Version: 2008

Comments on: CBS to buy CNET Networks

Media conglomerate plans to purchase CNET Networks, publisher of News.com, in a deal valued at $1.8 billion.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 2 of 4 pages (75 Comments)
by Sophistra May 15, 2008 9:35 AM PDT
There goes any negative reviews for apple, westinghouse, and anything else cbs corp owns or is in league with.
I'll quit my subscribing rss and podcast from here now..
Reply to this comment
by robert.allen May 15, 2008 9:35 AM PDT
This makes me really nervous. When CBS bought some local radio stations here in my city (which was still a large market) they wound up taking too much control...firing some of their best radio personalities, changing the name of the station...and losing much of their listener base to a competitor station. I'm not a fan of that particular station, but it's sad to see good people get fired even though their ratings were leading in their respective time slots. Obviously CBS radio and CBS Internet are probably two different monsters, but I just hope CBS just lets CNet do their thing like they have been doing.
Reply to this comment
by darkguardian May 15, 2008 9:43 AM PDT
I don't like this buyout either. I'm thinking what happened to MSNBC and "The Site". I've been with CNet since The Web and when Seacrest was on "The New Edge".
Reply to this comment
by Stating May 15, 2008 9:46 AM PDT
I'm waiting for Rupert Murdock to buy CBS. It's really inefficient to have 4 media conglomerates that run everything in the U.S. We should all work really hard to at least get the number down to 3.
Reply to this comment
by Ringthane May 15, 2008 9:46 AM PDT
Wow..... This is NOT good. Soon all media in the states will be controlled/manipulated by an oligopoly of broadcasters and it will ALL be garbage! If you do not believe me than take a look at the history of the Detroit automakers a.k.a. "The Big Three". I remember stories of "fresh off the factory floor" cars being delivered to dealers and doors falling off before they got to the showroom!!! Maximizing corporate profits will eventually dilute all content.
I think I need a drink...........
Reply to this comment
by Victorweb May 15, 2008 9:51 AM PDT
Well, something tells me that CNET will no longer be covering the **** that Viacom did to innocent people that posted on Youtube, now that Viacom owns CNET.

You guys are disgusting, and do very horrible reviews.
Reply to this comment
by heydanno May 15, 2008 10:59 AM PDT
CBS is not affiliated with Viacom and has not been since the beginning of 2006.
by designer_dave May 15, 2008 10:20 AM PDT
Letterman top 10 reasons you think your company is going to be bought out:

#10. they always wanted to be bought..
# 9. Madaline Albright shows up to negotiate
# 8 cnet never liked yahoo or microsoft anyway..
# 7. Curry in a Hurry rated a best buy on Chow
# 6. execs start coming to work in sandals and tshirts
# 5. Local homeless begin wearing CNET t-shirts
# 4. Original executives venture to start ups, only to collaborate together. CBS and Meebo for instance
# 3. Back Dating becomes the latest social networking site
# 2. murder she wrote becomes #1 viewed show on tv.com
# 1. Your office becomes the latest casulty in the newest episode of CSI
Reply to this comment
by MadLyb May 15, 2008 10:23 AM PDT
Yay!. Now that you've got some money, how about fixing this nasty comment system. Even the older version was better and it was terrible.
Reply to this comment
by JM_Brazil May 15, 2008 11:20 AM PDT
On the one hand, congratulations on the $1.8b! Better yet, in Cash. On the other, I will miss NEWS.com greatly. I cannot imagine CBS retaining the truly tech feel of news.com. *sigh* you'll be missed...
Reply to this comment
by austenw May 15, 2008 11:28 AM PDT
Unfortunately this is not good in my opinion. Selling out is great for the guys at the top but will ultimately be the end of a great thing. So long CNet, we hardly knew ye.
Reply to this comment
by solblack May 15, 2008 11:51 AM PDT
What a shame!
Reply to this comment
by make_or_break May 15, 2008 12:04 PM PDT
So...your staff can now play "Survivor...CNET"...should make for great mediocre TV. Whatta Reality.


Then again, they could always 'CSI' you as well.


Bada-bing, bada-boom...

Reply to this comment
by muzakaz May 15, 2008 12:10 PM PDT
Great... Next thing we know we are going to have a big ugly jpeg of Katie Couric on the main page - homogenizing every ounce news down to her politically correct, low brow thought process.

bye bye CNET.
Reply to this comment
by stevejbons May 15, 2008 12:16 PM PDT
There will be a geek revolt the likes of which we have not seen before. This is the equivalent of BYTE magazine being bought by Rupert Murdoch and turning it into Macworld.
Reply to this comment
by muzakaz May 15, 2008 1:19 PM PDT
LOL -> all nerds band together and pull their shorts up higher!
by jemiller0 May 15, 2008 12:27 PM PDT
I think it's a horrible idea. The media is controlled by too few companies as it is.
Reply to this comment
by Rightwingerssuck May 15, 2008 1:15 PM PDT
fafafooey:

"Expect even more left wing biased pro-Democrat news on here..."

So you're just another stupid ignorant right winger trying to make a case for nothing... Go back to you mud hole.
Reply to this comment
by just the facts May 16, 2008 7:15 AM PDT
AMEN!
by majid_download May 15, 2008 1:36 PM PDT
I don't think I like this . As a user of many Cnet sites such as GameSpot,GameFAQs,GameRankings,MetaCritic,and to a lesser degree TV.com and MP3.com , the uncertainty of the future of things on these sites b othered me the second I read the news .
Reply to this comment
by bobabowie May 15, 2008 2:02 PM PDT
This is a perfect example of why CNET has lagged behind the competition in recent years. Is this a news story or a blog entry? It's filed under News Blog, yet all it really states is a regurgitation of the AP report. There's no commentary or any other sign of a personal opinion in this "blog." If this were someone's blog, they would say what they think of the deal, if it makes sense, etc. This is a wire report, and should be filed as such. As has been the case for years now, if you want to read a true opinion of the deal, you'll have to leave CNET's pages to read a competitor's blog (out of respect, I won't mention where, but they're out there). CNET likes to say it has blogs, but their writers don't have the freedom to write whatever they want. I doubt that will change now that they're owned by the same man that got the shakes whenever Howard Stern opened his mouth. He'll tolerate it while the money rolls in, but if the dollars ain't there, look out.
Reply to this comment
by supermorty May 15, 2008 2:09 PM PDT
If CNET Networks merges with CBS, what will happen to MovieTome.com and TV.com?
Reply to this comment
by supermorty May 15, 2008 2:24 PM PDT
If CNET Networks merges with CBS, what will happen to MovieTome.com and TV.com?
Reply to this comment
Showing 2 of 4 pages (75 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here