service not private service.
Reply to this comment
by benjaminstraight July 28, 2008 3:48 AM PDT
The blame game starts.
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Google's mobile hopes go beyond Nexus One

The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
• Photos: Unboxing Nexus One

Using your smartphone safely

faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here